Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses.

IF 2.4 Journal of Drug Assessment Pub Date : 2022-09-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21556660.2022.2125727
Yue Zhang, Philippe Hubert, Cédric Hubert
{"title":"Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses.","authors":"Yue Zhang,&nbsp;Philippe Hubert,&nbsp;Cédric Hubert","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2022.2125727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Discovery of falsified Symbicort 320/9 Turbohaler identified in the UK in 2013 demonstrated that falsified dry powder inhalers were also present in the European market. This work aimed to investigate the current situation of formoterol-containing dry powder inhalers in Europe and North Africa by assessing their aerodynamic performance profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of eight registered formoterol-based dry powder inhalers over the European and North African markets were involved in this study, including the reference drug Foradil. Samples were prepared using a multistage liquid impinger (MsLI) and further analyzed by a validated HPLC-UV method to determine the delivered and the fine particle doses (FPDs). This study also examined the impact of freezing-thawing cycles on sample stability in terms of analytical purpose handling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No substandard dry powder inhalers were identified among the medicinal products involved in this work. The delivered dose (DD) of assessed drugs varied from 8.33 to 9.69 µg, while the FPD was between 1.86 and 3.35 µg. As expected, this work confirmed that the capsule composition and the barrier properties of the primary packaging can affect the FPD of dry powder for inhalation use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FPD of products C and B was, respectively, 17.4 and 14.2% superior to Foradil, products D and H had the closest values compared to the original drug, and product F was 34.5% inferior. Additionally, this work showed that a high FPD can be achieved using HPMC capsules and moisture-impermeable primary packaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/60/d4/IJDA_11_2125727.PMC9543106.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2022.2125727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Discovery of falsified Symbicort 320/9 Turbohaler identified in the UK in 2013 demonstrated that falsified dry powder inhalers were also present in the European market. This work aimed to investigate the current situation of formoterol-containing dry powder inhalers in Europe and North Africa by assessing their aerodynamic performance profile.

Methods: A total of eight registered formoterol-based dry powder inhalers over the European and North African markets were involved in this study, including the reference drug Foradil. Samples were prepared using a multistage liquid impinger (MsLI) and further analyzed by a validated HPLC-UV method to determine the delivered and the fine particle doses (FPDs). This study also examined the impact of freezing-thawing cycles on sample stability in terms of analytical purpose handling.

Results: No substandard dry powder inhalers were identified among the medicinal products involved in this work. The delivered dose (DD) of assessed drugs varied from 8.33 to 9.69 µg, while the FPD was between 1.86 and 3.35 µg. As expected, this work confirmed that the capsule composition and the barrier properties of the primary packaging can affect the FPD of dry powder for inhalation use.

Conclusions: The FPD of products C and B was, respectively, 17.4 and 14.2% superior to Foradil, products D and H had the closest values compared to the original drug, and product F was 34.5% inferior. Additionally, this work showed that a high FPD can be achieved using HPMC capsules and moisture-impermeable primary packaging.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对欧盟和北非市场上可能不合格的干粉吸入器的调查——对输送剂量和细颗粒剂量的评估。
目的:2013年在英国发现伪造的辛比柯320/9涡轮增压器,这表明欧洲市场上也存在伪造的干粉吸入器。这项工作旨在通过评估其气动性能概况,调查欧洲和北非含福莫特罗干粉吸入器的现状。方法:本研究涉及欧洲和北非市场上注册的8种福摩特罗干粉吸入器,包括参比药福拉地尔。采用多级液体冲击器(MsLI)制备样品,并采用高效液相色谱-紫外(HPLC-UV)方法进行分析,以确定递送剂量和细颗粒剂量(fpd)。本研究还考察了冻融循环对样品稳定性分析目的处理方面的影响。结果:未发现不合格的干粉吸入器。给药剂量(DD)在8.33 ~ 9.69µg之间,FPD在1.86 ~ 3.35µg之间。正如预期的那样,这项工作证实了胶囊组成和初级包装的阻隔性能会影响吸入用干粉的FPD。结论:产品C和B的FPD分别比原药高17.4%和14.2%,产品D和H与原药最接近,产品F比原药低34.5%。此外,这项工作表明,使用HPMC胶囊和不透湿的初级包装可以实现高FPD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1