Efficacy of lofexidine for mitigating opioid withdrawal symptoms: results from two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

IF 2.4 Journal of Drug Assessment Pub Date : 2020-01-08 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21556660.2019.1704416
Danesh Alam, Carlos Tirado, Mark Pirner, Thomas Clinch
{"title":"Efficacy of lofexidine for mitigating opioid withdrawal symptoms: results from two randomized, placebo-controlled trials.","authors":"Danesh Alam, Carlos Tirado, Mark Pirner, Thomas Clinch","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1704416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Fear of opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) often dissuades opioid discontinuation. Lofexidine is an FDA-approved, alpha<sub>2</sub>-adrenergic receptor agonist for treatment of OWS. Pivotal trial results from the per-protocol statistical analyses have been published. However, the FDA prescribing information presents these efficacy results using a different, standardized statistical approach that does not transform data or impute missing values. This analysis is easier to interpret and allows comparison across studies. This reanalysis is presented here. <b>Methods:</b> Studies were double-blind, placebo-controlled for 7 days in Study 1 and 5 days in Study 2. Opioid-dependent adults received placebo or lofexidine; efficacy was assessed using the Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale of Gossop (SOWS-G) daily. <b>Results:</b> Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 602) mean SOWS-G scores were 6.1 (SE: 0.35), 6.5 (SE: 0.34), and 8.8 (SE: 0.47) over Days 1-7 for lofexidine 2.88 mg/day, 2.16 mg/day, and placebo, respectively (for 2.88, <i>p</i> < .0001; for 2.16 mg, <i>p</i> < .0001). Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 264) mean SOWS-G scores were 7.0 (SE: 0.44) and 8.9 (SE: 0.48) over Days 1-5 for lofexidine 2.16 mg/day and placebo, respectively (<i>p</i> = .0037). Median time to treatment discontinuation was approximately 2 days later with lofexidine treatment than with placebo and significantly more lofexidine-treated subjects completed the studies. Hypotension and bradycardia were more common with lofexidine. More placebo subjects withdrew prematurely for lack of efficacy. <b>Conclusion:</b> This simplified analysis confirmed previous per-protocol results, that lofexidine better reduces OWS severity and increases retention compared with placebo in opioid-dependent adults. These results are robust and comparable across studies using various methods of analysis. <b>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</b>: Study 1, NCT01863186; Study 2 NCT00235729. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/.</p>","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":"9 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1704416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Fear of opioid withdrawal syndrome (OWS) often dissuades opioid discontinuation. Lofexidine is an FDA-approved, alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist for treatment of OWS. Pivotal trial results from the per-protocol statistical analyses have been published. However, the FDA prescribing information presents these efficacy results using a different, standardized statistical approach that does not transform data or impute missing values. This analysis is easier to interpret and allows comparison across studies. This reanalysis is presented here. Methods: Studies were double-blind, placebo-controlled for 7 days in Study 1 and 5 days in Study 2. Opioid-dependent adults received placebo or lofexidine; efficacy was assessed using the Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale of Gossop (SOWS-G) daily. Results: Study 1 (N = 602) mean SOWS-G scores were 6.1 (SE: 0.35), 6.5 (SE: 0.34), and 8.8 (SE: 0.47) over Days 1-7 for lofexidine 2.88 mg/day, 2.16 mg/day, and placebo, respectively (for 2.88, p < .0001; for 2.16 mg, p < .0001). Study 2 (N = 264) mean SOWS-G scores were 7.0 (SE: 0.44) and 8.9 (SE: 0.48) over Days 1-5 for lofexidine 2.16 mg/day and placebo, respectively (p = .0037). Median time to treatment discontinuation was approximately 2 days later with lofexidine treatment than with placebo and significantly more lofexidine-treated subjects completed the studies. Hypotension and bradycardia were more common with lofexidine. More placebo subjects withdrew prematurely for lack of efficacy. Conclusion: This simplified analysis confirmed previous per-protocol results, that lofexidine better reduces OWS severity and increases retention compared with placebo in opioid-dependent adults. These results are robust and comparable across studies using various methods of analysis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: Study 1, NCT01863186; Study 2 NCT00235729. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洛非西定缓解阿片类药物戒断症状的疗效:两项随机安慰剂对照试验的结果。
目的:对阿片类药物戒断综合征(OWS)的恐惧往往会阻碍阿片类药物的停用。洛非西定是一种经美国食品及药物管理局批准的α2-肾上腺素能受体激动剂,可用于治疗OWS。按协议统计分析的关键试验结果已经公布。不过,美国食品及药物管理局的处方信息采用了一种不同的标准化统计方法来介绍这些疗效结果,这种方法不转换数据或计算缺失值。这种分析方法更易于解释,并可对不同研究进行比较。本文介绍了这种重新分析方法。研究方法研究 1 和研究 2 分别进行了为期 7 天和 5 天的双盲安慰剂对照研究。阿片类药物依赖成人接受安慰剂或洛非西定治疗;每天使用戈索普阿片类药物戒断简易量表(SOWS-G)评估疗效。研究结果研究 1(N = 602)中,洛非西定 2.88 毫克/天、2.16 毫克/天和安慰剂在第 1-7 天的平均 SOWS-G 评分分别为 6.1(SE:0.35)、6.5(SE:0.34)和 8.8(SE:0.47)(对于洛非西定 2.88 毫克/天、2.16 毫克/天和 2.88 毫克/天,P = 264)。88, p p N = 264),洛非西定 2.16 毫克/天和安慰剂在第 1-5 天的平均 SOWS-G 评分分别为 7.0(SE:0.44)和 8.9(SE:0.48)(p = .0037)。洛非西定治疗的中位停药时间比安慰剂晚约2天,而且完成研究的洛非西定治疗受试者明显更多。低血压和心动过缓在使用洛非西定时更为常见。因疗效不佳而提前退出研究的安慰剂受试者更多。结论:这项简化分析证实了之前的按方案治疗结果,即与安慰剂相比,洛非西定能更好地减轻阿片类药物依赖成人的OWS严重程度,并提高保留率。这些结果是可靠的,在采用不同分析方法的研究中具有可比性。ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:研究 1 NCT01863186;研究 2 NCT00235729。网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1