Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes.

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2021-01-12 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08664-2
P. Bianchi, G. Giuliani, A. Salaj, L. Ferraro, E. Opocher, F. Toti, G. Formisano
{"title":"Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes.","authors":"P. Bianchi, G. Giuliani, A. Salaj, L. Ferraro, E. Opocher, F. Toti, G. Formisano","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08664-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nComplete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colectomy increase the technical complexity of a laparoscopic approach especially when an intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) is associated. The robotic platform, with its intrinsic technical advantages, could potentially overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopy. This study aimed to describe the robotic bottom-up technique and to evaluate short-terms outcomes of robotic right colectomy (RRC) with CME and IA.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData from patients who underwent RRC for cancer with bottom-up suprapubic approach from October 2016 to April 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative outcomes and complications, conversion rate, 30-day postoperative outcomes, incisional hernia rate and pathological outcomes were the variables assessed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 109 patients were submitted to bottom-up suprapubic approach for RRC with CME and IA during the study period. Mean operative time was 179 min, no intraoperative complications were observed, and the conversion rate was 3.6%. Mean postoperative stay was 4.6 days and the overall 30-day complication rate was 15.6%. Thirteen patients (12%) had minor complications, while major postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (3.6%). Anastomotic leak was recorded in 1 patient (0.9%) and the 30-day re-admission rate was 0.9%. Mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.6. Incisional hernia rate at the specimen extraction site was 0.9%.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBottom-up approach for RRC with CME and IA carries a low rate of conversions, intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08664-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colectomy increase the technical complexity of a laparoscopic approach especially when an intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) is associated. The robotic platform, with its intrinsic technical advantages, could potentially overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopy. This study aimed to describe the robotic bottom-up technique and to evaluate short-terms outcomes of robotic right colectomy (RRC) with CME and IA. METHODS Data from patients who underwent RRC for cancer with bottom-up suprapubic approach from October 2016 to April 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative outcomes and complications, conversion rate, 30-day postoperative outcomes, incisional hernia rate and pathological outcomes were the variables assessed. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were submitted to bottom-up suprapubic approach for RRC with CME and IA during the study period. Mean operative time was 179 min, no intraoperative complications were observed, and the conversion rate was 3.6%. Mean postoperative stay was 4.6 days and the overall 30-day complication rate was 15.6%. Thirteen patients (12%) had minor complications, while major postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (3.6%). Anastomotic leak was recorded in 1 patient (0.9%) and the 30-day re-admission rate was 0.9%. Mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 22.6. Incisional hernia rate at the specimen extraction site was 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS Bottom-up approach for RRC with CME and IA carries a low rate of conversions, intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人右结肠切除术的自底向上耻骨上入路:技术方面和初步结果。
背景完全中结肠切除术(CME)用于右半结肠切除术增加了腹腔镜手术的技术复杂性,尤其是当与体内吻合(IA)相关时。机器人平台凭借其固有的技术优势,有可能克服传统腹腔镜的局限性。本研究旨在描述机器人自底向上技术,并评估机器人右结肠切除术(RRC)与CME和IA的短期结果。前瞻性收集并回顾性分析了2016年10月至2020年4月接受癌症自底向上地耻骨上入路RRC的患者的数据。术中结果和并发症、转化率、术后30天结果、切口疝发生率和病理结果是评估的变量。结果在研究期间,共有109名患者接受了自下而上的耻骨上入路治疗伴有CME和IA的RRC。平均手术时间179min,未观察到术中并发症,转化率为3.6%。平均术后住院4.6天,30天并发症发生率为15.6%。13例(12%)患者有轻微并发症,术后主要并发症4例(3.6%),吻合口瘘1例(0.9%),30天再入院率0.9%,平均淋巴结数22.6个。标本提取部位的切口疝发生率为0.9%。结论CME和IA的RRC自下而上入路转化率低,术中和短期术后并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1