Local and Regional Anesthesia最新文献

Background: Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through the perichondrial approach (M TAPA), described by Tulgar et al in 2019, is a relatively new block. The block is relatively superficial and easy to perform. It has been successfully used in various laparoscopic surgeries and has been shown to reduce the perioperative opioid requirements.

Case presentation: We report the case of a 41-year-old male with ASA grade 2, who was scheduled to undergo laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair. The patient had General Anaesthesia with bilateral M TAPA using 30 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side before the incision. Intraoperatively, the surgeon decided that the patient would require bilateral inguinal hernia repair. The patient received 100 µg fentanyl at induction, and intravenous paracetamol and ketorolac intraoperatively. The surgery was uneventful, and the patient was transferred to a post anaesthesia care unit. In the postoperative period, the patient did not require opioids and received only two doses each of paracetamol and ketorolac. The patient was discharged the following day, without any further sequelae.

Conclusion: When administered bilaterally, MTAPA can provide adequate analgesia and has opioid-sparing effects in both the intra and postoperative periods.

Although peripheral nerve blocks are deemed very safe, a significant number of patients for whom this anesthetic technique may be particularly appealing to apply may present with preexisting peripheral neuropathies, putting them at risk for further nerve damage. We present a case with a 74-year-old male with several risk factors for peripheral neuropathy who developed a foot drop following a popliteal sciatic nerve block with ropivacaine. We suggest that the vasoconstrictive properties of ropivacaine may have contributed to a preexisting neuronal ischemia, thus further damaging an already compromised nerve.

Objective: Acute postoperative pain is one of the major clinical problems that occurs in patients undergoing cesarean section with a prevalence of 89.8%. Postoperative pain causes discomfort and various complications for the mother. In addition, postoperative pain that is not handled properly can increase the risk of becoming chronic pain by 2.5 times. One of the methods recommended in the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) protocol to prevent acute postoperative pain is the use of intrathecal long-acting opioids, with intrathecal morphine as the gold standard and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. This study aims to assess the comparison of opioid needs as analgesic rescue between the administration of 0.1mg spinal morphine and TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 10mg in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods: This study is an observational study in a single Tertiary Hospital in West Java - Indonesia. Patients were given patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) with fentanyl as analgesic rescue. Statistical analysis of the numerical data used the unpaired t-test and Chi-Square test for categorical data.

Results: In the group that was given spinal morphine, the duration of additional opioids was longer (p < 0.05), and the total dose of additional opioids was less than the TAP block group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The spinal morphine requires fewer additional opioids than the TAP block.

Purpose: Rebound pain after regional anesthesia, a common phenomenon when the analgesic effect wears off, has been recognized in the last a few years. The aim of this study is to analyze the status and tendency of this area in a macroscopic perspective.

Methods: Bibliometric analysis is the primary methodology of this study. Literature retrieval was conducted in Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection. WoS, Excel, VOSviewer and CiteSpace were employed to do the analyses and visualization. Parameters were analyzed, such as publications, citations, journals, and keywords, etc.

Results: In total, 70 articles in the past 10 years were identified eligible. Most articles (14 pieces) were published in 2021, followed by 2022 and 2023 with 13 articles. Researchers come from 134 institutions and 20 countries. Huang Jung-Taek, Hallym College, and USA are the most productive author, institution and country, respectively. The articles were mainly published on the top journals of anesthesiology, orthopedics and surgery. The topic of these articles is primarily about the clinical issues of rebound pain. Peripheral nerve block, brachial plexus block and femoral nerve block are the activist keywords in the area, while perioperative management, fracture surgery and outcome may become hotpots in the next years.

Conclusion: Our results show that the study of rebound pain after regional anesthesia starts relatively late and is in upward tendency, future studies can focus on the perioperative management and outcomes of fracture patients, and the definition and mechanism of rebound pain after regional anesthesia.

Introduction: Local anaesthetics (LA) are commonly used in dental and surgical emergency wards by both anaesthesia professionals and non-anaesthesia professionals. Anecdotal evidence shows that non-anaesthesia health-care professionals do not monitor vital signs during the use of local anaesthesia, and there are no standard hospital guidelines on the use of LA and management of LA toxicity by non-anaesthesia professionals.

Purpose: This study sought to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding local anaesthetic use among non-anaesthesia health-care professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.

Patients and methods: This was a cross-sectional study that utilized a quantitative research approach. The sample size of the study was 43 non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals from the casualty and surgical outpatient wards and Mulago dental ward. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using STATA 15.

Results: Overall, 66.67% of the Specialist, 76.47% of the senior house officers, 100% of medical officers, and 80% of the clinical orthopedic house officers had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge in Mulago casualty and surgical outpatient wards. 20% of the specialist and 16.67% of the senior house officers had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge in Mulago dental ward. 87.5% of the non-anaesthesia health-care professionals do not give a test dose on a routine basis in Mulago casualty and surgical outpatient wards. A total of 63.64% of the non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals in Mulago dental ward do not sterilize the site of injection.

Conclusion: Non-anaesthesia health-care professionals had unsatisfactory levels of knowledge, somewhat good practices, and negative attitudes toward LA use.

