首页 > 最新文献

National health statistics reports最新文献

英文 中文
Difficulties in Functioning Among Children in the United States: 2021-2023. 美国儿童功能障碍:2021-2023。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174615
Julie D Weeks, Jennifer H Madans, Lindsey I Black, Nazik Elgaddal, Benjamin Zablotsky

Objectives: This report presents national estimates of difficulties in functioning for children ages 2-17.

Methods: 2021-2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data were used to assess difficulties in functioning among children. NHIS has included the Child Functioning Module, developed jointly by UNICEF and the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, since 2019. The module's questions ask about difficulties in the following functional domains: seeing, hearing, walking, communication, behavior, and learning (for all children ages 2-17); fine motor and playing (for children ages 2-4); and self-care, remembering, concentrating, coping with change, relationships, and affect (anxiety and depression) (for children ages 5-17). Prevalence estimates were calculated for different levels of difficulty (a lot of difficulty, some difficulty, or no difficulty) and are presented for overall functioning, by individual functional domain, and by number of functional domains where difficulties were reported. Differences in functioning by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, urbanization level, and family income are also presented.

Results: In 2021-2023, about one-quarter (24.9%) of children ages 2-4 experienced difficulties in functioning (4.1% experienced a lot of difficulty in one or more domains and 20.8% experienced some difficulty). Among children ages 5-17, just over one-half (50.8%) experienced functioning difficulties (13.0% experienced a lot of difficulty and 37.8% experienced some difficulty). The prevalence of functioning difficulties varied by sex, with boys being more likely than girls to experience a lot of difficulty in at least one domain, but differences across other characteristics varied. Functioning difficulties were most prevalent in the domains of communication, learning, behavior, and playing among children ages 2-4. For those ages 5-17, the most prevalent domains were anxiety, accepting change, behavior, depression, and making friends. Among children who experienced functioning difficulties, most had difficulty in only one functional domain.

目的:本报告介绍了国家对2-17岁儿童功能障碍的估计。方法:采用2021-2023年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)数据评估儿童功能障碍。自2019年以来,NHIS纳入了由联合国儿童基金会和华盛顿残疾统计小组联合开发的儿童功能模块。该模块的问题涉及以下功能领域的困难:视觉,听觉,行走,沟通,行为和学习(适用于所有2-17岁的儿童);精细运动和游戏(适合2-4岁儿童);自我照顾、记忆力、注意力集中、应对变化、人际关系和情感(焦虑和抑郁)(适用于5-17岁的儿童)。患病率估计是根据不同的困难程度(很多困难、一些困难或没有困难)计算的,并根据整体功能、个人功能领域和报告困难的功能领域的数量来呈现。不同年龄、性别、种族和西班牙裔、城市化水平和家庭收入的功能差异也有所不同。结果:2021-2023年,约四分之一(24.9%)的2-4岁儿童经历过功能障碍,其中4.1%在一个或多个领域经历了很多困难,20.8%经历了一些困难。在5-17岁的儿童中,略多于一半(50.8%)经历了功能障碍(13.0%经历了很多困难,37.8%经历了一些困难)。功能障碍的普遍程度因性别而异,男孩比女孩更有可能在至少一个领域遇到很多困难,但其他特征的差异则有所不同。在2-4岁的儿童中,功能障碍在沟通、学习、行为和玩耍方面最为普遍。对于5-17岁的人来说,最普遍的领域是焦虑、接受变化、行为、抑郁和交朋友。在经历过功能障碍的儿童中,大多数人只在一个功能领域有困难。
{"title":"Difficulties in Functioning Among Children in the United States: 2021-2023.","authors":"Julie D Weeks, Jennifer H Madans, Lindsey I Black, Nazik Elgaddal, Benjamin Zablotsky","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174615","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This report presents national estimates of difficulties in functioning for children ages 2-17.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2021-2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data were used to assess difficulties in functioning among children. NHIS has included the Child Functioning Module, developed jointly by UNICEF and the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, since 2019. The module's questions ask about difficulties in the following functional domains: seeing, hearing, walking, communication, behavior, and learning (for all children ages 2-17); fine motor and playing (for children ages 2-4); and self-care, remembering, concentrating, coping with change, relationships, and affect (anxiety and depression) (for children ages 5-17). Prevalence estimates were calculated for different levels of difficulty (a lot of difficulty, some difficulty, or no difficulty) and are presented for overall functioning, by individual functional domain, and by number of functional domains where difficulties were reported. Differences in functioning by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, urbanization level, and family income are also presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021-2023, about one-quarter (24.9%) of children ages 2-4 experienced difficulties in functioning (4.1% experienced a lot of difficulty in one or more domains and 20.8% experienced some difficulty). Among children ages 5-17, just over one-half (50.8%) experienced functioning difficulties (13.0% experienced a lot of difficulty and 37.8% experienced some difficulty). The prevalence of functioning difficulties varied by sex, with boys being more likely than girls to experience a lot of difficulty in at least one domain, but differences across other characteristics varied. Functioning difficulties were most prevalent in the domains of communication, learning, behavior, and playing among children ages 2-4. For those ages 5-17, the most prevalent domains were anxiety, accepting change, behavior, depression, and making friends. Among children who experienced functioning difficulties, most had difficulty in only one functional domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 218","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145604979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personal Care Aides in Adult Day Services Centers and Residential Care Communities: United States, 2022. 成人日间服务中心和住宿护理社区的个人护理助理:美国,2022。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174600
Manisha Sengupta, Christine Caffrey, Jessica P Lendon, Priyanka Singh

Introduction: Personal care aides (aides) are a key part of the long-term care infrastructure and provide hands-on care and support with essential activities of daily living to older and disabled Americans. This report presents the number of aides employed in adult day services centers (ADSC) and residential care communities (RCC), the hours they spend with their service users, and their training and benefits.

