首页 > 最新文献

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online最新文献

英文 中文
Conceptualizing aged reproduction: genetic connectedness, son preference and assisted reproduction in North India 概念化老年生殖:遗传联系,儿子偏好和辅助生殖在北印度
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.005
Anindita Majumdar

In this paper, I explore the narratives on the administration of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments amongst ageing men and women who are past their ‘reproductive prime’. I use the phrase ‘past their reproductive prime’ with caution as ART has the capability to resurrect the desire, quest and conception of children amongst these ageing women and men. In rural agrarian Haryana in North India, ART panders to, and provides, potent narratives for perpetuation of the patrilineage for genetic continuity through the male line. The administration of ART treatments to this particular demographic is undertaken through the ‘operation’ of two particular forms of discourse: the desire for genetic perpetuity, and the pursuit of sons. In this enterprise, the aged pregnant body becomes an important trope of resurrecting childless marriages, evidenced by the secrecy surrounding the use of donated sperm, and the open rejection of adoption. Through an exploration of conceptualizations of pregnancy, age and legislation in India, I present the argument that ART supports the pursuit of genetic connectedness by resurrecting the social importance of genetic connectedness through sons and the pregnant wife. In this paper, I purposely engage with elements of the study of kinship and family in South Asia to undertake an analysis of how ART is used as part of a larger social narrative around conception and pregnancy amongst older married couples.

在这篇论文中,我探讨了关于辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗在老年男性和女性谁是过去的“生育高峰期”管理的叙述。我谨慎地使用“过了生育高峰期”这个词,因为抗逆转录病毒疗法有能力在这些老年男女中复活对孩子的渴望、追求和概念。在印度北部哈里亚纳邦的农村地区,ART迎合并提供了强有力的叙事,以使父系得以延续,从而实现男性遗传的连续性。ART治疗对这一特定人群的管理是通过两种特定话语形式的“操作”来进行的:对遗传永续的渴望和对儿子的追求。在这项事业中,年老怀孕的身体成为复活无子女婚姻的一个重要比喻,这可以通过秘密使用捐赠精子和公开拒绝收养来证明。通过对印度怀孕、年龄和立法概念化的探索,我提出了ART通过复活儿子和怀孕妻子的遗传联系的社会重要性来支持对遗传联系的追求的论点。在本文中,我有意参与南亚亲属关系和家庭研究的要素,以分析如何将ART用作大龄已婚夫妇怀孕和怀孕的更大社会叙事的一部分。
{"title":"Conceptualizing aged reproduction: genetic connectedness, son preference and assisted reproduction in North India","authors":"Anindita Majumdar","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, I explore the narratives on the administration of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments amongst ageing men and women who are past their ‘reproductive prime’. I use the phrase ‘past their reproductive prime’ with caution as ART has the capability to resurrect the desire, quest and conception of children amongst these ageing women and men. In rural agrarian Haryana in North India, ART panders to, and provides, potent narratives for perpetuation of the patrilineage for genetic continuity through the male line. The administration of ART treatments to this particular demographic is undertaken through the ‘operation’ of two particular forms of discourse: the desire for genetic perpetuity, and the pursuit of sons. In this enterprise, the aged pregnant body becomes an important trope of resurrecting childless marriages, evidenced by the secrecy surrounding the use of donated sperm, and the open rejection of adoption. Through an exploration of conceptualizations of pregnancy, age and legislation in India, I present the argument that ART supports the pursuit of genetic connectedness by resurrecting the social importance of genetic connectedness through sons and the pregnant wife. In this paper, I purposely engage with elements of the study of kinship and family in South Asia to undertake an analysis of how ART is used as part of a larger social narrative around conception and pregnancy amongst older married couples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 182-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/24/main.PMC8732776.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39816974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is perceived inability to procreate associated with life satisfaction? Evidence from a German panel study 感知到的生育能力与生活满意度有关吗?来自德国小组研究的证据
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.004
Julia McQuillan , Jasmin Passet-Wittig , Arthur L. Greil , Martin Bujard

