Significance of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies in normally grown fetuses.

Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology Pub Date : 2020-02-20 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40748-020-0115-7
Nebras Abu Al Hamayel, Haitham Baghlaf, Karin Blakemore, Jude P Crino, Irina Burd
{"title":"Significance of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies in normally grown fetuses.","authors":"Nebras Abu Al Hamayel,&nbsp;Haitham Baghlaf,&nbsp;Karin Blakemore,&nbsp;Jude P Crino,&nbsp;Irina Burd","doi":"10.1186/s40748-020-0115-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there is a relationship between abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies (UADS) and small for gestational age (SGA) birth weight and other adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses that appear normally grown by ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of all women who had UADS performed at or after 26 weeks of gestation at our institution between January 2005 and December 2012. Women were excluded if they had a fetal demise, a fetus with growth restriction, a fetus with congenital anomaly, or a multiple gestation. Women with missing delivery outcomes were excluded. The primary outcome was birth weight below the 10th percentile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2744 women included in the study. Of those, 98 (3.6%) had an abnormal UADS, and 379 (13.8%) had an SGA neonate. Of the 2646 women who had a normal UADS, 353 (13.3%) women had an SGA neonate. Twenty-six (26.5%) of the 98 women who had an abnormal UADS had an SGA neonate. After adjusting for potential confounders, the adjusted odds ratio for an SGA neonate with an abnormal UADS was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.38-3.58; <i>p</i> <  0.05). In examining other adverse perinatal outcomes, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and low 5-min Apgar scores were 12.4 and 2.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for NICU admission was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.06-3.21; <i>p</i> <  0.05). Abnormal UADS was not associated with low Apgar scores (aOR 1.39: 95% CI 0.47-4.07; <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that abnormal UADS in fetuses that appear normally grown by ultrasound are associated with SGA neonates and NICU admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40748-020-0115-7","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-020-0115-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there is a relationship between abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies (UADS) and small for gestational age (SGA) birth weight and other adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses that appear normally grown by ultrasound.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of all women who had UADS performed at or after 26 weeks of gestation at our institution between January 2005 and December 2012. Women were excluded if they had a fetal demise, a fetus with growth restriction, a fetus with congenital anomaly, or a multiple gestation. Women with missing delivery outcomes were excluded. The primary outcome was birth weight below the 10th percentile.

Results: There were 2744 women included in the study. Of those, 98 (3.6%) had an abnormal UADS, and 379 (13.8%) had an SGA neonate. Of the 2646 women who had a normal UADS, 353 (13.3%) women had an SGA neonate. Twenty-six (26.5%) of the 98 women who had an abnormal UADS had an SGA neonate. After adjusting for potential confounders, the adjusted odds ratio for an SGA neonate with an abnormal UADS was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.38-3.58; p <  0.05). In examining other adverse perinatal outcomes, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and low 5-min Apgar scores were 12.4 and 2.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for NICU admission was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.06-3.21; p <  0.05). Abnormal UADS was not associated with low Apgar scores (aOR 1.39: 95% CI 0.47-4.07; p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that abnormal UADS in fetuses that appear normally grown by ultrasound are associated with SGA neonates and NICU admission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常胎儿脐动脉异常多普勒检查的意义。
目的:探讨超声显示正常生长的胎儿脐动脉多普勒异常(UADS)与小胎龄(SGA)出生体重及其他不良围产期结局之间的关系。方法:回顾性研究2005年1月至2012年12月期间在我院进行妊娠26周或之后进行UADS的所有妇女。如果有胎儿死亡、胎儿生长受限、胎儿先天性异常或多胎妊娠,妇女被排除在外。未完成分娩的妇女被排除在外。主要结局是出生体重低于第10百分位。结果:共有2744名女性纳入研究。其中98例(3.6%)有异常的UADS, 379例(13.8%)有SGA新生儿。在2646名UADS正常的女性中,353名(13.3%)女性有SGA新生儿。98例UADS异常妇女中有26例(26.5%)有SGA新生儿。在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,SGA新生儿伴有异常UADS的校正优势比为2.2 (95% CI, 1.38-3.58;p p p > 0.05)。结论:我们的数据表明,超声显示正常生长的胎儿的异常UADS与SGA新生儿和NICU入院有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The fundamentals of a parental peer-to-peer support program in the NICU: a scoping review. Impact of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and perinatal outcomes during the Delta variant period: a comparison of the Delta and pre-delta time periods, 2020-2021. Preterm birth, low birth weight, and their co-occurrence among women with preexisting chronic diseases prior to conception: a cross-sectional analysis of postpartum women in a low-resource setting in Ghana. The effect of mode of delivery on postpartum comfort level and breastfeeding self-efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal hypothyroidism and the risk of preeclampsia: a Danish national and regional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1