Methods: Data are from the ADSC and RCC provider components of the 2022 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study includes several questions on staffing, including about the number of registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs) or licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), and aides employed directly by ADSCs and RCCs. Full-time equivalent (FTE) staff is based on the number of full-time and part-time employees. A measure of hours per user (participant or resident) per day was used to compare staffing levels in the two settings relative to the number of users. Responses to questions on number of hours of training required and types of training and benefits offered to aides were used to compare in and across ADSC and RCC settings.

Results: Of the 15,600 nursing (RN, LPN or LVN, and aide) FTEs employed in ADSCs and 452,000 employed in RCCs, the majority were aides (63.2% and 76.0%, respectively). Both settings often employed at least one aide (56.2% and 75.6%). The average total of all nursing staffing hours per participant or resident per day was 1 hour and 34 minutes for ADSCs and 4 hours and 25 minutes for RCCs. A lower percentage of ADSCs than RCCs offered training in dementia care (50.8% and 72.3%) and end-of-life issues (19.7% and 58.4%).

个人护理助手(助手)是长期护理基础设施的重要组成部分,为美国老年人和残疾人提供日常生活基本活动的实际护理和支持。本报告介绍了在成人日间服务中心(ADSC)和寄宿护理社区(RCC)雇用的助理人数,他们与服务用户相处的时间,以及他们的培训和福利。方法:数据来自国家卫生统计中心每两年进行一次的2022年国家急性后和长期护理研究的ADSC和RCC提供者组成部分。该研究包括几个关于人员配置的问题,包括注册护士(RNs)、执业护士(lpn)或执业护士(LVNs)的数量,以及adsc和rcc直接雇用的助手的数量。全职等值员工(FTE)是根据全职和兼职员工的人数计算的。使用每个用户(参与者或居民)每天的小时数来比较两种设置中相对于用户数量的人员配备水平。对所需培训时数、培训类型和向助手提供的福利等问题的回答用于比较ADSC和RCC设置内和之间的差异。结果:在ADSCs和rcc分别有15600名护士(注册护士、LPN、LVN和助手)和452000名护士中,以助手为主(分别为63.2%和76.0%)。两种设置通常至少有一名助手(56.2%和75.6%)。每位参与者或住院患者每天的护理人员平均总时数为ADSCs为1小时34分钟,rcc为4小时25分钟。与rcc相比,提供痴呆护理培训(50.8%和72.3%)和临终问题培训(19.7%和58.4%)的ADSCs比例较低。
{"title":"Personal Care Aides in Adult Day Services Centers and Residential Care Communities: United States, 2022.","authors":"Manisha Sengupta, Christine Caffrey, Jessica P Lendon, Priyanka Singh","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174600","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Personal care aides (aides) are a key part of the long-term care infrastructure and provide hands-on care and support with essential activities of daily living to older and disabled Americans. This report presents the number of aides employed in adult day services centers (ADSC) and residential care communities (RCC), the hours they spend with their service users, and their training and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the ADSC and RCC provider components of the 2022 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study includes several questions on staffing, including about the number of registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs) or licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), and aides employed directly by ADSCs and RCCs. Full-time equivalent (FTE) staff is based on the number of full-time and part-time employees. A measure of hours per user (participant or resident) per day was used to compare staffing levels in the two settings relative to the number of users. Responses to questions on number of hours of training required and types of training and benefits offered to aides were used to compare in and across ADSC and RCC settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15,600 nursing (RN, LPN or LVN, and aide) FTEs employed in ADSCs and 452,000 employed in RCCs, the majority were aides (63.2% and 76.0%, respectively). Both settings often employed at least one aide (56.2% and 75.6%). The average total of all nursing staffing hours per participant or resident per day was 1 hour and 34 minutes for ADSCs and 4 hours and 25 minutes for RCCs. A lower percentage of ADSCs than RCCs offered training in dementia care (50.8% and 72.3%) and end-of-life issues (19.7% and 58.4%).</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 217","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455667/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145054641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enrollment in High-deductible Health Plans Among People Younger Than Age 65 With Private Health Insurance: United States, 2019-2023. 65岁以下有私人医疗保险的人参加高免赔额健康计划:美国,2019-2023。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/165797
Robin A Cohen, Elizabeth M Briones

Objective: This report provides a comprehensive look at enrollment in high-deductible health plans (HDHP), including consumer-directed health plans (CDHP) among privately insured people younger than age 65.

Methods: Data from the 2019 through 2023 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine enrollment in HDHPs and CDHPs among people younger than age 65 with private health insurance. CDHPs are HDHPs with an associated health savings account or health reimbursement account. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, family educational attainment, level of urbanization, and source of private coverage.