Most studies of the psychosocial consequences of infertility have focused on those who seek medical treatment, leaving a research gap regarding the psychosocial consequences of perceived inability to procreate in the general population. Moreover, most studies are cross-sectional and the results are thus likely affected by omitted variable bias. Inspired by aspects of the Theory of Conjunctural Action, this study analysed 10 waves of data from the German Family Panel (pairfam) for women and men using fixed effects panel regression and including time-varying control variables suggested by theory and research. This study found that both women and men experienced lower life satisfaction in years when they perceived an inability to procreate. This association was not affected by the inclusion of relevant time-varying control variables. Furthermore, the association between perceived barriers to procreation and life satisfaction was found to differ depending on life circumstances and gender. Women with partners and men without partners had lower life satisfaction when they perceived an inability to procreate compared with when they did not. Women and men who intended to have a(nother) child had lower life satisfaction when they perceived an inability to procreate compared with when they did not. The association, however, was only significant for men. Somewhat surprisingly, women who perceived an inability to procreate also had lower life satisfaction when they were not intending to have a(nother) child. This study makes an important contribution to research on the psychosocial consequences of perceived infertility, and provides insights into why some people may pursue assisted reproductive technology for family creation.

关于不孕症的社会心理后果的大多数研究都集中在那些寻求医疗的人身上,在一般人群中被认为无法生育的社会心理后果方面留下了研究空白。此外,大多数研究是横断面的,因此结果可能受到遗漏变量偏差的影响。受联合行动理论(Theory of conjuncial Action)的启发,本研究使用固定效应面板回归,包括理论和研究建议的时变控制变量,分析了德国家庭面板(pairfam)中女性和男性的10波数据。这项研究发现,无论男性还是女性,当他们感到无法生育时,他们的生活满意度都会降低。这种关联不受纳入相关时变控制变量的影响。此外,生殖障碍与生活满意度之间的关系因生活环境和性别而异。与没有伴侣的男性相比,有伴侣的女性和没有伴侣的男性在感觉自己无法生育时的生活满意度较低。想要再要一个孩子的男女,当他们觉得自己没有生育能力时,对生活的满意度比没有生育能力时要低。然而,这种关联只对男性有意义。有些令人惊讶的是,那些认为自己没有生育能力的女性在不打算生育(另一个)孩子时,对生活的满意度也较低。这项研究对不孕症的社会心理后果的研究做出了重要贡献,并提供了为什么有些人可能会寻求辅助生殖技术来建立家庭的见解。
{"title":"Is perceived inability to procreate associated with life satisfaction? Evidence from a German panel study","authors":"Julia McQuillan ,&nbsp;Jasmin Passet-Wittig ,&nbsp;Arthur L. Greil ,&nbsp;Martin Bujard","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most studies of the psychosocial consequences of infertility have focused on those who seek medical treatment, leaving a research gap regarding the psychosocial consequences of perceived inability to procreate in the general population. Moreover, most studies are cross-sectional and the results are thus likely affected by omitted variable bias. Inspired by aspects of the Theory of Conjunctural Action<em>,</em> this study analysed 10 waves of data from the German Family Panel (pairfam) for women and men using fixed effects panel regression and including time-varying control variables suggested by theory and research. This study found that both women and men experienced lower life satisfaction in years when they perceived an inability to procreate. This association was not affected by the inclusion of relevant time-varying control variables. Furthermore, the association between perceived barriers to procreation and life satisfaction was found to differ depending on life circumstances and gender. Women with partners and men without partners had lower life satisfaction when they perceived an inability to procreate compared with when they did not. Women and men who intended to have a(nother) child had lower life satisfaction when they perceived an inability to procreate compared with when they did not. The association, however, was only significant for men. Somewhat surprisingly, women who perceived an inability to procreate also had lower life satisfaction when they were not intending to have a(nother) child. This study makes an important contribution to research on the psychosocial consequences of perceived infertility, and provides insights into why some people may pursue assisted reproductive technology for family creation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 87-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/9b/main.PMC8627902.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39955557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey 为人父母的愿望和对影响实现愿望的因素的了解:一项人口调查
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.006
Karin Hammarberg , Renee de Silva

