Reduction of Distress Intolerance With Salutotherapeutic Interventions: Results From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Q1 Psychology Chronic Stress Pub Date : 2018-09-27 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2470547018800484
Josephine Otto, Michael Linden
{"title":"Reduction of Distress Intolerance With Salutotherapeutic Interventions: Results From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Josephine Otto,&nbsp;Michael Linden","doi":"10.1177/2470547018800484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distress tolerance is the ability to pursue one's goals in the presence of (chronic) stressors, hardship, adversities and negative internal states, and psychological distress. By contrast, distress intolerance is a transdiagnostic indicator of mental illness and a mediator in coping with problems in life, work demands, or stress in general. There is a lack of data regarding intervention strategies. The objective of the present study is to test the differential effects of two treatment approaches: \"regeneration fostering\" versus \"resistance training.\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inpatients of a psychosomatic hospital were randomly allocated to either a resistance training group therapy (<i>n</i> = 65)-that is, active coping with demands and endurance-or a regeneration fostering group therapy (<i>n</i> = 62)-that is, recovery, mindful indulgence, and creative activities. They were compared with a group of patients who received treatment as usual (<i>n</i> = 43), without special treatments for distress intolerance, and the outcome was measured with the \"Distress Intolerance Scale.\" One-way and repeated measure analyses of variance and paired <i>t</i> tests were used for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"regeneration\" group showed a significant improvement in distress intolerance, whereas there was no significant change for the treatment-as-usual group and in the \"resistance\" group. Post hoc tests were conducted with paired sample <i>t</i> tests for pre-post comparisons for each group. No differences were found for the treatment-as-usual group (<i>mean difference</i>: 0.03, <i>SD</i> (mean difference): 0.89; <i>t</i>(42) = 0.266, <i>p</i> = 0.792, <i>d</i> = 0.04) and for the resistance group (<i>mean difference</i>:-0.07, <i>SD</i> (mean difference): 0.73; <i>t</i>(63) = -0.736, <i>p</i> = 0.464, <i>d</i> = 0.08). The regeneration group showed a significant decline in distress intolerance (<i>mean difference</i>: 0.29, <i>SD</i> (mean difference): 0.72; <i>t</i>(61) = 3.156, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>d</i> = 0.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the treatment of distress intolerance, it seems promising to focus on positive psychology interventions and resources. Limitations of the study are that it was conducted with psychosomatic inpatients only and that no follow-up data are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":52315,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Stress","volume":" ","pages":"2470547018800484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2470547018800484","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2470547018800484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Distress tolerance is the ability to pursue one's goals in the presence of (chronic) stressors, hardship, adversities and negative internal states, and psychological distress. By contrast, distress intolerance is a transdiagnostic indicator of mental illness and a mediator in coping with problems in life, work demands, or stress in general. There is a lack of data regarding intervention strategies. The objective of the present study is to test the differential effects of two treatment approaches: "regeneration fostering" versus "resistance training."

Methods: Inpatients of a psychosomatic hospital were randomly allocated to either a resistance training group therapy (n = 65)-that is, active coping with demands and endurance-or a regeneration fostering group therapy (n = 62)-that is, recovery, mindful indulgence, and creative activities. They were compared with a group of patients who received treatment as usual (n = 43), without special treatments for distress intolerance, and the outcome was measured with the "Distress Intolerance Scale." One-way and repeated measure analyses of variance and paired t tests were used for the analysis.

Results: The "regeneration" group showed a significant improvement in distress intolerance, whereas there was no significant change for the treatment-as-usual group and in the "resistance" group. Post hoc tests were conducted with paired sample t tests for pre-post comparisons for each group. No differences were found for the treatment-as-usual group (mean difference: 0.03, SD (mean difference): 0.89; t(42) = 0.266, p = 0.792, d = 0.04) and for the resistance group (mean difference:-0.07, SD (mean difference): 0.73; t(63) = -0.736, p = 0.464, d = 0.08). The regeneration group showed a significant decline in distress intolerance (mean difference: 0.29, SD (mean difference): 0.72; t(61) = 3.156, p = 0.002, d = 0.38).

Conclusions: In the treatment of distress intolerance, it seems promising to focus on positive psychology interventions and resources. Limitations of the study are that it was conducted with psychosomatic inpatients only and that no follow-up data are available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过健康治疗干预减少痛苦不耐受:一项随机对照临床试验的结果。
背景:承受痛苦是指在(慢性)压力源、困难、逆境和消极的内在状态以及心理痛苦的情况下追求目标的能力。相比之下,痛苦不耐受是精神疾病的跨诊断指标,也是应对生活、工作要求或一般压力问题的中介。缺乏有关干预策略的数据。本研究的目的是测试两种治疗方法的不同效果:“再生培养”与“阻力训练”。方法:某心身医院的住院患者被随机分配到抗阻训练组(n = 65),即积极应对需求和耐力,或再生培养组(n = 62),即康复,正念放纵和创造性活动。他们与一组接受常规治疗的患者(n = 43)进行比较,没有对痛苦不耐受进行特殊治疗,结果用“痛苦不耐受量表”进行测量。分析采用单因素和重复测量方差分析及配对t检验。结果:“再生”组在痛苦耐受方面有明显改善,而“常规治疗”组和“抵抗”组无明显变化。事后检验采用配对样本t检验对每组进行前后比较。常规治疗组无差异(平均差异0.03,SD(平均差异):0.89;t(42) = 0.266, p = 0.792, d = 0.04),耐药组(平均差值:-0.07,SD(平均差值):0.73;T (63) = -0.736, p = 0.464, d = 0.08)。再生组痛苦耐受能力显著下降(平均差0.29,SD(平均差):0.72;T (61) = 3.156, p = 0.002, d = 0.38)。结论:在痛苦不耐受的治疗中,关注积极心理学干预和资源似乎是有希望的。该研究的局限性在于仅对心身住院患者进行了研究,并且没有随访数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Stress
Chronic Stress Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Criticality is Associated with Future Psychotherapy Response in Patients with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-A Pilot Study. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Reduces Unhelpful Thinking Among People with Musculoskeletal Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis. A Loss Cycle of Burnout Symptoms and Reduced Coping Self-Efficacy: A Latent Change Score Modelling Approach. The Role of Genetic Variations in the FAAH rs324420 Polymorphism and its Interaction with CRHR1 rs110402 and CNR1 rs2180619 in Anxiety and- Trauma Related Symptoms After Military Deployment. Interpersonal Violence and Mental Health, Drug use, and Treatment Utilization among Patients with Co-Occurring Opioid use and Mental Health Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1