Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2020-05-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.41082
Jianglong Han, Zhihua Nie, Ping Li, Hongwei Shi, Shijie Wang, Qin Li, Rui Zhang, Yunfeng Qiao, Kejie Huang, Zhenming Fu
{"title":"Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.","authors":"Jianglong Han,&nbsp;Zhihua Nie,&nbsp;Ping Li,&nbsp;Hongwei Shi,&nbsp;Shijie Wang,&nbsp;Qin Li,&nbsp;Rui Zhang,&nbsp;Yunfeng Qiao,&nbsp;Kejie Huang,&nbsp;Zhenming Fu","doi":"10.7150/jca.41082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: A consensus regarding optimum treatment strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has not yet been reached. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment modalities for LAGC and provided clinicians salvage options under real-world situation. <b>Methods</b>: Medical charts of patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy from July 2003 to December 2014 were included. Validation cohort were selected from SEER database between 2004 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazardous models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential baseline confounding. <b>Results</b>: A total of 350 patients were included and divided into D1 dissection plus chemotherapy group (D1CT, n = 74), D1 dissection plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (D1CRT, n = 69), D2 dissection plus adjuvant chemotherapy group (D2CT, n = 134), and D2 dissection plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (D2CRT, n = 73). PSM identified 50 patients in each group. After PSM, better DFS (<i>P</i> for D2CRT vs. D1CT, D1CRT, and D2CT was 0.001, 0.006, and 0.001, respectively) and OS (<i>P</i> for D2CRT vs. D1CT, D1CRT, and D2CT was 0.001, 0.011, and 0.022, respectively) were found for the D2CRT group (mean, OS = 110.7months, DFS = 95.2 months) than the other groups. Similar findings were further validated in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) cohort. In addition, patients in the D1CRT group achieved similar survival outcomes to those in the D2CT group (mean OS, 72.8 vs. 59.1 months, <i>P</i> = 0.86; mean DFS, 54.4 vs. 34.1 months, <i>P</i> = 0.460). <b>Conclusions</b>: The results of the study indicated the better role for D2CRT in treating the LAGC, meanwhile, the patients treated with D1CRT might achieve similar survival as that of D2CT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"11 15","pages":"4421-4430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7150/jca.41082","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.41082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: A consensus regarding optimum treatment strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has not yet been reached. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment modalities for LAGC and provided clinicians salvage options under real-world situation. Methods: Medical charts of patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy from July 2003 to December 2014 were included. Validation cohort were selected from SEER database between 2004 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazardous models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential baseline confounding. Results: A total of 350 patients were included and divided into D1 dissection plus chemotherapy group (D1CT, n = 74), D1 dissection plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (D1CRT, n = 69), D2 dissection plus adjuvant chemotherapy group (D2CT, n = 134), and D2 dissection plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (D2CRT, n = 73). PSM identified 50 patients in each group. After PSM, better DFS (P for D2CRT vs. D1CT, D1CRT, and D2CT was 0.001, 0.006, and 0.001, respectively) and OS (P for D2CRT vs. D1CT, D1CRT, and D2CT was 0.001, 0.011, and 0.022, respectively) were found for the D2CRT group (mean, OS = 110.7months, DFS = 95.2 months) than the other groups. Similar findings were further validated in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) cohort. In addition, patients in the D1CRT group achieved similar survival outcomes to those in the D2CT group (mean OS, 72.8 vs. 59.1 months, P = 0.86; mean DFS, 54.4 vs. 34.1 months, P = 0.460). Conclusions: The results of the study indicated the better role for D2CRT in treating the LAGC, meanwhile, the patients treated with D1CRT might achieve similar survival as that of D2CT patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期胃癌治疗方式的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)的最佳治疗策略尚未达成共识。我们旨在评估各种治疗方式对LAGC的疗效,并在现实情况下为临床医生提供挽救方案。方法:收集2003年7月至2014年12月行根治加辅助化疗或放化疗的LAGC患者病历。验证队列选择自SEER数据库2004 - 2014年。Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险模型用于评估总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和无病生存期(DFS)。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于调整潜在的基线混淆。结果:共纳入350例患者,分为D1剥离+化疗组(D1CT, n = 74)、D1剥离+辅助放化疗组(D1CRT, n = 69)、D2剥离+辅助化疗组(D2CT, n = 134)、D2剥离+辅助放化疗组(D2CRT, n = 73)。PSM确定每组50例患者。PSM后,D2CRT组的DFS (D2CRT与D1CT、D1CRT、D2CT的P值分别为0.001、0.006、0.001)和OS (D2CRT与D1CT、D1CRT、D2CT的P值分别为0.001、0.011、0.022)均优于其他各组(平均OS = 110.7个月,DFS = 95.2个月)。类似的发现在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(SEER)队列中得到进一步验证。此外,D1CRT组患者的生存结果与D2CT组相似(平均OS, 72.8 vs. 59.1个月,P = 0.86;平均DFS, 54.4 vs. 34.1个月,P = 0.460)。结论:本研究结果表明,D2CRT治疗LAGC的作用更好,同时,D1CRT治疗患者的生存期可能与D2CT治疗患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Disulfiram/Copper Combination as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Targeting the ATF3-Mitochondrial Cell Death Pathway. The Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers in PIPAC: Predicting Survival and Treatment Completion in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis. Multi-Omics and Single-Cell Dissection of Exostosin Glycosyltransferases (EXT1/EXT2) Reveals Divergent Oncogenic Roles and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Gliomas. Sulforaphane-cysteine elicits apoptosis through JNK-mediated caspase activation in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Identification of key ferroptosis-related targets in colorectal cancer: A transcriptomics-driven study via machine learning and AUcell analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1