Most women and men want and expect to have children. Parental age and some health behaviours affect fertility and the chance of conception. The aim of this study was to gauge people’s parenthood aspirations and knowledge about the factors that affect their chance of achieving them. Members of an Australian probability-based online panel aged 18–45 years were invited to complete a survey with questions about parenthood goals and knowledge about factors known to affect fertility. Of the 965 eligible people, 716 (74.2%) completed the survey. Only 6% stated that they did not want biological children. Around one in 10 respondents had experienced infertility. Amongst respondents aged 35–45 years, almost one in five (18%) had experienced infertility. Overall, respondents reported high levels of confidence about their understanding of preventative measures associated with safe sex and avoiding unwanted pregnancies. However, confidence in understanding of factors affecting ability to conceive was lower. Almost one-third of respondents believed that female fertility starts to decline between the ages of 35 and 39 years, and another one-third of respondents believed that the decline starts at 40 years of age or later. One in four respondents believed that male fertility starts to decline at 50 years of age or later. Findings suggest that people of reproductive age in Australia have inadequate knowledge about the factors that affect the chance of achieving their parenthood goals. Fertility health education initiatives are needed to allow people to make informed decisions about childbearing, and reduce the risk of unfulfilled parenthood aspirations.

大多数男人和女人都想要孩子。父母年龄和某些健康行为影响生育能力和受孕机会。这项研究的目的是衡量人们为人父母的愿望,以及对影响他们实现愿望的因素的了解。澳大利亚一个基于概率的在线小组邀请年龄在18-45岁 之间的成员完成一项调查,问题包括为人父母的目标和对已知影响生育因素的了解。在965名符合条件的人中,有716人(74.2%)完成了调查。只有6%的人表示他们不想要亲生孩子。大约十分之一的受访者经历过不孕。在35-45岁 年龄段的答复者中,几乎五分之一(18%)经历过不孕症。总体而言,答复者报告说,他们对与安全性行为和避免意外怀孕有关的预防措施的理解有很高的信心。然而,对影响怀孕能力的因素的理解信心较低。几乎三分之一的受访者认为,女性生育能力在35岁至39岁 之间开始下降,另有三分之一的受访者认为,这种下降始于40 岁或更晚。四分之一的受访者认为男性生育能力在50岁或更晚的时候开始下降 。研究结果表明,澳大利亚育龄人口对影响实现生育目标机会的因素了解不足。需要采取生育健康教育举措,使人们能够对生育作出知情决定,并减少未能实现生育愿望的风险。
{"title":"Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey","authors":"Karin Hammarberg ,&nbsp;Renee de Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most women and men want and expect to have children. Parental age and some health behaviours affect fertility and the chance of conception. The aim of this study was to gauge people’s parenthood aspirations and knowledge about the factors that affect their chance of achieving them. Members of an Australian probability-based online panel aged 18–45 years were invited to complete a survey with questions about parenthood goals and knowledge about factors known to affect fertility. Of the 965 eligible people, 716 (74.2%) completed the survey. Only 6% stated that they did not want biological children. Around one in 10 respondents had experienced infertility. Amongst respondents aged 35–45 years, almost one in five (18%) had experienced infertility. Overall, respondents reported high levels of confidence about their understanding of preventative measures associated with safe sex and avoiding unwanted pregnancies. However, confidence in understanding of factors affecting ability to conceive was lower. Almost one-third of respondents believed that female fertility starts to decline between the ages of 35 and 39 years, and another one-third of respondents believed that the decline starts at 40 years of age or later. One in four respondents believed that male fertility starts to decline at 50 years of age or later. Findings suggest that people of reproductive age in Australia have inadequate knowledge about the factors that affect the chance of achieving their parenthood goals. Fertility health education initiatives are needed to allow people to make informed decisions about childbearing, and reduce the risk of unfulfilled parenthood aspirations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 265-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000423/pdfft?md5=7342e9f750f912a67eefe8281242b78d&pid=1-s2.0-S2405661821000423-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49083131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Financing future fertility: Women’s views on funding egg freezing 资助未来生育:女性对资助冷冻卵子的看法
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.001
Molly Johnston , Giuliana Fuscaldo , Stella May Gwini , Sally Catt , Nadine Maree Richings

Like other assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures, the cost of egg freezing (EF) is significant, presenting a potential barrier to access. Given recent technological advancements and rising demand for EF, it is timely to reassess how EF is funded. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in Victoria, Australia and was completed by 656 female individuals. Participants were asked their views on funding for both medical and non-medical EF. The median age of participants was 28 years (interquartile range 23–37 years) and most participants were employed (44% full-time, 28% part-time, 33% students). There was very high support for public funding for medical EF (n = 574, 87%), with 302 (46%) participants indicating support for the complete funding of medical EF through the public system. Views about funding for non-medical EF were more divided; 43 (6%) participants supported full public funding, 235 (36%) supported partial public funding, 150 (23%) supported coverage through private health insurance, and 204 (31%) indicated that non-medical EF should be self-funded. If faced with the decision of what to do with surplus eggs, a high proportion of participants indicated that they would consider donation (71% to research, 59% to a known recipient, 52% to a donor programme), indicating that eggs surplus to requirements could be a potential source of donor eggs. This study provides insights that could inform policy review, and suggests revisiting whether the medical/non-medical distinction is a fair criterion to allocate funding to ART.