Results: In 2023, among privately insured people younger than age 65, 41.7% were enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment increased from 40.3% in 2019 to 43.3% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.7% in 2023. Among people with employment-based coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 40.2% in 2019 to 43.4% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.9% in 2023. For people with directly purchased coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 44.3% in 2019 to 47.0% in 2020, followed by a decrease to 43.1% in 2023. Generally, White non-Hispanic people were the most likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people were the least likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment in an HDHP increased with family income and family educational attainment. In 2023, 19.5% of people younger than age 65 with private health insurance were enrolled in a CDHP. Enrollment characteristics of people with CDHPs mirrored those of people with HDHPs overall. However, children were more likely to be enrolled in an CDHP plan than adults ages 18-64. People with employment-based coverage were nearly four times more likely to be enrolled in a CDHP than their counterparts with directly purchased coverage.

目的:本报告提供了一个全面的看登记高免赔额健康计划(HDHP),包括消费者导向的健康计划(CDHP)在私人保险年龄小于65岁的人。方法:使用2019年至2023年全国健康访谈调查的数据,检查65岁以下有私人健康保险的人参加hdhp和cdhp的情况。cdhp是具有相关健康储蓄账户或健康报销账户的hdhp。所有估算均按性别、年龄组、种族和西班牙裔、家庭收入、家庭受教育程度、城市化水平和私人保险来源分列。结果:2023年,在65岁以下的私人保险人群中,41.7%的人参加了HDHP。入学率从2019年的40.3%上升到2021年的43.3%,随后在2023年下降到41.7%。在以就业为基础的保险人群中,HDHP的入学率从2019年的40.2%上升到2021年的43.4%,随后下降到2023年的41.9%。对于直接购买保险的人来说,HDHP的入学率从2019年的44.3%上升到2020年的47.0%,然后在2023年下降到43.1%。一般来说,非西班牙裔白人最有可能参加HDHP。非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人参加HDHP的可能性最小。参加HDHP的人数随着家庭收入和教育程度的增加而增加。2023年,65岁以下拥有私人医疗保险的人中有19.5%参加了CDHP。cdhp患者的入组特征反映了hdhp患者的总体特征。然而,儿童比18-64岁的成年人更有可能参加CDHP计划。拥有以就业为基础的保险的人参加CDHP的可能性几乎是直接购买保险的人的四倍。
{"title":"Enrollment in High-deductible Health Plans Among People Younger Than Age 65 With Private Health Insurance: United States, 2019-2023.","authors":"Robin A Cohen, Elizabeth M Briones","doi":"10.15620/cdc/165797","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/165797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report provides a comprehensive look at enrollment in high-deductible health plans (HDHP), including consumer-directed health plans (CDHP) among privately insured people younger than age 65.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2019 through 2023 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine enrollment in HDHPs and CDHPs among people younger than age 65 with private health insurance. CDHPs are HDHPs with an associated health savings account or health reimbursement account. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, family educational attainment, level of urbanization, and source of private coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023, among privately insured people younger than age 65, 41.7% were enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment increased from 40.3% in 2019 to 43.3% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.7% in 2023. Among people with employment-based coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 40.2% in 2019 to 43.4% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.9% in 2023. For people with directly purchased coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 44.3% in 2019 to 47.0% in 2020, followed by a decrease to 43.1% in 2023. Generally, White non-Hispanic people were the most likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people were the least likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment in an HDHP increased with family income and family educational attainment. In 2023, 19.5% of people younger than age 65 with private health insurance were enrolled in a CDHP. Enrollment characteristics of people with CDHPs mirrored those of people with HDHPs overall. However, children were more likely to be enrolled in an CDHP plan than adults ages 18-64. People with employment-based coverage were nearly four times more likely to be enrolled in a CDHP than their counterparts with directly purchased coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 214","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831409/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of Older Adults Who Met Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: United States, 2022. 符合美国联邦体育活动指南的老年人的特征:美国,2022。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/166708
Nazik Elgaddal, Ellen A Kramarow

Objective: This report presents national estimates of the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.

Methods: Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2018 Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time. Adults were considered to have met the guidelines if they met both aerobic and muscle-strengthening recommendations. Estimates are presented by age group, sex, race and Hispanic origin, education, family income, urbanization level, respondent-assessed health status, chronic conditions, disability status, severity of depression symptoms, severity of anxiety symptoms, and body mass index.

Results: Overall, 13.9% (age adjusted) of adults age 65 and older met federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities in 2022. Differences were seen by several sociodemographic characteristics. Men (16.9%), White non-Hispanic adults (15.2%), and those living in metropolitan areas (14.7%) were more likely to meet the guidelines. The percentage meeting the federal physical activity guidelines increased with increasing education level and family income and decreased with number of chronic conditions. Older adults who reported poor health status had the lowest percentage meeting the guidelines compared with those reporting good, very good, or excellent health. Older adults without disabilities were three times more likely to meet the federal physical activity guidelines than adults with disabilities (15.9% compared with 5.0%, respectively). Older adults with no depression or anxiety symptoms were more likely to meet the guidelines than those with mild symptoms or moderate or severe symptoms.