Purpose: The management of unstable patients with weapon-wounded lower limb vascular injuries presents significant anesthetic challenges. Regional anesthesia blocks, which combine lumbar and sacral plexus blocks, or their respective branches, minimize systemic effects and are deemed appropriate for high-risk patients requiring lower limb surgery. This case series aims to share our preliminary experiences with a combined anesthetic technique-sciatic nerve (SN), posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN), and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) blocks -in patients sustaining weapon wounds and undergoing lower limb vascular injury repair in austere environments.

Patients and methods: Seven patients with lower limb vascular injuries resulting from weapons who required surgery at district hospitals supported by the International Committee of the Red Cross were included in this study. Included patients underwent surgery for vascular repair and debridement using a combined nerve block technique involving the SN, PFCN, and SIFI blocks between May and December 2023. The blocks were administered using a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine.

Results: The combined block technique for the Sciatic Nerve (SN), Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (PFCN), and the Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca (SIFI) were performed without complications in all patients. Three of the patients received light sedation prior to the initiation of the block procedure. All surgeries were completed successfully without the need for additional analgesics or conversion to general anesthesia.

Conclusion: The combined block technique for the Sciatic Nerve (SN), Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (PFCN), and the Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca (SIFI) appears to be a safe anesthetic option for unstable or high-risk patients requiring lower limb surgery. Further research with a larger cohort is necessary to validate our findings and to potentially standardize this approach.

Background: Patients diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) are at high risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications. While it is important to focus on optimizing their cardiac function, it is also crucial to address and optimize any other modifiable risk factors that could potentially impact postoperative outcome. This also includes careful consideration of anesthetic techniques to suit the patient and facilitate the surgery. However, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding the safety of specific anesthetic approaches for heart failure patients.

Case presentation: We describe the case of an adult patient in mid-50s, with a history of ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced Ejection Fraction (about 25%) who presented with acute gangrenous appendicitis and was scheduled for an open appendectomy. It was deemed to be a high-risk patient for general and spinal anesthesia. With the guidance of a multidisciplinary team, surgery was successfully performed using a quadratus lumborum block with standard monitoring. The patient was comfortable and hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Conclusion: Quadratus Lumborum Block for open appendectomy can be a beneficial alternative anesthesia technique in high-risk patients that significantly lowers perioperative cardiovascular risk, maintains hemodynamics, enhances satisfaction, and shortens hospital stay.

Objective: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is a condition resulting from upper cervical spine dysfunction and associated structural and soft tissue abnormalities, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. To acquire better therapeutic results, we presented a novel ultrasound-guided "three in one" approach plus interfascial plane (IFP) blocks for the treatment of CEH. This approach allows for the modulation of C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG), third occipital nerve (TON), and C3 medial branch with one-point puncture. Additionally, it allows for IFP blocks between the upper neck and occipital muscles within the same scanning plane.

Patients and methods: We evaluated patients diagnosed with CEH from July 2021 to December 2022 in our pain clinic. We included those who did not respond to conservative treatment and single occipital nerve block, therefore received nerve block or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) using the "Three in One" approach plus IFP blocks. The accuracy of the ultrasound-guided C2 DRG puncture procedures was confirmed through fluoroscopy with C-arm and the sensory testing of PRF. The therapeutic effect of these interventions was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores during telephone follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months.

Results: Utilizing the "Three in One" approach, a total of 5 patients diagnosed with CEH underwent nerve block plus IFP blocks, while 2 patients underwent PRF plus IFP blocks. Employing ultrasound-guided C2 DRG puncture procedures, the needle tip's correct placement was confirmed through both fluoroscopy and sensory testing of PRF. Notably, none of the cases experienced any complications associated with the approach. Subsequent follow-up assessments revealed an improvement in the NRS scores for CEH in all patients.

Conclusion: The ultrasound-guided "Three in One" approach plus IFP blocks may be a potential effective method for the treatment of CEH.

Background: The aims of this study are to analyze the association between the number of recorded pain scores and baseline pain following surgery, analgesia technique, and patient demographics, as well as the substitution of missing data with the results from mean substitution, last observation carried forward, regression imputation, multiple imputation, and mixed models.

Methods: This retrospective chart review was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The following data were collected: patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), race, and ethnicity); surgery type and date; analgesia with or without transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block; as well as the time, date, and value for all postoperative pain scores on the first postoperative day (POD). The following null hypotheses were tested: (1) the number of pain recordings will be independent of TAP block analgesia, baseline pain on POD 1, and patient demographics; and (2) there will be no significant differences in pain scores with and without TAP block analgesia following complete case analysis, mean substitution, last observation carried forward, regression imputation, multiple imputation, and mixed models.

Results: This study analyzed 486 patients including 2562 recorded pain scores. An increase in age by one year is, on average, associated with a 0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.060 to -0.025) decrease in the number of pain scores recorded (p < 0.001). Black race is associated with 0.763 less pain scores, on average (95% CI -1.49 to -0.039) and this value is statistically significant (p = 0.039). All datasets with substituted values for missing data yield lower pain scores for patients who did not receive TAP block. Significant differences in recorded pain scores are only noted for scores recorded between 0400 and 0759 and 1600-1959 in mixed models.

Conclusion: Discrepancies in pain score recordings among patients are associated with age and black race. When these discrepancies are addressed with statistical methods, clinically significant differences are appreciated.