与其他辅助生殖技术(ART)程序一样,卵子冷冻(EF)的成本很高,可能成为获得卵子的障碍。鉴于最近的技术进步和对环境教育不断增长的需求,重新评估环境教育的资金来源是及时的。一项在线横断面调查在澳大利亚维多利亚州进行,共有656名女性完成。与会者被问及他们对医疗和非医疗教育经费筹措的看法。参与者的年龄中位数为28 岁(四分位数范围23-37 岁),大多数参与者有工作(44%全职,28%兼职,33%学生)。公共资助医疗EF的支持度非常高(n = 574,87%),302名(46%)参与者表示支持通过公共系统完全资助医疗EF。对于非医疗EF的资助,意见分歧更大;43个(6%)参与者支持全额公共资金,235个(36%)参与者支持部分公共资金,150个(23%)参与者支持通过私人健康保险进行覆盖,204个(31%)参与者表示非医疗环境教育应自筹资金。如果要决定如何处理多余的卵子,很大比例的参与者表示他们会考虑捐赠(71%用于研究,59%用于已知的接受者,52%用于捐赠计划),这表明多余的卵子可能是捐赠卵子的潜在来源。这项研究提供了可以为政策审查提供信息的见解,并建议重新审视医疗/非医疗区分是否是分配抗逆转录病毒治疗资金的公平标准。
{"title":"Financing future fertility: Women’s views on funding egg freezing","authors":"Molly Johnston ,&nbsp;Giuliana Fuscaldo ,&nbsp;Stella May Gwini ,&nbsp;Sally Catt ,&nbsp;Nadine Maree Richings","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Like other assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures, the cost of egg freezing (EF) is significant, presenting a potential barrier to access. Given recent technological advancements and rising demand for EF, it is timely to reassess how EF is funded. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in Victoria, Australia and was completed by 656 female individuals. Participants were asked their views on funding for both medical and non-medical EF. The median age of participants was 28 years (interquartile range 23–37 years) and most participants were employed (44% full-time, 28% part-time, 33% students). There was very high support for public funding for medical EF (<em>n =</em> 574, 87%), with 302 (46%) participants indicating support for the complete funding of medical EF through the public system. Views about funding for non-medical EF were more divided; 43 (6%) participants supported full public funding, 235 (36%) supported partial public funding, 150 (23%) supported coverage through private health insurance, and 204 (31%) indicated that non-medical EF should be self-funded. If faced with the decision of what to do with surplus eggs, a high proportion of participants indicated that they would consider donation (71% to research, 59% to a known recipient, 52% to a donor programme), indicating that eggs surplus to requirements could be a potential source of donor eggs. This study provides insights that could inform policy review, and suggests revisiting whether the medical/non-medical distinction is a fair criterion to allocate funding to ART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39555565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Metabolic risk factors and fertility disorders: A narrative review of the female perspective 代谢危险因素和生育障碍:女性视角的叙事回顾
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.002
Ronny Westerman , Anne-Kristin Kuhnt

Metabolic risk factors such as obesity are considered major obstacles to female fertility. Chronic infertility imposes psychological and social burdens on women because infertility violates societal gender roles. Although the prevalence of obesity among women is expected to increase in the future, the relevance of metabolic status for fertility is still underestimated. However, the assessment of metabolic risk factors is highly relevant for understanding fertility disorders and improving infertility treatment. This narrative review discusses the associations of metabolic risk factors (e.g. obesity, female athlete triad, oxidative stress) with significant infertility. An electronic search was conducted for studies published between 2006 and 2020 in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and related databases. In total, this search identified 19,309 results for polycystic ovary syndrome, 28,969 results for endometriosis, and only 1611 results for idiopathic and/or unknown infertility. For the present narrative review, 50 relevant studies were included: 19 studies were on obesity, 24 studies investigated the female athlete triad, and seven studies addressed other risk factors, including reactive oxygen species. This narrative review confirms the direct impact of obesity on female infertility, while the effect of other risk factors needs to be confirmed by large-scale population studies.

