Pilot study of a basic individualized cognitive behavioral therapy program for chronic pain in Japan.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BioPsychoSocial Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13030-020-00176-w
Hiroki Hosogoshi, Kazunori Iwasa, Takaki Fukumori, Yuriko Takagishi, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Tomonori Adachi, Yuki Oe, Yukino Tairako, Yumiko Takao, Hiroyuki Nishie, Ayako Kanie, Masaki Kitahara, Kiyoka Enomoto, Hirono Ishii, Issei Shinmei, Masaru Horikoshi, Masahiko Shibata
{"title":"Pilot study of a basic individualized cognitive behavioral therapy program for chronic pain in Japan.","authors":"Hiroki Hosogoshi,&nbsp;Kazunori Iwasa,&nbsp;Takaki Fukumori,&nbsp;Yuriko Takagishi,&nbsp;Yoshitake Takebayashi,&nbsp;Tomonori Adachi,&nbsp;Yuki Oe,&nbsp;Yukino Tairako,&nbsp;Yumiko Takao,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Nishie,&nbsp;Ayako Kanie,&nbsp;Masaki Kitahara,&nbsp;Kiyoka Enomoto,&nbsp;Hirono Ishii,&nbsp;Issei Shinmei,&nbsp;Masaru Horikoshi,&nbsp;Masahiko Shibata","doi":"10.1186/s13030-020-00176-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is a major health problem, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is its recommended treatment; however, efforts to develop CBT programs for chronic pain and assess their feasibility are remarkably delayed in Asia. Therefore, we conducted this pilot study to develop a basic individualized CBT for chronic pain (CBT-CP) and assessed its feasibility for use in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study was an open-labeled before-after trial without a control group conducted cooperatively in five Japanese tertiary care hospitals. Of 24 outpatients, 15, age 20-80, who experienced chronic pain for at least three months were eligible. They underwent an eight-session CBT-CP consisting of relaxation via a breathing method and progressive muscle relaxation, behavioral modification via activity pacing, and cognitive modification via cognitive reconstruction. The EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire five level (EQ5D-5 L) assessment as the primary outcome and quality of life (QOL), pain severity, disability, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms as secondary outcomes were measured using self-administered questionnaires at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect size for EQ5D-5 L score was medium from baseline to post-treatment (Hedge's <i>g</i> = - 0.72, 90% confidence interval = - 1.38 to - 0.05) and up to the 3-month follow-up (<i>g</i> = - 0.60, CI = - 1.22 to 0.02). Effect sizes for mental and role/social QOL, disability, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms were medium to large, although those for pain severity and physical QOL were small. The dropout rate was acceptably low at 14%. No severe adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that CBT-CP warrants a randomized controlled trial in Japan.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), UMIN000020880. Registered on 04 February 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13030-020-00176-w","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-020-00176-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is a major health problem, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is its recommended treatment; however, efforts to develop CBT programs for chronic pain and assess their feasibility are remarkably delayed in Asia. Therefore, we conducted this pilot study to develop a basic individualized CBT for chronic pain (CBT-CP) and assessed its feasibility for use in Japan.

Methods: Our study was an open-labeled before-after trial without a control group conducted cooperatively in five Japanese tertiary care hospitals. Of 24 outpatients, 15, age 20-80, who experienced chronic pain for at least three months were eligible. They underwent an eight-session CBT-CP consisting of relaxation via a breathing method and progressive muscle relaxation, behavioral modification via activity pacing, and cognitive modification via cognitive reconstruction. The EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire five level (EQ5D-5 L) assessment as the primary outcome and quality of life (QOL), pain severity, disability, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms as secondary outcomes were measured using self-administered questionnaires at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.

Results: Effect size for EQ5D-5 L score was medium from baseline to post-treatment (Hedge's g = - 0.72, 90% confidence interval = - 1.38 to - 0.05) and up to the 3-month follow-up (g = - 0.60, CI = - 1.22 to 0.02). Effect sizes for mental and role/social QOL, disability, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms were medium to large, although those for pain severity and physical QOL were small. The dropout rate was acceptably low at 14%. No severe adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that CBT-CP warrants a randomized controlled trial in Japan.

Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), UMIN000020880. Registered on 04 February 2016.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本慢性疼痛基本个体化认知行为治疗方案的试点研究。
背景:慢性疼痛是主要的健康问题,认知行为疗法(CBT)是其推荐的治疗方法;然而,在亚洲,开发治疗慢性疼痛的CBT项目和评估其可行性的努力明显滞后。因此,我们进行了这项试点研究,以开发一种基本的个体化慢性疼痛CBT (CBT- cp),并评估其在日本使用的可行性。方法:本研究采用开放标记的前后对照试验,无对照组,在日本五家三级医院合作进行。24名门诊患者中,15名年龄在20-80岁之间,经历了至少三个月的慢性疼痛。他们接受了8期的CBT-CP,包括通过呼吸法和渐进式肌肉放松法进行放松,通过活动步调进行行为改变,以及通过认知重建进行认知改变。EuroQol五维问卷五水平(eq5d - 5l)评估作为主要结果,生活质量(QOL)、疼痛严重程度、残疾、灾难化、自我效能和抑郁症状作为次要结果,采用基线、治疗后和3个月随访时的自我管理问卷进行测量。进行意向治疗分析。结果:eq5d - 5l评分的效应大小从基线到治疗后为中等(Hedge's g = - 0.72, 90%置信区间= - 1.38至- 0.05),直到3个月的随访(g = - 0.60, CI = - 1.22至0.02)。心理和角色/社会生活质量、残疾、灾难化、自我效能和抑郁症状的效应量为中等到较大,尽管疼痛严重程度和身体生活质量的效应量较小。辍学率低得可以接受,只有14%。未发生严重不良事件。结论:研究结果表明CBT-CP值得在日本进行随机对照试验。试验注册:大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册(UMIN-CTR), UMIN000020880。注册于2016年2月4日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
期刊最新文献
Association between maternal overprotection and premenstrual disorder: a machine learning based exploratory study. Development of computer adaptive tests to assess the psychological status of individuals with an eating disorder or type 2 diabetes. The impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on attention: an empirical investigation. Association of high complement and low immunoglobulins with the clinical symptoms of patients with fibromyalgia. Association of preconception premenstrual disorders with perinatal depression: an analysis of the perinatal clinical database of a single Japanese institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1