Effect of food limitation and reproductive activity on fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels in banded mongooses.

IF 2.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences BMC Ecology Pub Date : 2020-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12898-020-00280-z
Pete N Laver, André Ganswindt, Stefanie B Ganswindt, Kathleen A Alexander
{"title":"Effect of food limitation and reproductive activity on fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels in banded mongooses.","authors":"Pete N Laver,&nbsp;André Ganswindt,&nbsp;Stefanie B Ganswindt,&nbsp;Kathleen A Alexander","doi":"10.1186/s12898-020-00280-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucocorticoids mediate responses to perceived stressors, thereby restoring homeostasis. However, prolonged glucocorticoid elevation may cause homeostatic overload. Using extensive field investigations of banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) groups in northern Botswana, we assessed the influence of reproduction, predation risk, and food limitation on apparent homeostatic overload (n=13 groups, 1542 samples from 268 animals). We experimentally manipulated reproduction and regulated food supply in captive mongooses, and compared their glucocorticoid responses to those obtained from free-living groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the population level, variation in glucocorticoid levels in free-living mongooses was explained by food limitation: fecal organic matter, recent rainfall, and access to concentrated anthropogenic food resources. Soil macrofauna density and reproductive events explained less and predation risk very little variation in glucocorticoid levels. Reproduction and its associated challenges alone (under regulated feeding conditions) increased glucocorticoid levels 19-fold in a captive group. Among free-living groups, glucocorticoid elevation was seasonal (occurring in late dry season or early wet season when natural food resources were less available), but the timing of peak glucocorticoid production was moderated by access to anthropogenic resources (groups with fewer anthropogenic food sources had peaks earlier in dry seasons). Peak months represented 12- and 16-fold increases in glucocorticoids relative to nadir months with some animals exhibiting 100-fold increases. Relative to the captive group nadir, some free-living groups exhibited 60-fold increases in peak glucocorticoid levels with some animals exhibiting up to 800-fold increases. Most of these animals exhibited 1- to 10-fold increases relative to the captive animal peak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Banded mongooses exhibit seasonal chronic glucocorticoid elevation, associated primarily with food limitation and secondarily with reproduction. Magnitude and duration of this elevation suggests that this may be maladaptive for some animals, with possible fitness consequences. In late dry season, this population may face a convergence of stressors (food limitation, agonistic encounters at concentrated food resources, evictions, estrus, mate competition, parturition, and predation pressure on pups), which may induce homeostatic overload.</p>","PeriodicalId":9232,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ecology","volume":"20 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12898-020-00280-z","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00280-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Glucocorticoids mediate responses to perceived stressors, thereby restoring homeostasis. However, prolonged glucocorticoid elevation may cause homeostatic overload. Using extensive field investigations of banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) groups in northern Botswana, we assessed the influence of reproduction, predation risk, and food limitation on apparent homeostatic overload (n=13 groups, 1542 samples from 268 animals). We experimentally manipulated reproduction and regulated food supply in captive mongooses, and compared their glucocorticoid responses to those obtained from free-living groups.

Results: At the population level, variation in glucocorticoid levels in free-living mongooses was explained by food limitation: fecal organic matter, recent rainfall, and access to concentrated anthropogenic food resources. Soil macrofauna density and reproductive events explained less and predation risk very little variation in glucocorticoid levels. Reproduction and its associated challenges alone (under regulated feeding conditions) increased glucocorticoid levels 19-fold in a captive group. Among free-living groups, glucocorticoid elevation was seasonal (occurring in late dry season or early wet season when natural food resources were less available), but the timing of peak glucocorticoid production was moderated by access to anthropogenic resources (groups with fewer anthropogenic food sources had peaks earlier in dry seasons). Peak months represented 12- and 16-fold increases in glucocorticoids relative to nadir months with some animals exhibiting 100-fold increases. Relative to the captive group nadir, some free-living groups exhibited 60-fold increases in peak glucocorticoid levels with some animals exhibiting up to 800-fold increases. Most of these animals exhibited 1- to 10-fold increases relative to the captive animal peak.

Conclusions: Banded mongooses exhibit seasonal chronic glucocorticoid elevation, associated primarily with food limitation and secondarily with reproduction. Magnitude and duration of this elevation suggests that this may be maladaptive for some animals, with possible fitness consequences. In late dry season, this population may face a convergence of stressors (food limitation, agonistic encounters at concentrated food resources, evictions, estrus, mate competition, parturition, and predation pressure on pups), which may induce homeostatic overload.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食物限制和繁殖活动对带状猫鼬粪便糖皮质激素代谢水平的影响。
背景:糖皮质激素介导对感知应激源的反应,从而恢复体内平衡。然而,长时间的糖皮质激素升高可能导致体内平衡超载。通过对博茨瓦纳北部带状猫鼬(Mungos mungo)群体的广泛实地调查,我们评估了繁殖、捕食风险和食物限制对表观稳态过载的影响(n=13组,来自268只动物的1542个样本)。我们实验控制了圈养猫鼬的繁殖和食物供应,并将它们的糖皮质激素反应与自由生活的猫鼬进行了比较。结果:在种群水平上,自由生活猫鼬糖皮质激素水平的变化与食物限制有关:粪便有机质、近期降雨和获得集中的人为食物资源。土壤大型动物密度和繁殖事件对糖皮质激素水平变化的解释较少,捕食风险也很小。仅繁殖及其相关的挑战(在调节喂养条件下)就使圈养组的糖皮质激素水平增加了19倍。在自由生活组中,糖皮质激素的升高是季节性的(发生在旱季晚期或雨季早期,此时天然食物资源较少),但糖皮质激素峰值的时间受到人为资源获取的调节(人为食物来源较少的组在旱季达到峰值的时间较早)。与最低月份相比,高峰月份的糖皮质激素增加了12倍和16倍,有些动物的糖皮质激素增加了100倍。相对于圈养组的最低点,一些自由生活组的糖皮质激素水平峰值增加了60倍,有些动物的糖皮质激素水平增加了800倍。这些动物大多比圈养动物的峰值高出1- 10倍。结论:带状猫鼬表现出季节性慢性糖皮质激素升高,主要与食物限制有关,其次与繁殖有关。这种升高的幅度和持续时间表明,这可能对某些动物来说是不适应的,可能会产生适应性后果。在旱季后期,这个种群可能面临压力源的趋同(食物限制、集中食物资源的拮抗遭遇、驱逐、发情、配偶竞争、分娩和幼崽的捕食压力),这可能导致体内平衡过载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ecology
BMC Ecology ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ecology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on environmental, behavioral and population ecology as well as biodiversity of plants, animals and microbes.
期刊最新文献
Hydrology influences breeding time in the white-throated dipper. Effects of habitat edges on vegetation structure and the vulnerable golden-brown mouse lemur (Microcebus ravelobensis) in northwestern Madagascar. Invasive raccoon management systems and challenges in regions with active control. Effects of tree species and topography on soil and microbial biomass stoichiometry in Funiu Mountain, China. Bioclimatic zonation and potential distribution of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Kivu Province, DR Congo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1