首页 > 最新文献

National health statistics reports最新文献

英文 中文
Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022. 按选定特征分列的成年人到保健中心就诊的情况:美国,2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: CS353454
Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman

Objective: This report describes care received at health centers in the United States in 2022. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics.

Methods: The data presented in this report are from the 2022 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers and federally qualified health center look-alikes and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Results: During 2022, an estimated 89.5 million visits were made by adults to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 349.4 visits per 1,000 adults. The visit rate among women was higher than for men. Differences in visit rates by age were not significant. Adults who were not married accounted for 48.2% of visits, and adults who were married accounted for 37.6% of visits. More than one-half of health center visits were disease-related (61.4%). Symptoms-related diagnoses accounted for 22.0% of visits. Screenings (12.6%) and examinations (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Social determinants of health were listed as a reason for the visit at 2.0% of health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category (29.1%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. Mental disorders represented the most common disease category among adults ages 18-44.

Conclusions: Women visited health centers at a higher rate than men. In addition, patient and visit characteristics, including marital status and diagnoses, differed by age.

目的:本报告介绍了 2022 年美国医疗中心提供的医疗服务。方法:本报告中的数据来自 2022 年全国非住院医疗护理调查健康中心部分。数据收集自联邦合格医疗中心和联邦合格医疗中心类似机构,并经过加权处理,得出具有全国代表性的美国 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区医疗中心就诊人次估计数:2022 年期间,美国成年人到保健中心就诊的人次估计为 8950 万,每 1000 名成年人中就诊的总人次为 349.4。女性的就诊率高于男性。不同年龄段的就诊率差异不大。未婚成年人占就诊人数的 48.2%,已婚成年人占就诊人数的 37.6%。超过一半的健康中心就诊是与疾病相关的(61.4%)。与症状相关的诊断占就诊人数的 22.0%。筛查(12.6%)和检查(10.2%)也是保健中心就诊的常见原因。有 2.0% 的健康中心就诊者将健康的社会决定因素列为就诊原因。内分泌疾病是最常被提及的疾病类别(29.1%),无论是在总体上还是在 45 岁及以上的成年人中。精神障碍是 18-44 岁成年人中最常见的疾病类别:结论:女性到保健中心就诊的比例高于男性。此外,患者和就诊者的特征,包括婚姻状况和诊断,因年龄而异。
{"title":"Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022.","authors":"Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman","doi":"CS353454","DOIUrl":"CS353454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report describes care received at health centers in the United States in 2022. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data presented in this report are from the 2022 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers and federally qualified health center look-alikes and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, an estimated 89.5 million visits were made by adults to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 349.4 visits per 1,000 adults. The visit rate among women was higher than for men. Differences in visit rates by age were not significant. Adults who were not married accounted for 48.2% of visits, and adults who were married accounted for 37.6% of visits. More than one-half of health center visits were disease-related (61.4%). Symptoms-related diagnoses accounted for 22.0% of visits. Screenings (12.6%) and examinations (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Social determinants of health were listed as a reason for the visit at 2.0% of health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category (29.1%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. Mental disorders represented the most common disease category among adults ages 18-44.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women visited health centers at a higher rate than men. In addition, patient and visit characteristics, including marital status and diagnoses, differed by age.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 211","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142564725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Office-based Physicians and Long-term Care Providers. 办公室医生和长期护理人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用远程医疗的情况。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/159282
Zachary J Peters, Jessica Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Kelly L Myrick, Mohsin Mahar, Carol J DeFrances

Objective: This report examines telemedicine use by office-based physicians and long-term care providers in the United States, stratified by electronic health record use and by provider or practice size. Further, it examines differences in telemedicine use before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset among office-based physicians and assesses telemedicine use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic for long-term care providers.

Methods: Nationally representative estimates in this report are derived from data collected in the 2019 and 2021 National Electronic Health Records Survey, which assesses characteristics of office-based physicians, and the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which assesses characteristics of adult day services centers and residential care communities. Measures include telemedicine using audio with video or web videoconference for patient care, electronic health record use for more than accounting or billing purposes, and size of physician practices and long-term care providers.

Results: In 2021, 80.5% of physicians in office-based settings used telemedicine for patient care, up from 16.0% in 2019. In 2020, 20.5% of adult day services centers and 44.5% of residential care communities used telemedicine to care for users with COVID-19. Office-based physicians, adult day services centers, and residential care communities that used electronic health record systems were more likely to also use telemedicine compared with those not using electronic health records. Large practices and providers were more likely to use telemedicine compared with small practices and providers.

