Sanitation for Low-Income Regions: A Cross-Disciplinary Review.

IF 15.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Annual Review of Environment and Resources Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-07-23 DOI:10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033327
Christopher Hyun, Zachary Burt, Yoshika Crider, Kara L Nelson, C S Sharada Prasad, Swati D G Rayasam, William Tarpeh, Isha Ray
{"title":"Sanitation for Low-Income Regions: A Cross-Disciplinary Review.","authors":"Christopher Hyun,&nbsp;Zachary Burt,&nbsp;Yoshika Crider,&nbsp;Kara L Nelson,&nbsp;C S Sharada Prasad,&nbsp;Swati D G Rayasam,&nbsp;William Tarpeh,&nbsp;Isha Ray","doi":"10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sanitation research focuses primarily on containing human waste and preventing disease; thus, it has traditionally been dominated by the fields of environmental engineering and public health. Over the past 20 years, however, the field has grown broader in scope and deeper in complexity, spanning diverse disciplinary perspectives. In this article, we review the current literature in the range of disciplines engaged with sanitation research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We find that perspectives on what sanitation is, and what sanitation policy should prioritize, vary widely. We show how these diverse perspectives augment the conventional sanitation service chain, a framework describing the flow of waste from capture to disposal. We review how these perspectives can inform progress toward equitable sanitation for all [i.e., Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6]. Our key message is that both material and nonmaterial flows-and both technological and social functions-make up a sanitation \"system.\" The components of the sanitation service chain are embedded within the flows of finance, decision making, and labor that make material flows of waste possible. The functions of capture, storage, transport, treatment, reuse, and disposal are interlinked with those of ensuring equity and affordability. We find that a multilayered understanding of sanitation, with contributions from multiple disciplines, is necessary to facilitate inclusive and robust research toward the goal of sanitation for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":7982,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","volume":"44 1","pages":"287-318"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033327","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Sanitation research focuses primarily on containing human waste and preventing disease; thus, it has traditionally been dominated by the fields of environmental engineering and public health. Over the past 20 years, however, the field has grown broader in scope and deeper in complexity, spanning diverse disciplinary perspectives. In this article, we review the current literature in the range of disciplines engaged with sanitation research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We find that perspectives on what sanitation is, and what sanitation policy should prioritize, vary widely. We show how these diverse perspectives augment the conventional sanitation service chain, a framework describing the flow of waste from capture to disposal. We review how these perspectives can inform progress toward equitable sanitation for all [i.e., Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6]. Our key message is that both material and nonmaterial flows-and both technological and social functions-make up a sanitation "system." The components of the sanitation service chain are embedded within the flows of finance, decision making, and labor that make material flows of waste possible. The functions of capture, storage, transport, treatment, reuse, and disposal are interlinked with those of ensuring equity and affordability. We find that a multilayered understanding of sanitation, with contributions from multiple disciplines, is necessary to facilitate inclusive and robust research toward the goal of sanitation for all.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入地区的卫生:跨学科审查。
卫生研究主要侧重于控制人类排泄物和预防疾病;因此,它传统上一直由环境工程和公共卫生领域主导。然而,在过去的20年里,该领域的范围越来越广,复杂性越来越深,涵盖了不同的学科视角。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了低收入和中等收入国家从事卫生研究的一系列学科的现有文献。我们发现,关于什么是环境卫生以及环境卫生政策应该优先考虑什么的观点差异很大。我们展示了这些不同的视角如何增强传统的卫生服务链,这是一个描述废物从捕获到处置流程的框架。我们回顾了这些观点如何为实现人人享有公平卫生的进展提供信息[即可持续发展目标6]。我们要传达的关键信息是,物质流和非物质流以及技术和社会功能构成了一个卫生“系统”。卫生服务链的组成部分嵌入了资金流、决策流和劳动力流中,使废物的物质流成为可能。捕获、储存、运输、处理、再利用和处置的功能与确保公平和可负担性的功能是相互关联的。我们发现,在多个学科的贡献下,有必要对卫生进行多层次的理解,以促进包容性和强有力的研究,实现人人享有卫生的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, established in 1976, offers authoritative reviews on key environmental science and engineering topics. It covers various subjects, including ecology, conservation science, water and energy resources, atmosphere, oceans, climate change, agriculture, living resources, and the human dimensions of resource use and global change. The journal's recent transition from gated to open access through Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program, with all articles published under a CC BY license, enhances the dissemination of knowledge in the field.
期刊最新文献
30×30 for Climate: The History and Future of Climate Change–Integrated Conservation Strategies The Commons Exploring Alternative Futures in the Anthropocene Pushing the Frontiers of Biodiversity Research: Unveiling the Global Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation of Fungi Three Decades of Climate Mitigation Policy: What Has It Delivered?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1