Quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-04-01 Epub Date: 2020-01-29 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08226-7
Jakob O Oreskov, Jakob Burcharth, Andreas F Nielsen, Sarah Ekeloef, Jakob Kleif, Ismail Gögenur
{"title":"Quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Jakob O Oreskov, Jakob Burcharth, Andreas F Nielsen, Sarah Ekeloef, Jakob Kleif, Ismail Gögenur","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08226-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Major emergency abdominal surgery results in high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe patient-reported quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS A prospective observational cohort study of patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery at a University Hospital was conducted in the period between November 2016 and February 2017. Patients were interviewed using the 15-item questionnaire Quality of Recovery (QoR- 15) six times over the first 30 postoperative days. Patients' maximum score of QoR-15 ranging from 0- 150 were divided into four groups depending on recovery status going from poor (score of 0-89), moderate (score of 90-121), good (score of 122-135) to excellent (score of 136-150) recovery. RESULTS A total of 37 patients were included in the trial. At postoperative day (POD) 1 the recovery status of the patients was mainly poor to moderate (poor n=8 (22%), moderate n=23 (62%), good n=4 (11%) and excellent n=2 (5%)). 16 (55%) of the patients reported a poor or moderate recovery within the first 7 days after surgery, which advanced to good or excellent recovery (n=19 (68%)) from POD 14. The patients were not fully recovered at POD 30 (n=18 (62%) had an excellent recovery). CONCLUSIONS Recovery measured by QoR-15 is substantially affected after major emergency abdominal surgery even after 14- and 30 days postoperatively. The patients were poor or only moderately recovered within the first seven postoperative days and only 62% of the patients were fully recovered at postoperative day 30.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08226-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Major emergency abdominal surgery results in high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe patient-reported quality of recovery after major emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS A prospective observational cohort study of patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery at a University Hospital was conducted in the period between November 2016 and February 2017. Patients were interviewed using the 15-item questionnaire Quality of Recovery (QoR- 15) six times over the first 30 postoperative days. Patients' maximum score of QoR-15 ranging from 0- 150 were divided into four groups depending on recovery status going from poor (score of 0-89), moderate (score of 90-121), good (score of 122-135) to excellent (score of 136-150) recovery. RESULTS A total of 37 patients were included in the trial. At postoperative day (POD) 1 the recovery status of the patients was mainly poor to moderate (poor n=8 (22%), moderate n=23 (62%), good n=4 (11%) and excellent n=2 (5%)). 16 (55%) of the patients reported a poor or moderate recovery within the first 7 days after surgery, which advanced to good or excellent recovery (n=19 (68%)) from POD 14. The patients were not fully recovered at POD 30 (n=18 (62%) had an excellent recovery). CONCLUSIONS Recovery measured by QoR-15 is substantially affected after major emergency abdominal surgery even after 14- and 30 days postoperatively. The patients were poor or only moderately recovered within the first seven postoperative days and only 62% of the patients were fully recovered at postoperative day 30.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重大急诊腹部手术后的恢复质量:一项前瞻性观察队列研究
背景:重大急诊腹部手术导致高发病率和死亡率。我们的目的是描述重大急诊腹部手术后患者报告的恢复质量。方法:对2016年11月至2017年2月期间在某大学医院接受重大急诊腹部手术的患者进行前瞻性观察队列研究。在术后前30天内,对患者进行了6次问卷调查,问卷包括15个项目的恢复质量(QoR-15)。将QoR-15总分0 ~ 150分的患者根据恢复状况分为4组,分别为恢复差(0 ~ 89分)、中等(90 ~ 121分)、良好(122 ~ 135分)、良好(136 ~ 150分)。结果:共纳入37例患者。术后1天(POD)患者恢复状况以差至中为主(差n =8[22%],中n =23[62%],好n =4[11%],优n =2[5%])。16例(55%)患者报告术后7天内恢复不佳或中等,从POD 14期进展到良好或极好的恢复(n =19[68%])。患者在POD 30时未完全恢复(n =18[62%]恢复良好)。结论:QoR-15测量的恢复在重大急诊腹部手术后,即使在术后14天和30天也会受到很大影响。患者在术后7天内恢复较差或仅为中度恢复,只有62%的患者在术后30天完全恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1