Conclusion: Findings from this report describe telemedicine use among office-based physicians and long-term care providers. Practices and providers that used electronic health records and were larger were more likely to also use telemedicine for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

目的:本报告按电子病历使用情况和医疗机构或诊所规模对美国诊所医生和长期护理提供者的远程医疗使用情况进行了分层研究。此外,报告还研究了 COVID-19 大流行发生前后办公室医生使用远程医疗的差异,并评估了 COVID-19 大流行第一年长期护理提供者使用远程医疗的情况:本报告中具有全国代表性的估计数据来自 2019 年和 2021 年全国电子健康记录调查收集的数据(该调查评估了办公室医生的特征)和 2020 年全国急性期后和长期护理研究收集的数据(该研究评估了成人日间服务中心和住宅护理社区的特征)。衡量标准包括使用音频视频或网络视频会议进行患者护理的远程医疗、电子健康记录的使用目的不限于会计或计费目的,以及医生诊所和长期护理提供者的规模:2021 年,80.5% 的诊室医生将远程医疗用于患者护理,高于 2019 年的 16.0%。2020 年,20.5% 的成人日间服务中心和 44.5% 的寄宿护理社区使用远程医疗为 COVID-19 患者提供护理。与未使用电子健康记录系统的机构相比,使用电子健康记录系统的办公室医生、成人日间服务中心和寄宿护理社区也更有可能使用远程医疗。与小型医疗机构和医疗服务提供者相比,大型医疗机构和医疗服务提供者更有可能使用远程医疗:本报告的研究结果描述了远程医疗在办公室医生和长期护理服务提供者中的使用情况。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,使用电子健康记录且规模较大的医疗机构和医疗服务提供者更有可能使用远程医疗为患者提供护理。
{"title":"Telemedicine Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Office-based Physicians and Long-term Care Providers.","authors":"Zachary J Peters, Jessica Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Kelly L Myrick, Mohsin Mahar, Carol J DeFrances","doi":"10.15620/cdc/159282","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/159282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report examines telemedicine use by office-based physicians and long-term care providers in the United States, stratified by electronic health record use and by provider or practice size. Further, it examines differences in telemedicine use before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset among office-based physicians and assesses telemedicine use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic for long-term care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationally representative estimates in this report are derived from data collected in the 2019 and 2021 National Electronic Health Records Survey, which assesses characteristics of office-based physicians, and the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which assesses characteristics of adult day services centers and residential care communities. Measures include telemedicine using audio with video or web videoconference for patient care, electronic health record use for more than accounting or billing purposes, and size of physician practices and long-term care providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021, 80.5% of physicians in office-based settings used telemedicine for patient care, up from 16.0% in 2019. In 2020, 20.5% of adult day services centers and 44.5% of residential care communities used telemedicine to care for users with COVID-19. Office-based physicians, adult day services centers, and residential care communities that used electronic health record systems were more likely to also use telemedicine compared with those not using electronic health records. Large practices and providers were more likely to use telemedicine compared with small practices and providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this report describe telemedicine use among office-based physicians and long-term care providers. Practices and providers that used electronic health records and were larger were more likely to also use telemedicine for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 210","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533128/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142546359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prescription Medication Use, Coverage, and Nonadherence Among Adults Age 65 and Older: United States, 2021-2022. 美国,2021-2022 年 65 岁及以上老年人的处方药使用、覆盖和不依从情况:美国,2021-2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/160016
Robin A Cohen, Laryssa Mykyta

Objectives: This report provides a comprehensive look at prescription medication use, prescription drug coverage, and cost-related nonadherence among adults age 65 and older (older adults).

Methods: Data from the 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to report prescription medication use in the past 12 months, prescription drug coverage at the time of interview, and cost-related nonadherence in the past 12 months among older adults. Two types of cost-related nonadherence are reported: 1) not getting needed prescription medication due to cost; and 2) not taking medication as prescribed due to cost (skipping doses, delaying filling a prescription, and taking less medication than prescribed) in the past 12 months. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, food insecurity, urbanization, education, marital status, health insurance coverage, health status, disability status, and number of chronic conditions.

