Safety and Efficacy of Oral Melatonin When Combined with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients with Bilateral Multiple Fracture Ribs.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2020-04-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S244510
Ahmed M Fetouh Abdelrahman, Amany Faheem Abdel Salam Omara, Alaa Ali M Elzohry
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Oral Melatonin When Combined with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients with Bilateral Multiple Fracture Ribs.","authors":"Ahmed M Fetouh Abdelrahman, Amany Faheem Abdel Salam Omara, Alaa Ali M Elzohry","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S244510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral melatonin administered with thoracic epidural analgesia in patients with multiple bilateral fractured ribs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective, double-blind randomized control study was carried out on 80 patients of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II, aged above 18 years, presenting with multiple bilateral fractured ribs. They were randomly divided into two groups, 40 patients each. Placebo group patients received oral placebo tablets and melatonin group (TEA and melatonin) patients received oral melatonin tablets (5 mg), about 1 hour before epidural infusion of local anesthetics and then every 12 hours till the cessation of bupivacaine infusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Melatonin administration was associated with a significant decrease in total morphine analgesia consumption, from 31.8 ± 1.41 mg in the TE group to 13.03 ± 0.85 mg in the melatonin group (P < 0.001), with a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the mean infusion rate of bupivacaine required for controlling the pain, from 0.17 ± 0.014 mL/kg/hour in the TE group to 0.12 ± 0.001 mL/kg/hour in the melatonin group. The duration of bupivacaine infusion in the melatonin group was also significantly shorter than in the TE group (96.48 ± 1.87 and 100.05 ± 3.39 hours, resp., P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that premedication of patients with 5 mg melatonin is associated with significant prolongation of thoracic epidural analgesic effects compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This clinical study was registered at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry with no. \"PACTR 201711002741378\" on 02-11-2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"13 ","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/5a/lra-13-21.PMC7166071.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S244510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral melatonin administered with thoracic epidural analgesia in patients with multiple bilateral fractured ribs.

Patients and methods: A prospective, double-blind randomized control study was carried out on 80 patients of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II, aged above 18 years, presenting with multiple bilateral fractured ribs. They were randomly divided into two groups, 40 patients each. Placebo group patients received oral placebo tablets and melatonin group (TEA and melatonin) patients received oral melatonin tablets (5 mg), about 1 hour before epidural infusion of local anesthetics and then every 12 hours till the cessation of bupivacaine infusion.

Results: Melatonin administration was associated with a significant decrease in total morphine analgesia consumption, from 31.8 ± 1.41 mg in the TE group to 13.03 ± 0.85 mg in the melatonin group (P < 0.001), with a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the mean infusion rate of bupivacaine required for controlling the pain, from 0.17 ± 0.014 mL/kg/hour in the TE group to 0.12 ± 0.001 mL/kg/hour in the melatonin group. The duration of bupivacaine infusion in the melatonin group was also significantly shorter than in the TE group (96.48 ± 1.87 and 100.05 ± 3.39 hours, resp., P < 0.001).

Conclusion: We conclude that premedication of patients with 5 mg melatonin is associated with significant prolongation of thoracic epidural analgesic effects compared to placebo.

Registration: This clinical study was registered at Pan African Clinical Trial Registry with no. "PACTR 201711002741378" on 02-11-2017.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服褪黑素与胸硬膜外镇痛联合应用于双侧多发性肋骨骨折患者的安全性和有效性
研究背景本研究的目的是评估口服褪黑素并配合胸硬膜外镇痛对双侧多发性肋骨骨折患者的安全性和有效性:这项前瞻性双盲随机对照研究的对象是80名年龄在18岁以上、双侧多根肋骨骨折的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级男女患者。他们被随机分为两组,每组 40 人。安慰剂组患者口服安慰剂片剂,褪黑素组(三乙醇胺和褪黑素)患者在硬膜外注射局麻药前约 1 小时口服褪黑素片剂(5 毫克),然后每 12 小时注射一次,直至停止注射布比卡因:使用褪黑素后,吗啡镇痛剂的总消耗量显著减少,从 TE 组的 31.8 ± 1.41 毫克减少到褪黑素组的 13.03 ± 0.85 毫克(P 结论:褪黑素能显著减少吗啡镇痛剂的总消耗量:我们得出结论:与安慰剂相比,给患者使用5毫克褪黑素预处理可显著延长胸硬膜外镇痛效果:本临床研究已在泛非临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 "PACTR 2017110027"。"PACTR 201711002741378"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Modified-Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondral Approach in a Patient Undergoing Bilateral Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Report. Foot Drop Following a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block with Ropivacaine, A Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study. Current Status and Global Trend of Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Use of Local Anaesthetics Among Non-Anaesthesia Healthcare Professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1