Flow Cytometric Quantification of Granulocytic Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Unlysed Whole Blood.

Q1 Health Professions Current Protocols in Cytometry Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1002/cpcy.76
Jorge Bardina, Laura G Rico, Michael D Ward, Jolene A Bradford, Jordi Juncà, Jordi Petriz
{"title":"Flow Cytometric Quantification of Granulocytic Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Unlysed Whole Blood.","authors":"Jorge Bardina,&nbsp;Laura G Rico,&nbsp;Michael D Ward,&nbsp;Jolene A Bradford,&nbsp;Jordi Juncà,&nbsp;Jordi Petriz","doi":"10.1002/cpcy.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Translational research has improved the diagnosis and follow-up of hematological diseases and malignancies. However, some classical diagnostics used for research and clinical practice that have remain practically unchanged for decades may be better addressed through advances in flow cytometry technology, whereby more precise measurements may be implemented in a straightforward manner. The current method for semiquantitative analysis of granulocytic alkaline phosphatase (GAP) activity is still based on observer-dependent color-intensity classification. Here, we describe a novel strategy for flow cytometric quantification of GAP activity in which staining and analytical flow cytometry facilitate the detection and quantification of subpopulations of leukocytes with different GAP activities. Our experiments demonstrate the potential of flow cytometry as a simple and highly sensitive approach for measuring GAP activity in unlysed whole blood. Notably, a comparison of flow cytometry and enzyme cytochemistry techniques showed that enzyme activity scores were not similar, indicating that results needs to be interpreted with caution, given that the enzyme-substrate binding affinities may differ, as well as the subjective evaluation of the intensity of the precipitated dye. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Protocol preparation, sample acquisition, and gating strategy for flow cytometric identification of alkaline phosphatase activity in granulocytes from whole blood samples Support Protocol 1: Sample preparation for granulocyte alkaline phosphatase determination by flow cytometry using no-lyse no-wash methods Support Protocol 2: Data analysis and formula to calculate the GAP score.</p>","PeriodicalId":11020,"journal":{"name":"Current Protocols in Cytometry","volume":"93 1","pages":"e76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpcy.76","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Protocols in Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpcy.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Translational research has improved the diagnosis and follow-up of hematological diseases and malignancies. However, some classical diagnostics used for research and clinical practice that have remain practically unchanged for decades may be better addressed through advances in flow cytometry technology, whereby more precise measurements may be implemented in a straightforward manner. The current method for semiquantitative analysis of granulocytic alkaline phosphatase (GAP) activity is still based on observer-dependent color-intensity classification. Here, we describe a novel strategy for flow cytometric quantification of GAP activity in which staining and analytical flow cytometry facilitate the detection and quantification of subpopulations of leukocytes with different GAP activities. Our experiments demonstrate the potential of flow cytometry as a simple and highly sensitive approach for measuring GAP activity in unlysed whole blood. Notably, a comparison of flow cytometry and enzyme cytochemistry techniques showed that enzyme activity scores were not similar, indicating that results needs to be interpreted with caution, given that the enzyme-substrate binding affinities may differ, as well as the subjective evaluation of the intensity of the precipitated dye. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Protocol preparation, sample acquisition, and gating strategy for flow cytometric identification of alkaline phosphatase activity in granulocytes from whole blood samples Support Protocol 1: Sample preparation for granulocyte alkaline phosphatase determination by flow cytometry using no-lyse no-wash methods Support Protocol 2: Data analysis and formula to calculate the GAP score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流式细胞术定量测定未溶全血粒细胞碱性磷酸酶活性。
转化研究改善了血液病和恶性肿瘤的诊断和随访。然而,一些用于研究和临床实践的经典诊断方法几十年来几乎没有改变,可以通过流式细胞术技术的进步来更好地解决,流式细胞术技术可以以一种直接的方式实现更精确的测量。目前对粒细胞碱性磷酸酶(GAP)活性的半定量分析方法仍然是基于观察者依赖的颜色强度分类。在这里,我们描述了一种新的流式细胞术定量GAP活性的策略,其中染色和分析流式细胞术有助于检测和定量具有不同GAP活性的白细胞亚群。我们的实验证明了流式细胞术作为一种简单而高灵敏度的方法测量未裂解全血中GAP活性的潜力。值得注意的是,流式细胞术和酶细胞化学技术的比较显示,酶活性评分并不相似,这表明,考虑到酶与底物的结合亲和力可能不同,以及对沉淀染料强度的主观评价,需要谨慎解释结果。©2020 Wiley期刊有限责任公司基本方案:全血样本中粒细胞碱性磷酸酶活性的流式细胞术鉴定方案制备、样品采集和门控策略支持方案1:使用no-lyse - no-wash方法流式细胞术测定粒细胞碱性磷酸酶的样品制备支持方案2:数据分析和计算GAP评分的公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Protocols in Cytometry
Current Protocols in Cytometry Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published in affiliation with the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry, Current Protocols in Cytometry is a "best practices" collection that distills and organizes the absolute latest techniques from the top cytometry labs and specialists worldwide. It is the most complete set of peer-reviewed protocols for flow and image cytometry available.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Detection and Sorting of Extracellular Vesicles and Viruses Using nanoFACS Live Imaging of the Lung Small Particle Fluorescence and Light Scatter Calibration Using FCMPASS Software. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1