Results: In 2021-2022, 88.6% of older adults took prescription medication, 82.7% had prescription drug coverage, 3.6% did not get needed prescription medication due to cost, and 3.4% did not take medication as prescribed due to cost. Older adults with no prescription drug coverage were more likely to not get prescription medication and to not take needed medication as prescribed than older adults with private or public prescription drug coverage. For both measures, cost-related nonadherence was six times higher among older adults who were food insecure compared with those who were food secure, and more than twice as likely among older adults reporting fair or poor health or with disabilities compared with those in excellent, very good, or good health, or without disabilities.

目的本报告全面介绍了 65 岁及以上成年人(老年人)的处方药使用情况、处方药覆盖范围以及与费用相关的不依从性:方法:采用 2021-2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,报告老年人在过去 12 个月中的处方药使用情况、访谈时的处方药覆盖情况以及过去 12 个月中与费用相关的不依从情况。报告了两种与费用相关的不坚持用药情况:1) 过去 12 个月中因费用问题而无法获得所需的处方药;以及 2) 过去 12 个月中因费用问题而未按处方服药(跳过剂量、延迟开处方以及服用比处方少的药物)。所有估计值均按性别、年龄组、种族和西班牙裔、家庭收入、粮食不安全、城市化、教育程度、婚姻状况、医疗保险覆盖率、健康状况、残疾状况和慢性病数量进行了分类:2021-2022年,88.6%的老年人服用处方药,82.7%的老年人有处方药保险,3.6%的老年人因费用问题没有获得所需的处方药,3.4%的老年人因费用问题没有按处方服药。与拥有私人或公共处方药保险的老年人相比,没有处方药保险的老年人更有可能得不到处方药,也更有可能不按处方服用所需的药物。就这两项指标而言,与食物有保障的老年人相比,食物无保障的老年人因费用而不坚持用药的比例要高出六倍;与健康状况极好、非常好或良好或没有残疾的老年人相比,健康状况一般或较差或有残疾的老年人因费用而不坚持用药的比例要高出两倍多。
{"title":"Prescription Medication Use, Coverage, and Nonadherence Among Adults Age 65 and Older: United States, 2021-2022.","authors":"Robin A Cohen, Laryssa Mykyta","doi":"10.15620/cdc/160016","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/160016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This report provides a comprehensive look at prescription medication use, prescription drug coverage, and cost-related nonadherence among adults age 65 and older (older adults).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to report prescription medication use in the past 12 months, prescription drug coverage at the time of interview, and cost-related nonadherence in the past 12 months among older adults. Two types of cost-related nonadherence are reported: 1) not getting needed prescription medication due to cost; and 2) not taking medication as prescribed due to cost (skipping doses, delaying filling a prescription, and taking less medication than prescribed) in the past 12 months. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, food insecurity, urbanization, education, marital status, health insurance coverage, health status, disability status, and number of chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021-2022, 88.6% of older adults took prescription medication, 82.7% had prescription drug coverage, 3.6% did not get needed prescription medication due to cost, and 3.4% did not take medication as prescribed due to cost. Older adults with no prescription drug coverage were more likely to not get prescription medication and to not take needed medication as prescribed than older adults with private or public prescription drug coverage. For both measures, cost-related nonadherence was six times higher among older adults who were food insecure compared with those who were food secure, and more than twice as likely among older adults reporting fair or poor health or with disabilities compared with those in excellent, very good, or good health, or without disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 209","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overview of Post-acute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020. 2020 年美国急性期后和长期护理提供者与服务使用者概览》(Overview of Postacute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020)。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/158328
Jessica P Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Amanuel Melekin, Priyanka Singh, Zhaohui Lu, Manisha Sengupta

Objective: This report presents national results from the National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study to describe providers and services users in seven major settings of paid, regulated post-acute and long-term care services in the United States.

Methods: Data are from the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which includes surveys of adult day services centers and residential care communities and administrative data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on home health agencies, hospices, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, and nursing homes.

Results: The findings show variation in characteristics of the seven post-acute and long-term care settings. About 68,150 providers served roughly 7.3 million people in the United States; about one-half of these providers were residential care communities, and about one-quarter were nursing homes. The Northeast had a higher percentage of adult day services centers than other settings, the Midwest had a higher percentage of nursing homes, the South had a higher percentage of long-term care hospitals, and the West had a higher percentage of residential care communities. Among the settings, more registered nurses were employed in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals, and more licensed practical nurses in home health agencies and long-term care hospitals. The most common services were skilled nursing and therapeutic services. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of users younger than age 65, while nearly one-half of hospice and nursing home users were age 85 and older. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of other non-Hispanic and Hispanic users among the settings. The percentage of users with selected diagnoses and activities of daily living difficulties varied by setting.