肥胖等代谢风险因素被认为是女性生育能力的主要障碍。慢性不孕症给妇女带来心理和社会负担,因为不孕症违反了社会性别角色。尽管未来女性肥胖的患病率预计会增加,但代谢状况与生育能力的相关性仍被低估。然而,代谢危险因素的评估与理解生育障碍和改善不孕症治疗高度相关。这篇综述讨论了代谢危险因素(如肥胖、女运动员三联症、氧化应激)与显著不育的关系。对2006年至2020年间发表在护理和相关健康文献累积索引、ScienceDirect、PubMed、Scopus、Google Scholar和相关数据库中的研究进行了电子检索。总的来说,这项研究发现了19309例多囊卵巢综合征,28969例子宫内膜异位症,只有1611例特发性和/或未知的不孕症。在目前的叙述性综述中,纳入了50项相关研究:19项研究是关于肥胖的,24项研究是关于女性运动员三合会的,7项研究是关于其他危险因素的,包括活性氧。这篇叙述性综述证实了肥胖对女性不孕症的直接影响,而其他危险因素的影响需要通过大规模的人群研究来证实。
{"title":"Metabolic risk factors and fertility disorders: A narrative review of the female perspective","authors":"Ronny Westerman ,&nbsp;Anne-Kristin Kuhnt","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metabolic risk factors such as obesity are considered major obstacles to female fertility. Chronic infertility imposes psychological and social burdens on women because infertility violates societal gender roles. Although the prevalence of obesity among women is expected to increase in the future, the relevance of metabolic status for fertility is still underestimated. However, the assessment of metabolic risk factors is highly relevant for understanding fertility disorders and improving infertility treatment. This narrative review discusses the associations of metabolic risk factors (e.g. obesity, female athlete triad, oxidative stress) with significant infertility. An electronic search was conducted for studies published between 2006 and 2020 in Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and related databases. In total, this search identified 19,309 results for polycystic ovary syndrome, 28,969 results for endometriosis, and only 1611 results for idiopathic and/or unknown infertility. For the present narrative review, 50 relevant studies were included: 19 studies were on obesity, 24 studies investigated the female athlete triad, and seven studies addressed other risk factors, including reactive oxygen species. This narrative review confirms the direct impact of obesity on female infertility, while the effect of other risk factors needs to be confirmed by large-scale population studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/df/main.PMC8569630.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39614080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
The Duogynon controversy and ignorance production in post-thalidomide West Germany 后沙利度胺时代西德的“双雄”争议与无知生产
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.003
Birgit Nemec , Jesse Olszynko-Gryn

This article examines the West German controversy over Duogynon, a ‘hormone pregnancy test’ and the drug at the centre of the first major, international debate over iatrogenic birth defects in the post-thalidomide era. It recovers an asymmetrical power struggle over the uneven distribution of biomedical knowledge and ignorance (about teratogenic risk) that pitted parent-activists, whistleblowers and investigative journalists against industrialists, scientific experts and government officials. It sheds new light on the nexus of reproduction, disability, epidemiology and health activism in West Germany. In addition, it begins to recover an internationally influential discourse that, in the post-thalidomide world, seems to have resuscitated antenatal drug use as safe until proven harmful.

本文考察了西德关于Duogynon的争论,Duogynon是一种“激素妊娠试验”,也是后沙利度胺时代第一次主要的国际医源性出生缺陷辩论的中心药物。它再现了一场不对称的权力斗争,围绕着生物医学知识和无知(关于致畸风险)的不平等分布,这场斗争使家长活动家、举报人和调查记者与实业家、科学专家和政府官员之间产生了对立。它揭示了西德生殖、残疾、流行病学和健康行动主义之间的关系。此外,它开始恢复一种具有国际影响力的话语,在沙利度胺后的世界中,这种话语似乎已经复苏,产前用药是安全的,直到被证明有害。
{"title":"The Duogynon controversy and ignorance production in post-thalidomide West Germany","authors":"Birgit Nemec ,&nbsp;Jesse Olszynko-Gryn","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the West German controversy over Duogynon, a ‘hormone pregnancy test’ and the drug at the centre of the first major, international debate over iatrogenic birth defects in the post-thalidomide era. It recovers an asymmetrical power struggle over the uneven distribution of biomedical knowledge and ignorance (about teratogenic risk) that pitted parent-activists, whistleblowers and investigative journalists against industrialists, scientific experts and government officials. It sheds new light on the nexus of reproduction, disability, epidemiology and health activism in West Germany. In addition, it begins to recover an internationally influential discourse that, in the post-thalidomide world, seems to have resuscitated antenatal drug use as safe until proven harmful.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 75-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648809/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39616940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Symposium: Risk, innovation and ignorance production in the field of reproductive biomedicine 专题讨论会:生殖生物医学领域的风险、创新和无知生产
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.003
Susan E. Bell

