Antihyperglycemic Drug Use in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Diabetes Mellitus.

The journal of nursing home research sciences Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-12
Anne L Hume, Seun Osundolire, Attah K Mbrah, Anthony P Nunes, Kate L Lapane
{"title":"Antihyperglycemic Drug Use in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Anne L Hume,&nbsp;Seun Osundolire,&nbsp;Attah K Mbrah,&nbsp;Anthony P Nunes,&nbsp;Kate L Lapane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 29.2% of American adults ≥ 65 years of age have diabetes mellitus, but details regarding diabetes management especially among nursing home residents are dated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the prevalence of antihyperglycemic agents in residents with diabetes mellitus and describe resident characteristics using major drug classes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>virtually all United States nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>141,636 residents with diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Minimum Data Set (2016) and Medicare Part D claims determined use of metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinide analogs, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, TZDs, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP1 agonists, as monotherapy and with basal insulin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two percent received antihyperglycemic drugs [most common: basal insulins (53.9% total; 46.9% with other non-insulin agents), metformin (35.5% total; 14.2% monotherapy), sulfonylureas (19.6% total; 6.3% monotherapy), and DPP4 inhibitors (12.2% total; 2.2% monotherapy)]. Sixty-three percent of meglitinide monotherapy versus 34.1% of metformin monotherapy users; and 38.3% meglitinide-basal insulin versus 22.2% metformin-basal insulin users were ≥85 years. Obesity was greater among users of GLP1 agonists compared to those receiving other agents (monotherapy: 60.5% versus 33-42%; with basal insulin: 76.2% versus 50-58%). End-stage renal disease was least prevalent among metformin users (monotherapy: 6.6%; with basal insulin: 8.8%) and most common among meglitinide monotherapy (19.6%) and GLP1 agonists with basal insulin (22%) users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is heterogeneity of diabetes treatment in nursing homes. Use of antihyperglycemic drugs with a higher risk of hypoglycemia, such as insulin with sulfonylureas or meglitinides, continue in nursing home residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":75093,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing home research sciences","volume":"8 ","pages":"10-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9706405/pdf/nihms-1852404.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing home research sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About 29.2% of American adults ≥ 65 years of age have diabetes mellitus, but details regarding diabetes management especially among nursing home residents are dated.

Objectives: Evaluate the prevalence of antihyperglycemic agents in residents with diabetes mellitus and describe resident characteristics using major drug classes.

Design: cross-sectional study.

Setting: virtually all United States nursing homes.

Participants: 141,636 residents with diabetes mellitus.

Measurements: Minimum Data Set (2016) and Medicare Part D claims determined use of metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinide analogs, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, TZDs, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP1 agonists, as monotherapy and with basal insulin.

Results: Seventy-two percent received antihyperglycemic drugs [most common: basal insulins (53.9% total; 46.9% with other non-insulin agents), metformin (35.5% total; 14.2% monotherapy), sulfonylureas (19.6% total; 6.3% monotherapy), and DPP4 inhibitors (12.2% total; 2.2% monotherapy)]. Sixty-three percent of meglitinide monotherapy versus 34.1% of metformin monotherapy users; and 38.3% meglitinide-basal insulin versus 22.2% metformin-basal insulin users were ≥85 years. Obesity was greater among users of GLP1 agonists compared to those receiving other agents (monotherapy: 60.5% versus 33-42%; with basal insulin: 76.2% versus 50-58%). End-stage renal disease was least prevalent among metformin users (monotherapy: 6.6%; with basal insulin: 8.8%) and most common among meglitinide monotherapy (19.6%) and GLP1 agonists with basal insulin (22%) users.

Conclusions: There is heterogeneity of diabetes treatment in nursing homes. Use of antihyperglycemic drugs with a higher risk of hypoglycemia, such as insulin with sulfonylureas or meglitinides, continue in nursing home residents.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期护理之家糖尿病患者之抗高血糖药物使用。
背景:大约29.2%的≥65岁的美国成年人患有糖尿病,但关于糖尿病管理的细节,特别是在养老院的居民是过时的。目的:评估糖尿病患者使用降糖药的情况,描述主要药物类别的特点。设计:横断面研究。环境:几乎所有的美国养老院。研究对象:141636名糖尿病患者。测量:最小数据集(2016)和医疗保险D部分声明确定了二甲双胍、磺脲类药物、美格列酮类似物、α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、tzd、DPP4抑制剂、SGLT2抑制剂、GLP1激动剂作为单药和基础胰岛素的使用。结果:72%的患者接受过降糖药物治疗[最常见的是基础胰岛素(53.9%);46.9%使用其他非胰岛素药物),二甲双胍(合计35.5%;14.2%单一疗法),磺脲类(19.6%总;6.3%单药治疗)和DPP4抑制剂(12.2%;2.2%的单一疗法)]。63%的美格列尼单药治疗者对34.1%的二甲双胍单药治疗者;使用美格列尼-基础胰岛素者为38.3%,使用二甲双胍-基础胰岛素者为22.2%,年龄≥85岁。与接受其他药物治疗的患者相比,GLP1激动剂使用者的肥胖程度更高(单药治疗:60.5%对33-42%;基础胰岛素组:76.2% vs 50-58%)。终末期肾病在二甲双胍使用者中发病率最低(单药治疗:6.6%;在美格列尼单药治疗(19.6%)和GLP1激动剂治疗基础胰岛素(22%)使用者中最常见。结论:养老院糖尿病治疗存在异质性。养老院居民继续使用低血糖风险较高的降糖药,如胰岛素和磺脲类药物或美格列酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antihyperglycemic Drug Use in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents with Diabetes Mellitus. LETTER TO THE EDITOR: VITAMIN D INTAKE AND FALLS AMONG OLDER NURSING HOME RESIDENTS Editorial: Research in nursing homes in the time of COVID Comorbidity and dependence jointly indicate the need for palliative care in nursing home residents Physicians' perceived barriers and proposed solutions for high-quality palliative care in dementia in the Netherlands: Qualitative analysis of survey data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1