Predicting 30-day mortality and 30-day re-hospitalization risks in Medicare patients with heart failure discharged to skilled nursing facilities: development and validation of models using administrative data.

Lin Li, Jonggyu Baek, Bill M Jesdale, Anne L Hume, Giovanni Gambassi, Robert J Goldberg, Kate L Lapane
{"title":"Predicting 30-day mortality and 30-day re-hospitalization risks in Medicare patients with heart failure discharged to skilled nursing facilities: development and validation of models using administrative data.","authors":"Lin Li,&nbsp;Jonggyu Baek,&nbsp;Bill M Jesdale,&nbsp;Anne L Hume,&nbsp;Giovanni Gambassi,&nbsp;Robert J Goldberg,&nbsp;Kate L Lapane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the growing importance of skilled nursing facility care for Medicare patients hospitalized with heart failure, no risk prediction models for these patients exist.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate separate predictive models for 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day all-cause re-hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Medicare claims data cross-linked with Minimum Data Set 3.0.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>11,529 skilled nursing facilities in the United States (2011-2013).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>77,670 hospitalized heart failure patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (randomly split into development (2/3) and validation (1/3) cohorts).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Using data on patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health service use, functional status, and facility-level factors, we developed separate prediction models for 30-day mortality and 30-day re-hospitalization using logistic regression models in the development cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 30 days, 6.8% died and 24.2% were re-hospitalized. Thirteen patient-level factors remained in the final model for 30-day mortality and 10 patient-level factors for re-hospitalization with good calibration. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 for 30-day mortality and 0.63 for re-hospitalization in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Medicare patients with heart failure discharged to skilled nursing facilities, predicting 30-day mortality and re-hospitalization using administrative data is challenging. Further work identifying factors for re-hospitalization remains needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75093,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing home research sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280783/pdf/nihms-1589373.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing home research sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing importance of skilled nursing facility care for Medicare patients hospitalized with heart failure, no risk prediction models for these patients exist.

Objectives: To develop and validate separate predictive models for 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day all-cause re-hospitalization.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Medicare claims data cross-linked with Minimum Data Set 3.0.

Setting: 11,529 skilled nursing facilities in the United States (2011-2013).

Participants: 77,670 hospitalized heart failure patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (randomly split into development (2/3) and validation (1/3) cohorts).

Measurements: Using data on patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health service use, functional status, and facility-level factors, we developed separate prediction models for 30-day mortality and 30-day re-hospitalization using logistic regression models in the development cohort.

Results: Within 30 days, 6.8% died and 24.2% were re-hospitalized. Thirteen patient-level factors remained in the final model for 30-day mortality and 10 patient-level factors for re-hospitalization with good calibration. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 for 30-day mortality and 0.63 for re-hospitalization in the validation cohort.

Conclusions: Among Medicare patients with heart failure discharged to skilled nursing facilities, predicting 30-day mortality and re-hospitalization using administrative data is challenging. Further work identifying factors for re-hospitalization remains needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测医疗保险心衰患者30天死亡率和30天再住院风险:利用行政数据开发和验证模型
背景:尽管熟练的护理机构护理对住院的医疗保险患者心衰的重要性日益增加,但目前还没有针对这些患者的风险预测模型。目的:建立和验证30天全因死亡率和30天全因再住院的单独预测模型。设计:回顾性队列研究,使用与最小数据集3.0交联的全国医疗保险索赔数据。背景:2011-2013年,美国共有11529家专业护理机构。参与者:77,670名住院心力衰竭患者出院到熟练的护理机构(随机分为发展(2/3)和验证(1/3)队列)。测量方法:利用患者社会人口学和临床特征、卫生服务使用、功能状态和设施水平因素的数据,我们在发展队列中使用logistic回归模型建立了30天死亡率和30天再住院的单独预测模型。结果:30 d内死亡6.8%,再住院24.2%。校正良好的最终30天死亡率模型中保留了13个患者水平因素,10个再次住院患者水平因素。在验证队列中,30天死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.71,再住院的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.63。结论:在医疗保险心衰患者出院到熟练的护理机构,预测30天死亡率和再住院使用行政数据是具有挑战性的。仍然需要进一步确定再次住院的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antihyperglycemic Drug Use in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Diabetes Mellitus. LETTER TO THE EDITOR: VITAMIN D INTAKE AND FALLS AMONG OLDER NURSING HOME RESIDENTS Editorial: Research in nursing homes in the time of COVID Comorbidity and dependence jointly indicate the need for palliative care in nursing home residents Physicians' perceived barriers and proposed solutions for high-quality palliative care in dementia in the Netherlands: Qualitative analysis of survey data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1