Comparative Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey Public-use and Restricted-use Linked Mortality Files.

Q2 Medicine National health statistics reports Pub Date : 2020-06-01
Lisa B Mirel, Suad El Bural Félix, Cindy Zhang, Cordell Golden, Christine S Cox
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey Public-use and Restricted-use Linked Mortality Files.","authors":"Lisa B Mirel,&nbsp;Suad El Bural Félix,&nbsp;Cindy Zhang,&nbsp;Cordell Golden,&nbsp;Christine S Cox","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linking national survey data with administrative data sources enables researchers to conduct analyses that would not be possible with each data source alone. Recently, the Data Linkage Program at the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released updated linked mortality files, including the National Health Interview Survey data linked to the National Death Index mortality files. Two versions of the files were released: restricted-use files available through NCHS and Federal Statistical Research Data Centers and public-use files. To reduce the reidentification risk, statistical disclosure limitation methods were applied to the public-use files before they were released. This included limiting the amount of mortality information available and perturbing cause of death and follow-up time for select records. To assess the comparability of the restricted-use and public-use files, relative hazard ratios for all-cause and cause-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models were estimated and compared. The comparative analysis found that the two data files yielded very similar descriptive and model results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 143","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National health statistics reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linking national survey data with administrative data sources enables researchers to conduct analyses that would not be possible with each data source alone. Recently, the Data Linkage Program at the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) released updated linked mortality files, including the National Health Interview Survey data linked to the National Death Index mortality files. Two versions of the files were released: restricted-use files available through NCHS and Federal Statistical Research Data Centers and public-use files. To reduce the reidentification risk, statistical disclosure limitation methods were applied to the public-use files before they were released. This included limiting the amount of mortality information available and perturbing cause of death and follow-up time for select records. To assess the comparability of the restricted-use and public-use files, relative hazard ratios for all-cause and cause-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models were estimated and compared. The comparative analysis found that the two data files yielded very similar descriptive and model results.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国健康访谈调查公共使用与限制使用相关死亡率档案的比较分析。
将国家调查数据与行政数据源联系起来,使研究人员能够进行单独使用每个数据源无法进行的分析。最近,国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)的数据链接项目发布了更新的相关死亡率文件,包括与国家死亡指数死亡率文件相关的国家健康访谈调查数据。这些文件有两个版本:通过国家人口统计中心和联邦统计研究数据中心提供的限制使用文件和公共使用文件。为降低再识别风险,对公用档案在发布前采用统计披露限制方法。这包括限制可获得的死亡率信息的数量,干扰死亡原因和选定记录的随访时间。为了评估限制使用和公共使用文件的可比性,使用Cox比例风险模型估计和比较了全因和病因特异性死亡率的相对风险比。对比分析发现,这两个数据文件产生了非常相似的描述和模型结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
National health statistics reports
National health statistics reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Notice: Effective January 2008 the title, National Health Statistics Reports (NHSR), replaces Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics (AD). NHSRs will be numbered sequentially beginning with 1. The last AD report number is 395. These reports provide annual data summaries, present analyses of health topics, or present new information on methods or measurement issues.
期刊最新文献
Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022. Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Office-based Physicians and Long-term Care Providers. Prescription Medication Use, Coverage, and Nonadherence Among Adults Age 65 and Older: United States, 2021-2022. Overview of Post-acute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020. Sociodemographic Differences in Nonfinancial Access Barriers to Health Care Among Adults: United States, 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1