Clinical characteristics and patient treatment satisfaction with Humalog U-200 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an observational study.

IF 2.4 Journal of Drug Assessment Pub Date : 2019-12-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21556660.2019.1704415
Jil Mamza, Uchena Anyanwagu, Mohammed Alkharaiji, Iskandar Idris
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and patient treatment satisfaction with Humalog U-200 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an observational study.","authors":"Jil Mamza,&nbsp;Uchena Anyanwagu,&nbsp;Mohammed Alkharaiji,&nbsp;Iskandar Idris","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1704415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There are limited data on the real-world evidence of Humalog 200 units/ml KwikPen (U-200) insulin. We assessed the use of U-200 insulin in UK routine clinical practice to provide information on clinical characteristics, treatment satisfaction and short-term clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Nine patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated U-200 in secondary care and a further 12 identified from primary care electronic database were enrolled. A treatment satisfaction questionnaire was administered to the 19 secondary care patients. Follow-up data on clinical parameters were collected at 3 and 6 months following initial U-200 insulin administration and the data were used to assess changes in clinical outcomes from baseline. <b>Results:</b> Secondary care patients had a mean age 60 ± 11 years, mean HbA1c of 8.6% ± 1.3% and a mean BMI of 39.7 ± 5.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup> at baseline. Primary care database patients had a mean age 57 ± 13 years, mean HbA1c 10.3% ± 1.7 and a mean BMI 42.3 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The nine participants' responses to the questionnaire suggested a high preference for U-200 over a previous mealtime insulin pen (PMIP). On average, the patients agreed that U-200 was quicker to inject, had a better controlled home blood glucose reading and less discomfort at the injection site compared to a PMIP. Patients were willing to continue with their U-200 treatment. No significant HbA1c reduction was observed at 3 months in the secondary care group (-0.5%), but marked significant reduction in HbA1c was seen at 3 months in the primary care dataset to (-2.8%; <i>p</i> < .0004). There was also some suggestion of weight loss in both the secondary and primary care groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Humalog U-200 insulin users were comprised mainly of older patients with diabetes complications and high HbA1c levels at the time of U-200 initiation. Overall, U-200 improved patients' satisfaction with diabetes treatment and short-term metabolic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":"9 1","pages":"8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1704415","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1704415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on the real-world evidence of Humalog 200 units/ml KwikPen (U-200) insulin. We assessed the use of U-200 insulin in UK routine clinical practice to provide information on clinical characteristics, treatment satisfaction and short-term clinical outcomes. Methods: Nine patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated U-200 in secondary care and a further 12 identified from primary care electronic database were enrolled. A treatment satisfaction questionnaire was administered to the 19 secondary care patients. Follow-up data on clinical parameters were collected at 3 and 6 months following initial U-200 insulin administration and the data were used to assess changes in clinical outcomes from baseline. Results: Secondary care patients had a mean age 60 ± 11 years, mean HbA1c of 8.6% ± 1.3% and a mean BMI of 39.7 ± 5.3 kg/m2 at baseline. Primary care database patients had a mean age 57 ± 13 years, mean HbA1c 10.3% ± 1.7 and a mean BMI 42.3 ± 3.8 kg/m2. The nine participants' responses to the questionnaire suggested a high preference for U-200 over a previous mealtime insulin pen (PMIP). On average, the patients agreed that U-200 was quicker to inject, had a better controlled home blood glucose reading and less discomfort at the injection site compared to a PMIP. Patients were willing to continue with their U-200 treatment. No significant HbA1c reduction was observed at 3 months in the secondary care group (-0.5%), but marked significant reduction in HbA1c was seen at 3 months in the primary care dataset to (-2.8%; p < .0004). There was also some suggestion of weight loss in both the secondary and primary care groups. Conclusion: Humalog U-200 insulin users were comprised mainly of older patients with diabetes complications and high HbA1c levels at the time of U-200 initiation. Overall, U-200 improved patients' satisfaction with diabetes treatment and short-term metabolic outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Humalog U-200治疗2型糖尿病患者的临床特点及患者治疗满意度:一项观察性研究。
背景:Humalog 200单位/毫升KwikPen (U-200)胰岛素的实际证据数据有限。我们评估了U-200胰岛素在英国常规临床实践中的使用,以提供有关临床特征、治疗满意度和短期临床结果的信息。方法:9例2型糖尿病患者在二级保健中开始使用U-200,另外12例从初级保健电子数据库中确定。对19例二级护理患者进行治疗满意度问卷调查。在首次使用U-200胰岛素后的3个月和6个月收集临床参数的随访数据,并使用这些数据评估从基线到临床结果的变化。结果:二级护理患者的平均年龄为60±11岁,基线时平均HbA1c为8.6%±1.3%,平均BMI为39.7±5.3 kg/m2。初级保健数据库患者的平均年龄为57±13岁,平均HbA1c为10.3%±1.7,平均BMI为42.3±3.8 kg/m2。九名参与者对问卷的回答表明,他们对U-200的偏好高于之前的餐时胰岛素笔(PMIP)。平均而言,患者同意U-200注射速度更快,与pip相比,家庭血糖读数控制得更好,注射部位的不适也更少。患者愿意继续他们的U-200治疗。二级护理组在3个月时未观察到明显的HbA1c降低(-0.5%),但在初级护理组3个月时HbA1c显著降低(-2.8%;p结论:U-200胰岛素的使用者主要是年龄较大且开始使用U-200时HbA1c水平较高的糖尿病并发症患者。总体而言,U-200提高了患者对糖尿病治疗和短期代谢结局的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1