This commentary evaluates the contributions to this special issue through a feminist lens. It reviews the field of ignorance studies and two distinguishable areas in the field: undone science and ignorance/non-knowledge. It points to ways in which the articles in this special issue engage with the social production of ignorance. It explores feminist roots of ignorance studies, including feminist ignorance epistemologies, identifies strengths and gaps in ignorance studies, and suggests possible lines of future work.

这篇评论通过女权主义的视角来评价对本期特刊的贡献。它回顾了无知研究领域和该领域的两个可区分的领域:未完成的科学和无知/无知识。它指出了本期特刊文章探讨无知的社会生产的方式。它探讨了无知研究的女性主义根源,包括女性主义无知认识论,确定了无知研究的优势和差距,并提出了未来工作的可能方向。
{"title":"Symposium: Risk, innovation and ignorance production in the field of reproductive biomedicine","authors":"Susan E. Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This commentary evaluates the contributions to this special issue through a feminist lens. It reviews the field of ignorance studies and two distinguishable areas in the field: undone science and ignorance/non-knowledge. It points to ways in which the articles in this special issue engage with the social production of ignorance. It explores feminist roots of ignorance studies, including feminist ignorance epistemologies, identifies strengths and gaps in ignorance studies, and suggests possible lines of future work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 121-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717416/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39915692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
At risk of reproductive disadvantage? Exploring fertility awareness among migrant women in Germany 有生殖劣势的风险?探讨德国移民妇女的生育意识
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.007
Nadja Milewski , Sonja Haug

This study examined awareness about fertility among immigrant women and non-migrants in Germany. The social relevance of infertility and fertility treatment is increasing in Western countries due to continually low overall birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and actual numbers of children. While there is growing interest in infertility and reproductive medicine in general, previous studies have rarely included immigrant or ethnic minorities in Europe. This study investigated whether knowledge on the age-related fertility decline (ARFD) varies between migrant groups and the majority group, and the role of education. Working hypotheses were drawn from theoretical considerations on frameworks of migrant assimilation. The analysis was based on data collected in a social science pilot study on reproductive medicine, representative of the general population (‘NeWiRe’ 2014–2015). The sample included 962 women aged 18–50 years living in Germany. Approximately 81% of the sample were immigrants who originated from Turkey, Poland, the Balkan countries or countries of the (post-Soviet) Commonwealth of Independent States. While rather poor overall, knowledge on ARFD was found to be significantly lower in the migrant groups compared with the majority group. This minority-group disadvantage cannot be explained by sociodemographic or cultural variables. Future research should include minority groups in empirical studies on awareness about fertility in order to better understand the causes of this disadvantage, and the potential reproductive needs of migrants.

