Avatrombopag, an Alternate Treatment Option to Reduce Platelet Transfusions in Patients with Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease-Integrated Analyses of 2 Phase 3 Studies.

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2020-01-25 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/5421632
Fred Poordad, Norah A Terrault, Naim Alkhouri, Wei Tian, Lee F Allen, Mordechai Rabinovitz
{"title":"Avatrombopag, an Alternate Treatment Option to Reduce Platelet Transfusions in Patients with Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease-Integrated Analyses of 2 Phase 3 Studies.","authors":"Fred Poordad,&nbsp;Norah A Terrault,&nbsp;Naim Alkhouri,&nbsp;Wei Tian,&nbsp;Lee F Allen,&nbsp;Mordechai Rabinovitz","doi":"10.1155/2020/5421632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Thrombocytopenia complicates the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures with a bleeding risk. Until recently, prophylactic platelet transfusion was the only treatment option, but has significant safety and efficacy limitations. Phase 3 data demonstrated the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions for bleeding, supporting its recent approval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Integrated analyses of pooled data (<i>N</i> = 435) from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies assessed the original efficacy endpoints. Additional analyses included subgroup analyses, alternate Baseline platelet count definitions, and another efficacy endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Avatrombopag was superior to placebo in increasing patients not requiring a platelet transfusion or rescue procedure, those achieving a platelet count ≥50 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L on Procedure Day, and the change in platelet counts from Baseline. The avatrombopag treatment effect was consistently positive across clinically important disease and Baseline clinical characteristic subgroups, and using alternate Baseline platelet count cohort definitions. Similarly, more avatrombopag-treated patients achieved ≥50 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L platelets with an increase of ≥20 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L from Baseline. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between avatrombopag and placebo. Further, safety data demonstrated a low risk for thromboembolic events and hepatotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These integrated analyses confirmed the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions or rescue procedures for bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia and CLD scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure, and its tolerable safety profile. Importantly, these data warrant reconsideration of clinical decision making regarding the need to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD. This trial was registered with NCT01972529 and NCT01976104.</p>","PeriodicalId":46297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"5421632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5421632","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5421632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Aims: Thrombocytopenia complicates the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures with a bleeding risk. Until recently, prophylactic platelet transfusion was the only treatment option, but has significant safety and efficacy limitations. Phase 3 data demonstrated the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions for bleeding, supporting its recent approval.

Methods: Integrated analyses of pooled data (N = 435) from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies assessed the original efficacy endpoints. Additional analyses included subgroup analyses, alternate Baseline platelet count definitions, and another efficacy endpoint.

Results: Avatrombopag was superior to placebo in increasing patients not requiring a platelet transfusion or rescue procedure, those achieving a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L on Procedure Day, and the change in platelet counts from Baseline. The avatrombopag treatment effect was consistently positive across clinically important disease and Baseline clinical characteristic subgroups, and using alternate Baseline platelet count cohort definitions. Similarly, more avatrombopag-treated patients achieved ≥50 × 109/L platelets with an increase of ≥20 × 109/L from Baseline. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between avatrombopag and placebo. Further, safety data demonstrated a low risk for thromboembolic events and hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion: These integrated analyses confirmed the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions or rescue procedures for bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia and CLD scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure, and its tolerable safety profile. Importantly, these data warrant reconsideration of clinical decision making regarding the need to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD. This trial was registered with NCT01972529 and NCT01976104.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血小板减少和慢性肝病患者减少血小板输注的另一种治疗选择——阿伐罗巴格——2项3期研究的综合分析
目的:血小板减少使慢性肝病(CLD)患者接受有出血风险的侵入性手术的管理复杂化。直到最近,预防性血小板输注是唯一的治疗选择,但具有明显的安全性和有效性限制。3期数据显示,avatrombopag在减少血小板输注出血方面优于安慰剂,支持其最近的批准。方法:对两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期研究的合并数据(N = 435)进行综合分析,评估原始疗效终点。其他分析包括亚组分析、备选基线血小板计数定义和另一个疗效终点。结果:Avatrombopag在增加不需要血小板输注或抢救手术的患者、在手术当天血小板计数≥50 × 109/L的患者以及血小板计数自基线的变化方面优于安慰剂。在临床重要疾病和基线临床特征亚组以及使用替代基线血小板计数队列定义的情况下,阿伐洛巴格治疗效果始终为阳性。同样,更多阿伐波帕格治疗的患者血小板达到≥50 × 109/L,比基线增加≥20 × 109/L。不良事件的发生率和严重程度在阿伐洛巴格和安慰剂之间相似。此外,安全性数据显示血栓栓塞事件和肝毒性的风险较低。结论:这些综合分析证实了avatrombopag在减少血小板输注或对计划接受侵入性手术的血小板减少和CLD患者出血的抢救程序方面优于安慰剂,以及其可耐受的安全性。重要的是,这些数据需要重新考虑临床决策是否需要治疗CLD患者的血小板减少症。该试验注册号为NCT01972529和NCT01976104。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hepatology
International Journal of Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the medical, surgical, pathological, biochemical, and physiological aspects of hepatology, as well as the management of disorders affecting the liver, gallbladder, biliary tree, and pancreas.
期刊最新文献
Utilization of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions. Anatomical Variations of the Gallbladder and Bile Ducts: An MRI Study. The Role of Gut Microbiota Modification in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Treatment Strategies. Evaluation of Noninvasive Tools for Predicting Esophageal Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town. Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure: A Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1