目的:本报告根据社会人口学和健康相关特征,对符合联邦体育活动指南的65岁及以上成年人在闲暇时间进行有氧和肌肉强化活动的百分比进行了全国估计。方法:使用2022年全国健康访谈调查的数据来估计符合美国卫生与公众服务部2018年美国人联邦体育活动指南的65岁及以上成年人在闲暇时间进行有氧和肌肉强化活动的百分比。如果成年人同时符合有氧运动和肌肉强化建议,则被认为符合指南。根据年龄组、性别、种族和西班牙裔、教育程度、家庭收入、城市化水平、受访者评估的健康状况、慢性病、残疾状况、抑郁症状的严重程度、焦虑症状的严重程度和体重指数提出了估计数。结果:总体而言,在2022年,13.9%(年龄调整后)65岁及以上的成年人在有氧和肌肉强化活动方面符合联邦体育活动指南。从几个社会人口统计学特征可以看出差异。男性(16.9%)、非西班牙裔白人成年人(15.2%)和居住在大都市地区的人(14.7%)更有可能符合指南。符合联邦体育活动指南的百分比随着教育水平和家庭收入的增加而增加,随着慢性病的增加而减少。报告健康状况不佳的老年人与报告健康状况良好、非常好或非常好的老年人相比,符合指南的比例最低。无残疾的老年人达到联邦体育活动指南的可能性是残疾成年人的三倍(分别为15.9%和5.0%)。没有抑郁或焦虑症状的老年人比那些有轻度症状或中度或重度症状的老年人更有可能符合指南。
{"title":"Characteristics of Older Adults Who Met Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: United States, 2022.","authors":"Nazik Elgaddal, Ellen A Kramarow","doi":"10.15620/cdc/166708","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/166708","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report presents national estimates of the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2018 Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time. Adults were considered to have met the guidelines if they met both aerobic and muscle-strengthening recommendations. Estimates are presented by age group, sex, race and Hispanic origin, education, family income, urbanization level, respondent-assessed health status, chronic conditions, disability status, severity of depression symptoms, severity of anxiety symptoms, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 13.9% (age adjusted) of adults age 65 and older met federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities in 2022. Differences were seen by several sociodemographic characteristics. Men (16.9%), White non-Hispanic adults (15.2%), and those living in metropolitan areas (14.7%) were more likely to meet the guidelines. The percentage meeting the federal physical activity guidelines increased with increasing education level and family income and decreased with number of chronic conditions. Older adults who reported poor health status had the lowest percentage meeting the guidelines compared with those reporting good, very good, or excellent health. Older adults without disabilities were three times more likely to meet the federal physical activity guidelines than adults with disabilities (15.9% compared with 5.0%, respectively). Older adults with no depression or anxiety symptoms were more likely to meet the guidelines than those with mild symptoms or moderate or severe symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 215","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022. 成人焦虑和抑郁症状:美国,2019 年和 2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/64018
Emily P Terlizzi, Benjamin Zablotsky

Objective: This report examines the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, and how those may have changed between 2019 and 2022.

Methods: Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and symptoms of depression, using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).

Results: During 2022, about one in five adults age 18 and older experienced any symptoms of anxiety (18.2%) or symptoms of depression (21.4%) in the past 2 weeks. The severity of symptoms differed by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics. The percentages of adults with mild, moderate, or severe symptoms of both anxiety and depression were highest among adults ages 18-29 and decreased with age and were higher among women than men. Asian non-Hispanic adults were least likely to experience moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety and depression compared with the other race and Hispanic-origin groups examined. In addition, the percentage of adults with any symptoms of anxiety and depression was highest among those with less than a high school education and with family incomes less than 100% of the federal poverty level and was higher among those living in rural areas. A significant increase was seen in the percentage of adults with anxiety symptoms (from 15.6% to 18.2%, respectively) and depression symptoms (from 18.5% to 21.4%, respectively) between 2019 and 2022. Increases in symptoms of anxiety and depression were seen throughout the subgroups examined, including adults ages 18-44, Black non-Hispanic and White non-Hispanic adults, adults with a high school education or more, and adults with family incomes of 100% of the federal poverty level or higher, as well as adults from all regions and urbanization levels.

目的:本报告研究了按社会人口和地理特征划分的成年人焦虑和抑郁症状的流行率,以及这些特征在 2019 年至 2022 年期间可能发生的变化:本报告研究了按社会人口和地理特征划分的成年人焦虑症和抑郁症状的流行情况,以及这些症状在 2019 年至 2022 年期间可能发生的变化:方法:利用 2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,使用广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)研究焦虑症状的流行率,并使用患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-8)研究抑郁症状的流行率:2022 年期间,约五分之一的 18 岁及以上成年人在过去两周内出现过任何焦虑症状(18.2%)或抑郁症状(21.4%)。症状的严重程度因社会人口和地理特征而异。有轻度、中度或重度焦虑和抑郁症状的成年人比例在 18-29 岁的成年人中最高,随着年龄的增长而下降,女性高于男性。与其他种族和西班牙裔群体相比,非西班牙裔亚裔成年人出现中度和重度焦虑和抑郁症状的可能性最小。此外,在高中以下学历、家庭收入低于联邦贫困线 100%的成年人中,出现任何焦虑和抑郁症状的比例最高,而在农村地区的成年人中,这一比例也更高。在 2019 年至 2022 年期间,出现焦虑症状(分别从 15.6% 上升至 18.2%)和抑郁症状(分别从 18.5% 上升至 21.4%)的成年人比例大幅上升。焦虑和抑郁症状的增加出现在所研究的所有亚组中,包括 18-44 岁的成年人、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人成年人、具有高中或高中以上学历的成年人、家庭收入达到联邦贫困线 100%或更高水平的成年人,以及来自所有地区和城市化水平的成年人。
{"title":"Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022.","authors":"Emily P Terlizzi, Benjamin Zablotsky","doi":"10.15620/cdc/64018","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/64018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report examines the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, and how those may have changed between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and symptoms of depression, using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, about one in five adults age 18 and older experienced any symptoms of anxiety (18.2%) or symptoms of depression (21.4%) in the past 2 weeks. The severity of symptoms differed by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics. The percentages of adults with mild, moderate, or severe symptoms of both anxiety and depression were highest among adults ages 18-29 and decreased with age and were higher among women than men. Asian non-Hispanic adults were least likely to experience moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety and depression compared with the other race and Hispanic-origin groups examined. In addition, the percentage of adults with any symptoms of anxiety and depression was highest among those with less than a high school education and with family incomes less than 100% of the federal poverty level and was higher among those living in rural areas. A significant increase was seen in the percentage of adults with anxiety symptoms (from 15.6% to 18.2%, respectively) and depression symptoms (from 18.5% to 21.4%, respectively) between 2019 and 2022. Increases in symptoms of anxiety and depression were seen throughout the subgroups examined, including adults ages 18-44, Black non-Hispanic and White non-Hispanic adults, adults with a high school education or more, and adults with family incomes of 100% of the federal poverty level or higher, as well as adults from all regions and urbanization levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 213","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616099/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142730554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022. 按选定特征分列的成年人到保健中心就诊的情况:美国,2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.15620/CDC/59282
Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman

Objective: This report describes care received at health centers in the United States in 2022. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics.

Methods: The data presented in this report are from the 2022 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers and federally qualified health center look-alikes and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Results: During 2022, an estimated 89.5 million visits were made by adults to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 349.4 visits per 1,000 adults. The visit rate among women was higher than for men. Differences in visit rates by age were not significant. Adults who were not married accounted for 48.2% of visits, and adults who were married accounted for 37.6% of visits. More than one-half of health center visits were disease-related (61.4%). Symptoms-related diagnoses accounted for 22.0% of visits. Screenings (12.6%) and examinations (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Social determinants of health were listed as a reason for the visit at 2.0% of health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category (29.1%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. Mental disorders represented the most common disease category among adults ages 18-44.

Conclusions: Women visited health centers at a higher rate than men. In addition, patient and visit characteristics, including marital status and diagnoses, differed by age.

目的:本报告介绍了 2022 年美国医疗中心提供的医疗服务。方法:本报告中的数据来自 2022 年全国非住院医疗护理调查健康中心部分。数据收集自联邦合格医疗中心和联邦合格医疗中心类似机构,并经过加权处理,得出具有全国代表性的美国 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区医疗中心就诊人次估计数:2022 年期间,美国成年人到保健中心就诊的人次估计为 8950 万,每 1000 名成年人中就诊的总人次为 349.4。女性的就诊率高于男性。不同年龄段的就诊率差异不大。未婚成年人占就诊人数的 48.2%,已婚成年人占就诊人数的 37.6%。超过一半的健康中心就诊是与疾病相关的(61.4%)。与症状相关的诊断占就诊人数的 22.0%。筛查(12.6%)和检查(10.2%)也是保健中心就诊的常见原因。有 2.0% 的健康中心就诊者将健康的社会决定因素列为就诊原因。内分泌疾病是最常被提及的疾病类别(29.1%),无论是在总体上还是在 45 岁及以上的成年人中。精神障碍是 18-44 岁成年人中最常见的疾病类别:结论:女性到保健中心就诊的比例高于男性。此外,患者和就诊者的特征,包括婚姻状况和诊断,因年龄而异。
{"title":"Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022.","authors":"Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman","doi":"10.15620/CDC/59282","DOIUrl":"10.15620/CDC/59282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report describes care received at health centers in the United States in 2022. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data presented in this report are from the 2022 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers and federally qualified health center look-alikes and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, an estimated 89.5 million visits were made by adults to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 349.4 visits per 1,000 adults. The visit rate among women was higher than for men. Differences in visit rates by age were not significant. Adults who were not married accounted for 48.2% of visits, and adults who were married accounted for 37.6% of visits. More than one-half of health center visits were disease-related (61.4%). Symptoms-related diagnoses accounted for 22.0% of visits. Screenings (12.6%) and examinations (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Social determinants of health were listed as a reason for the visit at 2.0% of health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category (29.1%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. Mental disorders represented the most common disease category among adults ages 18-44.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women visited health centers at a higher rate than men. In addition, patient and visit characteristics, including marital status and diagnoses, differed by age.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 211","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586816/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142564725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work Conditions and Family Food Insecurity Among Adults Ages 18-64: United States, 2021. 18-64岁成年人的工作条件和家庭粮食不安全:美国,2021。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-17
Laryssa Mykyta, Julie D Weeks

Objective: This report describes differences in the experience of family food insecurity in the past 30 days among working adults ages 18-64 by selected work conditions.

Methods: Using data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on working adults ages 18-64, family food insecurity in the past 30 days was examined by selected work conditions, including type of work shift, work schedule inflexibilities, advance notice of work schedule, and monthly change in earnings. Bivariate associations between family food insecurity and each type of work condition were examined, and logistic regression models were used to estimate associations adjusting for age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, nativity status, marital status, presence of children in family, educational attainment, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, employed full time, occupation, health status, disability status, rural residence, and region. Model-adjusted prevalence of family food insecurity among working adults by type of work conditions is reported.

Results: In 2021, 4.4% of working adults ages 18-64 lived in families experiencing food insecurity. Differences in family food insecurity by work conditions persisted even after adjusting for potential confounders. After adjustment, those working rotating or other types of shifts were more likely to report family food insecurity (5.7%) compared with day shift workers (4.0%). Workers who reported that it was very difficult or somewhat difficult to change their work schedule were more likely to experience family food insecurity (6.3%) than workers who reported it was very easy or somewhat easy to change their work schedule (3.8%). Food insecurity also varied by monthly change in earnings, from 3.9% among workers whose earnings did not change to 5.5% among workers whose earnings changed at least a moderate amount from month to month.