Conclusion: The providers described in this report comprise a large share of the U.S. post-acute and long-term care industry. This report provides the most recent nationally representative information on these providers and services users and updates findings from previous National Center for Health Statistics reports.

目的本报告介绍了 "全国急性期后和长期护理研究"(National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study)的全国性结果,描述了美国七种主要有偿、受监管的急性期后和长期护理服务机构的提供者和服务使用者的情况:数据来自 2020 年全国急性期后和长期护理研究,其中包括对成人日间服务中心和寄宿护理社区的调查,以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心关于家庭保健机构、临终关怀机构、住院康复机构、长期护理医院和疗养院的管理数据:结果:研究结果表明,七种急性期后护理和长期护理机构的特点各不相同。美国约有 68150 家医疗机构为大约 730 万人提供服务;其中约有二分之一是住院护理社区,约有四分之一是疗养院。东北部地区成人日间服务中心的比例高于其他地区,中西部地区疗养院的比例高于其他地区,南部地区长期护理医院的比例高于其他地区,西部地区住院护理社区的比例高于其他地区。在各种机构中,住院康复机构和长期护理医院雇用了更多的注册护士,家庭保健机构和长期护理医院雇用了更多的执业护士。最常见的服务是专业护理和治疗服务。成人日间服务中心 65 岁以下的使用者比例最高,而临终关怀和护理院的使用者近一半年龄在 85 岁及以上。在所有机构中,成人日间服务中心的其他非西班牙裔和西班牙裔使用者比例最高。有特定诊断和日常生活困难的使用者比例因机构而异:本报告中描述的医疗服务提供者在美国急性期后和长期护理行业中占有很大份额。本报告提供了有关这些提供者和服务使用者的最新全国代表性信息,并更新了国家卫生统计中心之前报告的调查结果。
{"title":"Overview of Post-acute and Long-term Care Providers and Services Users in the United States, 2020.","authors":"Jessica P Lendon, Christine Caffrey, Amanuel Melekin, Priyanka Singh, Zhaohui Lu, Manisha Sengupta","doi":"10.15620/cdc/158328","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/158328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report presents national results from the National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study to describe providers and services users in seven major settings of paid, regulated post-acute and long-term care services in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the 2020 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, which includes surveys of adult day services centers and residential care communities and administrative data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on home health agencies, hospices, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, and nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings show variation in characteristics of the seven post-acute and long-term care settings. About 68,150 providers served roughly 7.3 million people in the United States; about one-half of these providers were residential care communities, and about one-quarter were nursing homes. The Northeast had a higher percentage of adult day services centers than other settings, the Midwest had a higher percentage of nursing homes, the South had a higher percentage of long-term care hospitals, and the West had a higher percentage of residential care communities. Among the settings, more registered nurses were employed in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term care hospitals, and more licensed practical nurses in home health agencies and long-term care hospitals. The most common services were skilled nursing and therapeutic services. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of users younger than age 65, while nearly one-half of hospice and nursing home users were age 85 and older. Adult day services centers had the highest percentage of other non-Hispanic and Hispanic users among the settings. The percentage of users with selected diagnoses and activities of daily living difficulties varied by setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The providers described in this report comprise a large share of the U.S. post-acute and long-term care industry. This report provides the most recent nationally representative information on these providers and services users and updates findings from previous National Center for Health Statistics reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 208","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533109/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142546358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sociodemographic Differences in Nonfinancial Access Barriers to Health Care Among Adults: United States, 2022. 美国 2022 年成年人非经济医疗障碍的社会人口差异:美国,2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/158782
Amanda E Ng, Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, James M Dahlhamer

Objective: Nonfinancial access barriers to care describe various reasons why adults may delay or not get medical care, beyond cost. This report focuses on five access barriers to care and describes the percentage of U.S. adults who delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because of 1) being too busy with work or other commitments; 2) an appointment not being available when needed; 3) not being able to get to the doctor's office or clinic when open; 4) difficulty finding a doctor, clinic, or hospital that would accept their health insurance; and 5) it taking too long to get to the doctor's office or clinic from their house or work.

Methods: Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to produce estimates of the percentage of adults who delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because of those access barriers to care, overall and by selected sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: Among U.S. adults in 2022, 12.5% delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because they were too busy to go to a provider, 10.6% could not find an available appointment when needed, 4.6% were unable to get to a provider when open, 4.4% had difficulty finding a doctor compatible with their health insurance, and 2.4% responded that it takes too long to get to a provider. Percentages varied by sociodemographic characteristics.