这项研究调查了德国移民妇女和非移民妇女对生育的认识。在西方国家,不孕不育和生育治疗的社会意义正在增加,原因是总体出生率持续较低,无子女率高,期望和实际子女数量之间存在差距。虽然人们对不孕症和生殖医学的兴趣越来越大,但以前的研究很少包括欧洲的移民或少数民族。本研究调查了移民群体与多数群体对年龄相关生育率下降(ARFD)的认知是否存在差异,以及教育在其中的作用。工作假设是从对移民同化框架的理论考虑中得出的。该分析基于一项生殖医学社会科学试点研究收集的数据,该研究代表了一般人群(“NeWiRe”2014-2015)。样本包括962名年龄在18-50岁 之间的德国女性。大约81%的样本是来自土耳其、波兰、巴尔干国家或(前苏联)独立国家联合体国家的移民。虽然总体上很差,但与大多数群体相比,移民群体对ARFD的了解明显较低。这种少数群体的劣势不能用社会人口统计学或文化变量来解释。今后的研究应将少数群体纳入对生育认识的实证研究,以便更好地了解这种不利因素的原因和移徙者潜在的生殖需要。
{"title":"At risk of reproductive disadvantage? Exploring fertility awareness among migrant women in Germany","authors":"Nadja Milewski ,&nbsp;Sonja Haug","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined awareness about fertility among immigrant women and non-migrants in Germany. The social relevance of infertility and fertility treatment is increasing in Western countries due to continually low overall birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and actual numbers of children. While there is growing interest in infertility and reproductive medicine in general, previous studies have rarely included immigrant or ethnic minorities in Europe. This study investigated whether knowledge on the age-related fertility decline (ARFD) varies between migrant groups and the majority group, and the role of education. Working hypotheses were drawn from theoretical considerations on frameworks of migrant assimilation. The analysis was based on data collected in a social science pilot study on reproductive medicine, representative of the general population (‘NeWiRe’ 2014–2015). The sample included 962 women aged 18–50 years living in Germany. Approximately 81% of the sample were immigrants who originated from Turkey, Poland, the Balkan countries or countries of the (post-Soviet) Commonwealth of Independent States. While rather poor overall, knowledge on ARFD was found to be significantly lower in the migrant groups compared with the majority group. This minority-group disadvantage cannot be explained by sociodemographic or cultural variables. Future research should include minority groups in empirical studies on awareness about fertility in order to better understand the causes of this disadvantage, and the potential reproductive needs of migrants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 226-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828951/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39927442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Ignoring international alerts? The routinization of episiotomy in France in the 1980s and 1990s 无视国际警报?20世纪八九十年代法国外阴切开术的常规化
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.002
Lola Mirouse

As scientific evidence from the UK and the USA in the 1980s was questioning the usefulness of episiotomy, the rate in France increased from 38% in 1981 to 58.4% in 1996. In 1996, the World Health Organization recommended limiting the episiotomy rate to 10%. This article aims to examine this paradox through an analysis of the French medical debate on episiotomy during the 1980s and 1990s. Drawing on an analytical corpus composed of 192 articles published in French professional journals of obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives, it shows that the majority of these health professionals considered episiotomy to be a preventive intervention. The most influential professional organizations and experts manage to refute most of the international alerts on the limitations and side effects of episiotomy through the constant production of new justifications and competing knowledge for the procedure. In the 1980s, episiotomy was seen as a means to prevent tearing and thus avoid perineal dysfunction. Episiotomy and perineal re-education (which developed into a new health sector) were put forward as ‘the’ solution to the problem. From the mid-1990s onwards, the focus shifted from the mother to the baby as episiotomy was promoted as a way to reduce the risk of newborn mortality and morbidity. This article shows that the alerts and controversies on the assumed iatrogenic effects of biomedical technologies and practices were silenced through efficient and dynamic production of competing knowledge about their assumed benefits.

由于20世纪80年代来自英国和美国的科学证据质疑外阴切开术的有效性,法国的这一比例从1981年的38%上升到1996年的58.4%。1996年,世界卫生组织建议将外阴切开术的比例限制在10%。本文旨在通过分析20世纪80年代和90年代法国关于会阴切开术的医学辩论来检验这一悖论。根据法国妇产科医生和助产士专业期刊上发表的192篇文章的分析语料,研究表明,这些保健专业人员中的大多数认为外阴切开术是一种预防性干预措施。最具影响力的专业组织和专家通过不断提出新的理由和竞争性知识,设法驳斥了大多数关于外阴切开术局限性和副作用的国际警告。在20世纪80年代,会阴切开术被视为防止撕裂的手段,从而避免会阴功能障碍。外阴切开术和会阴再教育(已发展成为一个新的保健部门)被认为是解决这一问题的"办法"。从20世纪90年代中期开始,随着外阴切开术被推广为降低新生儿死亡率和发病率的一种方法,焦点从母亲转移到婴儿。这篇文章表明,通过有效和动态地生产关于生物医学技术和实践的假设益处的竞争性知识,对假定的医源性效应的警告和争议被沉默了。
{"title":"Ignoring international alerts? The routinization of episiotomy in France in the 1980s and 1990s","authors":"Lola Mirouse","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As scientific evidence from the UK and the USA in the 1980s was questioning the usefulness of episiotomy, the rate in France increased from 38% in 1981 to 58.4% in 1996. In 1996, the World Health Organization recommended limiting the episiotomy rate to 10%. This article aims to examine this paradox through an analysis of the French medical debate on episiotomy during the 1980s and 1990s. Drawing on an analytical corpus composed of 192 articles published in French professional journals of obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives, it shows that the majority of these health professionals considered episiotomy to be a preventive intervention. The most influential professional organizations and experts manage to refute most of the international alerts on the limitations and side effects of episiotomy through the constant production of new justifications and competing knowledge for the procedure. In the 1980s, episiotomy was seen as a means to prevent tearing and thus avoid perineal dysfunction. Episiotomy and perineal re-education (which developed into a new health sector) were put forward as ‘the’ solution to the problem. From the mid-1990s onwards, the focus shifted from the mother to the baby as episiotomy was promoted as a way to reduce the risk of newborn mortality and morbidity. This article shows that the alerts and controversies on the assumed iatrogenic effects of biomedical technologies and practices were silenced through efficient and dynamic production of competing knowledge about their assumed benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 42-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39555566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Silences, omissions and oversimplification? The UK debate on mitochondrial donation 沉默、遗漏和过度简化?英国关于线粒体捐赠的辩论
Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.005
Cathy Herbrand