目的:本报告描述了在选定的工作条件下,过去30天内18-64岁在职成年人的家庭粮食不安全体验的差异。方法:利用2021年全国18-64岁在职成年人健康访谈调查的数据,通过选定的工作条件,包括工作班次类型、工作时间表不灵活性、工作时间表提前通知和每月收入变化,检查过去30天的家庭粮食不安全状况。研究了家庭食品不安全与每种工作条件之间的双变量关联,并使用logistic回归模型来估计调整年龄、性别、种族和西班牙裔、出生状况、婚姻状况、家庭中是否有孩子、受教育程度、家庭收入占联邦贫困水平的百分比、全职工作、职业、健康状况、残疾状况、农村居住和地区的关联。报告了按工作条件类型调整的工作成年人中家庭粮食不安全的流行程度。结果:2021年,4.4%的18-64岁在职成年人生活在粮食不安全的家庭中。即使在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,工作条件在家庭食品不安全方面的差异仍然存在。调整后,与白班工人(4.0%)相比,轮班或其他类型轮班的工人更有可能报告家庭食品不安全(5.7%)。报告改变工作时间表非常困难或有些困难的工人比报告改变工作时间表非常容易或有些容易的工人(3.8%)更有可能经历家庭粮食不安全(6.3%)。粮食不安全也因每月收入变化而异,从收入没有变化的工人的3.9%到收入每月至少有适度变化的工人的5.5%。
{"title":"Work Conditions and Family Food Insecurity Among Adults Ages 18-64: United States, 2021.","authors":"Laryssa Mykyta, Julie D Weeks","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report describes differences in the experience of family food insecurity in the past 30 days among working adults ages 18-64 by selected work conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on working adults ages 18-64, family food insecurity in the past 30 days was examined by selected work conditions, including type of work shift, work schedule inflexibilities, advance notice of work schedule, and monthly change in earnings. Bivariate associations between family food insecurity and each type of work condition were examined, and logistic regression models were used to estimate associations adjusting for age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, nativity status, marital status, presence of children in family, educational attainment, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, employed full time, occupation, health status, disability status, rural residence, and region. Model-adjusted prevalence of family food insecurity among working adults by type of work conditions is reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021, 4.4% of working adults ages 18-64 lived in families experiencing food insecurity. Differences in family food insecurity by work conditions persisted even after adjusting for potential confounders. After adjustment, those working rotating or other types of shifts were more likely to report family food insecurity (5.7%) compared with day shift workers (4.0%). Workers who reported that it was very difficult or somewhat difficult to change their work schedule were more likely to experience family food insecurity (6.3%) than workers who reported it was very easy or somewhat easy to change their work schedule (3.8%). Food insecurity also varied by monthly change in earnings, from 3.9% among workers whose earnings did not change to 5.5% among workers whose earnings changed at least a moderate amount from month to month.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 212","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Office-based Physicians and Long-term Care Providers. 办公室医生和长期护理人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗的情况。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/159282
Zachary J Peters, Jessica Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Kelly L Myrick, Mohsin Mahar, Carol J DeFrances

Objective: This report examines telemedicine use by office-based physicians and long-term care providers in the United States, stratified by electronic health record use and by provider or practice size. Further, it examines differences in telemedicine use before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset among office-based physicians and assesses telemedicine use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic for long-term care providers.

Methods: Nationally representative estimates in this report are derived from data collected in the 2019 and 2021 National Electronic Health Records Survey, which assesses characteristics of office-based physicians, and the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which assesses characteristics of adult day services centers and residential care communities. Measures include telemedicine using audio with video or web videoconference for patient care, electronic health record use for more than accounting or billing purposes, and size of physician practices and long-term care providers.

Results: In 2021, 80.5% of physicians in office-based settings used telemedicine for patient care, up from 16.0% in 2019. In 2020, 20.5% of adult day services centers and 44.5% of residential care communities used telemedicine to care for users with COVID-19. Office-based physicians, adult day services centers, and residential care communities that used electronic health record systems were more likely to also use telemedicine compared with those not using electronic health records. Large practices and providers were more likely to use telemedicine compared with small practices and providers.

Conclusion: Findings from this report describe telemedicine use among office-based physicians and long-term care providers. Practices and providers that used electronic health records and were larger were more likely to also use telemedicine for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

