Relationship between sarcopenia and pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2019.12.001
Takashi Wada , Shinji Tanishima , Mari Osaki , Hideki Nagashima , Hiroshi Hagino
{"title":"Relationship between sarcopenia and pain catastrophizing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Takashi Wada ,&nbsp;Shinji Tanishima ,&nbsp;Mari Osaki ,&nbsp;Hideki Nagashima ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Hagino","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2019.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to clarify the psychological factors related to sarcopenia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study included 72 patients with LSS (38 males and 34 females; mean age, 70.4 ± 6.9 years). Demographic data, lower extremity pain, back pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire score, walking velocity, grip strength, walking distance, and appendicular muscle mass were assessed. Muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Patients were grouped based on sarcopenia status according to skeletal muscle mass index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of sarcopenia was 13.9% (10 of 72 patients). Sarcopenia was significantly more common in females. The incidence of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group. The sarcopenia group had lower body weight, body mass index, grip strength, and walking distance than the control group. The sarcopenia group had higher PCS scores and HADS-anxiety scores. Multivariate analysis identified body weight, dyslipidemia, walking distance, and PCS score as significantly related to sarcopenia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Pain catastrophizing might be the most relevant psychological factor in sarcopenia. Evaluation of both physical function and pain catastrophizing is needed when investigating sarcopenia in LSS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 132-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.afos.2019.12.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525519300822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to clarify the psychological factors related to sarcopenia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 72 patients with LSS (38 males and 34 females; mean age, 70.4 ± 6.9 years). Demographic data, lower extremity pain, back pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire score, walking velocity, grip strength, walking distance, and appendicular muscle mass were assessed. Muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Patients were grouped based on sarcopenia status according to skeletal muscle mass index.

Results

The prevalence of sarcopenia was 13.9% (10 of 72 patients). Sarcopenia was significantly more common in females. The incidence of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group. The sarcopenia group had lower body weight, body mass index, grip strength, and walking distance than the control group. The sarcopenia group had higher PCS scores and HADS-anxiety scores. Multivariate analysis identified body weight, dyslipidemia, walking distance, and PCS score as significantly related to sarcopenia.

Conclusions

Pain catastrophizing might be the most relevant psychological factor in sarcopenia. Evaluation of both physical function and pain catastrophizing is needed when investigating sarcopenia in LSS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎管狭窄症患者肌肉减少症与疼痛突变的关系:一项横断面研究
目的探讨腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者肌肉减少症的相关心理因素。方法本研究纳入72例LSS患者(男38例,女34例;平均年龄70.4±6.9岁)。评估人口统计学数据、下肢疼痛、背部疼痛、日本骨科协会评分、疼痛大化量表(PCS)评分、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评分、恐惧回避信念问卷评分、步行速度、握力、步行距离和阑尾肌质量。采用生物电阻抗分析法测量肌肉质量。根据骨骼肌质量指数对骨骼肌减少症患者进行分组。结果72例患者中肌肉减少症发生率为13.9%(10例)。肌肉减少症在女性中更为常见。肌少症组血脂异常和心血管疾病的发生率明显增高。肌肉减少症组的体重、体重指数、握力和步行距离均低于对照组。肌少症组PCS评分和hads焦虑评分较高。多变量分析发现体重、血脂异常、步行距离和PCS评分与肌肉减少症显著相关。结论西班牙灾难化可能是骨骼肌减少症最相关的心理因素。在研究下肢肌少症时,需要评估身体功能和疼痛灾变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of bone metabolism on hematopoiesis: A Mendelian randomization study Erythropoietin treatment and osteoporotic fracture risk in hemodialysis patients: A nationwide population-based study Hip fracture and type 2 diabetes mellitus Osteoporosis in men—East and West: Can the twain meet? A perspective from Asia Reply on “Hip fracture and type 2 diabetes mellitus”: Bi-directional relationship between osteoporosis and diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1