Drawing on scholarship from ignorance studies, this paper uses the case of the UK debates on mitochondrial donation (2012–2015) to emphasize the importance of deploying an analysis of ignorance that goes beyond medical and safety concerns when scrutinizing debates or campaigns around new reproductive technologies. In contrast to what happened with previous reproductive health treatments or drugs, the potential medical risks of mitochondrial donation were explicitly acknowledged and examined during its public and parliamentary discussions. However, I show, using the concepts of ‘acknowledged unknowns’ and ‘ignored knowns’, how the attention drawn to the medical risks contributed to obscuring the assessment of its economic and social impacts by silencing key knowledge regarding the limitations of mitochondrial donation in relation to the potential beneficiaries, the scope of the techniques, their alternatives and their costs. This article therefore calls for more systematic use of an integrated analytical framework of ignorance to be applied in the field of reproductive public policies, paying particular attention not only to the ways that medical risks are addressed, but also to the type of knowledge and disciplines this allows to silence or side-line in the framing and assessment of new biotechnologies.

借鉴无知研究的学术成果,本文以英国关于线粒体捐赠的辩论(2012-2015)为例,强调在审查围绕新生殖技术的辩论或活动时,对超越医疗和安全问题的无知进行分析的重要性。与以前的生殖健康治疗或药物相比,线粒体捐赠的潜在医疗风险在公众和议会讨论中得到了明确承认和审查。然而,我通过使用“已知的未知”和“被忽视的已知”的概念,展示了对医疗风险的关注是如何通过沉默有关线粒体捐赠与潜在受益者、技术范围、替代方案及其成本相关的局限性的关键知识,从而模糊了对其经济和社会影响的评估。因此,本文呼吁在生殖公共政策领域更系统地使用无知的综合分析框架,不仅要特别注意解决医疗风险的方式,还要注意在新生物技术的框架和评估中允许沉默或边缘化的知识和学科类型。
{"title":"Silences, omissions and oversimplification? The UK debate on mitochondrial donation","authors":"Cathy Herbrand","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drawing on scholarship from ignorance studies, this paper uses the case of the UK debates on mitochondrial donation (2012–2015) to emphasize the importance of deploying an analysis of ignorance that goes beyond medical and safety concerns when scrutinizing debates or campaigns around new reproductive technologies. In contrast to what happened with previous reproductive health treatments or drugs, the potential medical risks of mitochondrial donation were explicitly acknowledged and examined during its public and parliamentary discussions. However, I show, using the concepts of ‘acknowledged unknowns’ and ‘ignored knowns’, how the attention drawn to the medical risks contributed to obscuring the assessment of its economic and social impacts by silencing key knowledge regarding the limitations of mitochondrial donation in relation to the potential beneficiaries, the scope of the techniques, their alternatives and their costs. This article therefore calls for more systematic use of an integrated analytical framework of ignorance to be applied in the field of reproductive public policies, paying particular attention not only to the ways that medical risks are addressed, but also to the type of knowledge and disciplines this allows to silence or side-line in the framing and assessment of new biotechnologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39704914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1