Knowledge and attitudes of subfertile couples towards disposition of supernumerary cryopreserved embryos: an Indian perspective

Achamma Chandy , Batiston Waanbah , Bijesh Yadav , Aleyamma T. Kunjummen , D.J.S. Riley , Mohan S. Kamath
{"title":"Knowledge and attitudes of subfertile couples towards disposition of supernumerary cryopreserved embryos: an Indian perspective","authors":"Achamma Chandy ,&nbsp;Batiston Waanbah ,&nbsp;Bijesh Yadav ,&nbsp;Aleyamma T. Kunjummen ,&nbsp;D.J.S. Riley ,&nbsp;Mohan S. Kamath","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In many cases, supernumerary embryos are cryopreserved for future use following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Once a couple has completed their family following treatment, the fate of these excess cryopreserved embryos becomes uncertain. The options available for the disposition of cryopreserved embryos are donation to other infertile couples, donation to research and discontinuation of cryostorage. In order to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of subfertile couples from the Indian subcontinent regarding the fate of their excess cryopreserved embryos, a cross-sectional study was planned at a university-level infertility unit. A two-stage structured interview was conducted with the couples. Some questions in the interview were hypothetical in nature. In total, 87 couples were interviewed, of which 33 (37.9%) were unaware of the options for disposition of supernumerary embryos. Forty (46%) couples indicated a preference to donate their embryos to other subfertile couples, while 10 (11.5%) couples preferred donation to research. Twenty-four (27.6%) couples opted for donation to both other couples and research, while three (3.4%) couples indicated a preference to discontinue storage. Penalized bivariable logistic regression showed that none of the factors examined (i.e. age, education, income or presence of a living child) influenced the couple’s decision regarding embryo donation. The majority of subfertile couples preferred to donate the embryos rather than discontinue storage. The donation of embryos to other subfertile couples was the most preferred option for disposition of embryos.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661819300152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In many cases, supernumerary embryos are cryopreserved for future use following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Once a couple has completed their family following treatment, the fate of these excess cryopreserved embryos becomes uncertain. The options available for the disposition of cryopreserved embryos are donation to other infertile couples, donation to research and discontinuation of cryostorage. In order to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of subfertile couples from the Indian subcontinent regarding the fate of their excess cryopreserved embryos, a cross-sectional study was planned at a university-level infertility unit. A two-stage structured interview was conducted with the couples. Some questions in the interview were hypothetical in nature. In total, 87 couples were interviewed, of which 33 (37.9%) were unaware of the options for disposition of supernumerary embryos. Forty (46%) couples indicated a preference to donate their embryos to other subfertile couples, while 10 (11.5%) couples preferred donation to research. Twenty-four (27.6%) couples opted for donation to both other couples and research, while three (3.4%) couples indicated a preference to discontinue storage. Penalized bivariable logistic regression showed that none of the factors examined (i.e. age, education, income or presence of a living child) influenced the couple’s decision regarding embryo donation. The majority of subfertile couples preferred to donate the embryos rather than discontinue storage. The donation of embryos to other subfertile couples was the most preferred option for disposition of embryos.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识和态度的不育夫妇对处置多余的冷冻胚胎:一个印度的观点
在许多情况下,辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗后,多余的胚胎被冷冻保存以备将来使用。一旦一对夫妇在治疗后完成了他们的家庭,这些多余的冷冻胚胎的命运就变得不确定了。处理冷冻胚胎的选择有:捐赠给其他不孕夫妇、捐赠给研究和停止冷冻。为了评估来自印度次大陆的不育夫妇对其多余冷冻胚胎命运的认识和态度,计划在大学一级的不孕症单位进行横断面研究。对这些夫妇进行了两阶段的结构化访谈。面试中的一些问题本质上是假设性的。共采访了87对夫妇,其中33对(37.9%)不知道处理多余胚胎的选择。40对夫妇(46%)表示更愿意将胚胎捐赠给其他不孕夫妇,而10对夫妇(11.5%)更愿意将胚胎捐赠给研究。24对夫妇(27.6%)选择捐赠给其他夫妇和研究,而3对夫妇(3.4%)表示倾向于停止储存。受惩罚的双变量逻辑回归显示,所检查的因素(即年龄、教育程度、收入或是否有活着的孩子)都没有影响夫妇对胚胎捐赠的决定。大多数不孕夫妇宁愿捐献胚胎,也不愿停止储存。将胚胎捐赠给其他不孕夫妇是处理胚胎的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Telling donor-conceived children about their conception: Evaluation of the use of the Donor Conception Network children’s books The missed disease? Endometriosis as an example of ‘undone science’ Financing future fertility: Women’s views on funding egg freezing Ignoring international alerts? The routinization of episiotomy in France in the 1980s and 1990s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1