目的:本报告按电子病历使用情况和医疗机构或诊所规模对美国诊所医生和长期护理提供者的远程医疗使用情况进行了分层研究。此外,报告还研究了 COVID-19 大流行发生前后办公室医生使用远程医疗的差异,并评估了 COVID-19 大流行第一年长期护理提供者使用远程医疗的情况:本报告中具有全国代表性的估计数据来自 2019 年和 2021 年全国电子健康记录调查收集的数据(该调查评估了办公室医生的特征)和 2020 年全国急性期后和长期护理研究收集的数据(该研究评估了成人日间服务中心和住宅护理社区的特征)。衡量标准包括使用音频视频或网络视频会议进行患者护理的远程医疗、电子健康记录的使用目的不限于会计或计费目的,以及医生诊所和长期护理提供者的规模:2021 年,80.5% 的诊室医生将远程医疗用于患者护理,高于 2019 年的 16.0%。2020 年,20.5% 的成人日间服务中心和 44.5% 的寄宿护理社区使用远程医疗为 COVID-19 患者提供护理。与未使用电子健康记录系统的机构相比,使用电子健康记录系统的办公室医生、成人日间服务中心和寄宿护理社区也更有可能使用远程医疗。与小型医疗机构和医疗服务提供者相比,大型医疗机构和医疗服务提供者更有可能使用远程医疗:本报告的研究结果描述了远程医疗在办公室医生和长期护理服务提供者中的使用情况。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,使用电子健康记录且规模较大的医疗机构和医疗服务提供者更有可能使用远程医疗为患者提供护理。
{"title":"Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Office-based Physicians and Long-term Care Providers.","authors":"Zachary J Peters, Jessica Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Kelly L Myrick, Mohsin Mahar, Carol J DeFrances","doi":"10.15620/cdc/159282","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/159282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report examines telemedicine use by office-based physicians and long-term care providers in the United States, stratified by electronic health record use and by provider or practice size. Further, it examines differences in telemedicine use before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset among office-based physicians and assesses telemedicine use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic for long-term care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationally representative estimates in this report are derived from data collected in the 2019 and 2021 National Electronic Health Records Survey, which assesses characteristics of office-based physicians, and the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which assesses characteristics of adult day services centers and residential care communities. Measures include telemedicine using audio with video or web videoconference for patient care, electronic health record use for more than accounting or billing purposes, and size of physician practices and long-term care providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021, 80.5% of physicians in office-based settings used telemedicine for patient care, up from 16.0% in 2019. In 2020, 20.5% of adult day services centers and 44.5% of residential care communities used telemedicine to care for users with COVID-19. Office-based physicians, adult day services centers, and residential care communities that used electronic health record systems were more likely to also use telemedicine compared with those not using electronic health records. Large practices and providers were more likely to use telemedicine compared with small practices and providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this report describe telemedicine use among office-based physicians and long-term care providers. Practices and providers that used electronic health records and were larger were more likely to also use telemedicine for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 210","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533128/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142546359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prescription Medication Use, Coverage, and Nonadherence Among Adults Age 65 and Older: United States, 2021-2022. 美国,2021-2022 年 65 岁及以上老年人的处方药使用、覆盖和不依从情况:美国,2021-2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/160016
Robin A Cohen, Laryssa Mykyta

Objectives: This report provides a comprehensive look at prescription medication use, prescription drug coverage, and cost-related nonadherence among adults age 65 and older (older adults).

Methods: Data from the 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to report prescription medication use in the past 12 months, prescription drug coverage at the time of interview, and cost-related nonadherence in the past 12 months among older adults. Two types of cost-related nonadherence are reported: 1) not getting needed prescription medication due to cost; and 2) not taking medication as prescribed due to cost (skipping doses, delaying filling a prescription, and taking less medication than prescribed) in the past 12 months. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, food insecurity, urbanization, education, marital status, health insurance coverage, health status, disability status, and number of chronic conditions.

Results: In 2021-2022, 88.6% of older adults took prescription medication, 82.7% had prescription drug coverage, 3.6% did not get needed prescription medication due to cost, and 3.4% did not take medication as prescribed due to cost. Older adults with no prescription drug coverage were more likely to not get prescription medication and to not take needed medication as prescribed than older adults with private or public prescription drug coverage. For both measures, cost-related nonadherence was six times higher among older adults who were food insecure compared with those who were food secure, and more than twice as likely among older adults reporting fair or poor health or with disabilities compared with those in excellent, very good, or good health, or without disabilities.

目的本报告全面介绍了 65 岁及以上成年人(老年人)的处方药使用情况、处方药覆盖范围以及与费用相关的不依从性:方法:采用 2021-2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,报告老年人在过去 12 个月中的处方药使用情况、访谈时的处方药覆盖情况以及过去 12 个月中与费用相关的不依从情况。报告了两种与费用相关的不坚持用药情况:1) 过去 12 个月中因费用问题而无法获得所需的处方药;以及 2) 过去 12 个月中因费用问题而未按处方服药(跳过剂量、延迟开处方以及服用比处方少的药物)。所有估计值均按性别、年龄组、种族和西班牙裔、家庭收入、粮食不安全、城市化、教育程度、婚姻状况、医疗保险覆盖率、健康状况、残疾状况和慢性病数量进行了分类:2021-2022年,88.6%的老年人服用处方药,82.7%的老年人有处方药保险,3.6%的老年人因费用问题没有获得所需的处方药,3.4%的老年人因费用问题没有按处方服药。与拥有私人或公共处方药保险的老年人相比,没有处方药保险的老年人更有可能得不到处方药,也更有可能不按处方服用所需的药物。就这两项指标而言,与食物有保障的老年人相比,食物无保障的老年人因费用而不坚持用药的比例要高出六倍;与健康状况极好、非常好或良好或没有残疾的老年人相比,健康状况一般或较差或有残疾的老年人因费用而不坚持用药的比例要高出两倍多。
{"title":"Prescription Medication Use, Coverage, and Nonadherence Among Adults Age 65 and Older: United States, 2021-2022.","authors":"Robin A Cohen, Laryssa Mykyta","doi":"10.15620/cdc/160016","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/160016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This report provides a comprehensive look at prescription medication use, prescription drug coverage, and cost-related nonadherence among adults age 65 and older (older adults).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to report prescription medication use in the past 12 months, prescription drug coverage at the time of interview, and cost-related nonadherence in the past 12 months among older adults. Two types of cost-related nonadherence are reported: 1) not getting needed prescription medication due to cost; and 2) not taking medication as prescribed due to cost (skipping doses, delaying filling a prescription, and taking less medication than prescribed) in the past 12 months. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, food insecurity, urbanization, education, marital status, health insurance coverage, health status, disability status, and number of chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021-2022, 88.6% of older adults took prescription medication, 82.7% had prescription drug coverage, 3.6% did not get needed prescription medication due to cost, and 3.4% did not take medication as prescribed due to cost. Older adults with no prescription drug coverage were more likely to not get prescription medication and to not take needed medication as prescribed than older adults with private or public prescription drug coverage. For both measures, cost-related nonadherence was six times higher among older adults who were food insecure compared with those who were food secure, and more than twice as likely among older adults reporting fair or poor health or with disabilities compared with those in excellent, very good, or good health, or without disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 209","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overview of Post-acute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020. 2020 年美国急性期后和长期护理提供者与服务使用者概览》(Overview of Postacute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020)。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/158328
Jessica P Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Amanuel Melekin, Priyanka Singh, Zhaohui Lu, Manisha Sengupta

