Evaluating the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide among Latina Adolescents using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

IF 11.7 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-18 DOI:10.1037/qup0000131
Lauren Gulbas, Hannah Szlyk, Luis H Zayas
{"title":"Evaluating the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide among Latina Adolescents using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Lauren Gulbas, Hannah Szlyk, Luis H Zayas","doi":"10.1037/qup0000131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide (IPTS) has emerged as an empirically supported theory of suicide risk, yet few studies have utilized IPTS to examine the suicidal behaviors of Latina adolescents. In this study, we explore the cultural and developmental appropriateness, as well as the explanatory fit, of IPTS within a sample of Latina adolescents. Data for this project were drawn from qualitative interviews conducted with Latina adolescents with (n=30) and without (n=30) histories of attempted suicide. We employed a deductive qualitative approach to define and compare core constructs of IPTS (perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and acquired capability), and then use qualitative comparative analysis to evaluate how core constructs were linked with the occurrence of a suicide attempt. Consistent with IPTS, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and acquired capability were present in 20 of the 30 adolescents who had attempted suicide, and absent in 22 of the 30 adolescents with no lifetime history of suicidal behaviors. Notably, alternative combinations of IPTS constructs were found in 10 cases of adolescents who attempted suicide, suggesting a need to adjust IPTS to fit the developmental and cultural contexts of Latina teens. Although our results suggest predominantly positive support for IPTS, participants varied in terms of how their experiences resonated with the conceptual definitions put forward by the theory. Ultimately, our findings point to the ways in which developmental tensions are exacerbated by broader sociocultural dynamics, contributing to a broader understanding of suicide risk among ethnic minority adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":92131,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"6 3","pages":"297-311"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015267/pdf/nihms-1029288.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide (IPTS) has emerged as an empirically supported theory of suicide risk, yet few studies have utilized IPTS to examine the suicidal behaviors of Latina adolescents. In this study, we explore the cultural and developmental appropriateness, as well as the explanatory fit, of IPTS within a sample of Latina adolescents. Data for this project were drawn from qualitative interviews conducted with Latina adolescents with (n=30) and without (n=30) histories of attempted suicide. We employed a deductive qualitative approach to define and compare core constructs of IPTS (perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and acquired capability), and then use qualitative comparative analysis to evaluate how core constructs were linked with the occurrence of a suicide attempt. Consistent with IPTS, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and acquired capability were present in 20 of the 30 adolescents who had attempted suicide, and absent in 22 of the 30 adolescents with no lifetime history of suicidal behaviors. Notably, alternative combinations of IPTS constructs were found in 10 cases of adolescents who attempted suicide, suggesting a need to adjust IPTS to fit the developmental and cultural contexts of Latina teens. Although our results suggest predominantly positive support for IPTS, participants varied in terms of how their experiences resonated with the conceptual definitions put forward by the theory. Ultimately, our findings point to the ways in which developmental tensions are exacerbated by broader sociocultural dynamics, contributing to a broader understanding of suicide risk among ethnic minority adolescents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用定性比较分析评估拉丁裔青少年自杀的人际心理理论。
自杀的人际心理理论(IPTS)已成为一种得到经验支持的自杀风险理论,但很少有研究利用 IPTS 来研究拉丁裔青少年的自杀行为。在本研究中,我们以拉丁裔青少年为样本,探讨了 IPTS 在文化和发展方面的适宜性以及解释性。本项目的数据来自对有自杀未遂史(30 人)和无自杀未遂史(30 人)的拉丁裔青少年进行的定性访谈。我们采用了一种演绎定性方法来定义和比较 IPTS 的核心结构(感知到的负担、受挫的归属感和获得的能力),然后使用定性比较分析来评估核心结构如何与自杀未遂的发生联系在一起。与 IPTS 一致的是,在 30 名企图自杀的青少年中,有 20 人存在 "感知到的负担"、"挫败的归属感 "和 "获得的能力",而在 30 名终生没有自杀行为史的青少年中,有 22 人不存在这些特征。值得注意的是,在 10 例企图自杀的青少年中发现了 IPTS 构建的其他组合,这表明有必要对 IPTS 进行调整,以适应拉丁裔青少年的成长和文化背景。尽管我们的研究结果表明 IPTS 主要得到了积极的支持,但参与者的经历与该理论所提出的概念定义的共鸣程度各不相同。最终,我们的研究结果表明,更广泛的社会文化动态会加剧发展中的紧张关系,从而有助于更广泛地了解少数民族青少年的自杀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Qualitative Interview in Psychology and the Study of Social Change: Sexual Identity Development, Minority Stress, and Health in the Generations Study. Evaluating the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide among Latina Adolescents using Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Is It Time to Share Qualitative Research Data? How Qualitative Methods Contribute to Intervention Adaptation: An HIV Risk Reduction Example. An account from the inside: Examining the emotional impact of qualitative research through the lens of "insider" research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1