Objective: This report presents national results from the National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study to describe providers and services users in seven major settings of paid, regulated post-acute and long-term care services in the United States.

Methods: Data are from the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which includes surveys of adult day services centers and residential care communities and administrative data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on home health agencies, hospices, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, and nursing homes.

Results: The findings show variation in characteristics of the seven post-acute and long-term care settings. About 68,150 providers served roughly 7.3 million people in the United States; about one-half of these providers were residential care communities, and about one-quarter were nursing homes. The Northeast had a higher percentage of adult day services centers than other settings, the Midwest had a higher percentage of nursing homes, the South had a higher percentage of long-term care hospitals, and the West had a higher percentage of residential care communities. Among the settings, more registered nurses were employed in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals, and more licensed practical nurses in home health agencies and long-term care hospitals. The most common services were skilled nursing and therapeutic services. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of users younger than age 65, while nearly one-half of hospice and nursing home users were age 85 and older. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of other non-Hispanic and Hispanic users among the settings. The percentage of users with selected diagnoses and activities of daily living difficulties varied by setting.

Conclusion: The providers described in this report comprise a large share of the U.S. post-acute and long-term care industry. This report provides the most recent nationally representative information on these providers and services users and updates findings from previous National Center for Health Statistics reports.

目的本报告介绍了 "全国急性期后和长期护理研究"(National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study)的全国性结果,描述了美国七种主要有偿、受监管的急性期后和长期护理服务机构的提供者和服务使用者的情况:数据来自 2020 年全国急性期后和长期护理研究,其中包括对成人日间服务中心和寄宿护理社区的调查,以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心关于家庭保健机构、临终关怀机构、住院康复机构、长期护理医院和疗养院的管理数据:结果:研究结果表明,七种急性期后护理和长期护理机构的特点各不相同。美国约有 68150 家医疗机构为大约 730 万人提供服务;其中约有二分之一是住院护理社区,约有四分之一是疗养院。东北部地区成人日间服务中心的比例高于其他地区,中西部地区疗养院的比例高于其他地区,南部地区长期护理医院的比例高于其他地区,西部地区住院护理社区的比例高于其他地区。在各种机构中,住院康复机构和长期护理医院雇用了更多的注册护士,家庭保健机构和长期护理医院雇用了更多的执业护士。最常见的服务是专业护理和治疗服务。成人日间服务中心 65 岁以下的使用者比例最高,而临终关怀和护理院的使用者近一半年龄在 85 岁及以上。在所有机构中,成人日间服务中心的其他非西班牙裔和西班牙裔使用者比例最高。有特定诊断和日常生活困难的使用者比例因机构而异:本报告中描述的医疗服务提供者在美国急性期后和长期护理行业中占有很大份额。本报告提供了有关这些提供者和服务使用者的最新全国代表性信息,并更新了国家卫生统计中心之前报告的调查结果。
{"title":"Overview of Post-acute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020.","authors":"Jessica P Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Amanuel Melekin, Priyanka Singh, Zhaohui Lu, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"10.15620/cdc/158328","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/158328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report presents national results from the National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study to describe providers and services users in seven major settings of paid, regulated post-acute and long-term care services in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which includes surveys of adult day services centers and residential care communities and administrative data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on home health agencies, hospices, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, and nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings show variation in characteristics of the seven post-acute and long-term care settings. About 68,150 providers served roughly 7.3 million people in the United States; about one-half of these providers were residential care communities, and about one-quarter were nursing homes. The Northeast had a higher percentage of adult day services centers than other settings, the Midwest had a higher percentage of nursing homes, the South had a higher percentage of long-term care hospitals, and the West had a higher percentage of residential care communities. Among the settings, more registered nurses were employed in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals, and more licensed practical nurses in home health agencies and long-term care hospitals. The most common services were skilled nursing and therapeutic services. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of users younger than age 65, while nearly one-half of hospice and nursing home users were age 85 and older. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of other non-Hispanic and Hispanic users among the settings. The percentage of users with selected diagnoses and activities of daily living difficulties varied by setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The providers described in this report comprise a large share of the U.S. post-acute and long-term care industry. This report provides the most recent nationally representative information on these providers and services users and updates findings from previous National Center for Health Statistics reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 208","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533109/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142546358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
National health statistics reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1