Conclusion: This study provides nationally representative estimates of selected nonfinancial access barriers to medical care, both overall and for selected sociodemographic groups. Findings suggest that nonfinancial access barriers to care are widespread in the United States, and ongoing monitoring may help to address inequities in access to care.

目的:获得医疗服务的非经济障碍描述了除费用以外,成年人推迟或不接受医疗服务的各种原因。本报告重点讨论了五种获得医疗服务的障碍,并描述了在过去 12 个月中由于以下原因而推迟或不接受医疗服务的美国成年人所占的比例:1)工作或其他事务太忙;2)在需要时无法预约;3)在医生办公室或诊所开门时无法前往;4)难以找到接受其医疗保险的医生、诊所或医院;以及 5)从家中或工作地点前往医生办公室或诊所需要花费太长时间:方法:利用 2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,估算出在过去 12 个月中因这些就医障碍而推迟或没有就医的成年人的总体比例,并按选定的社会人口特征进行分类:在 2022 年的美国成年人中,12.5% 的人在过去 12 个月中因为太忙而没有去医疗机构就诊,10.6% 的人在需要时找不到合适的预约,4.6% 的人在医疗机构开放时无法前往就诊,4.4% 的人很难找到与他们的医疗保险相符的医生,2.4% 的人回答去医疗机构就诊时间太长。比例因社会人口特征而异:这项研究提供了全国范围内具有代表性的特定非经济就医障碍的估计值,包括总体情况和特定社会人口群体的情况。研究结果表明,非经济性就医障碍在美国很普遍,持续监测可能有助于解决就医不平等问题。
{"title":"Sociodemographic Differences in Nonfinancial Access Barriers to Health Care Among Adults: United States, 2022.","authors":"Amanda E Ng, Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, James M Dahlhamer","doi":"10.15620/cdc/158782","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/158782","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nonfinancial access barriers to care describe various reasons why adults may delay or not get medical care, beyond cost. This report focuses on five access barriers to care and describes the percentage of U.S. adults who delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because of 1) being too busy with work or other commitments; 2) an appointment not being available when needed; 3) not being able to get to the doctor's office or clinic when open; 4) difficulty finding a doctor, clinic, or hospital that would accept their health insurance; and 5) it taking too long to get to the doctor's office or clinic from their house or work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to produce estimates of the percentage of adults who delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because of those access barriers to care, overall and by selected sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among U.S. adults in 2022, 12.5% delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because they were too busy to go to a provider, 10.6% could not find an available appointment when needed, 4.6% were unable to get to a provider when open, 4.4% had difficulty finding a doctor compatible with their health insurance, and 2.4% responded that it takes too long to get to a provider. Percentages varied by sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides nationally representative estimates of selected nonfinancial access barriers to medical care, both overall and for selected sociodemographic groups. Findings suggest that nonfinancial access barriers to care are widespread in the United States, and ongoing monitoring may help to address inequities in access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 207","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142470289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived Social and Emotional Support Among Teenagers: United States, July 2021-December 2022. 青少年感知到的社会和情感支持:美国,2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/156514
Benjamin Zablotsky, Amanda E Ng, Lindsey I Black, Jonaki Bose, Jessica R Jones, Aaron K Maitland, Stephen J Blumberg

Objective: This report uses data from the National Health Interview Survey and National Health Interview Survey-Teen to estimate the prevalence of self-reported social and emotional support among teenagers ages 12-17 years, describe differences in health and well-being outcomes by level of support received, and compare teen- and parent-reported estimates for social and emotional support overall and by selected teen and family characteristics.

Methods: The percentage of teenagers who self-reported always or usually receiving social and emotional support by selected demographic characteristics, and potential differences in health outcomes by level of support, were estimated using data from the National Health Interview Survey-Teen collected from July 2021 through December 2022. In addition, data from the same time period from the National Health Interview Survey were used to compare parent-reported estimates of their teenager's social and emotional supports with the teenager's self-reported estimates.

Results: In 2021-2022, 58.5% of teenagers reported always or usually receiving the social and emotional support they needed. Differences were seen by several demographic characteristics including sex, race and Hispanic origin, sexual or gender minority status, highest parental education level, and family income level. Teenagers who always or usually received support were less likely to report poor or fair health, anxiety or depression symptoms, very low life satisfaction, and poor sleep quality. Parents consistently reported higher perceived levels of their teenager's social and emotional support compared with the teenager's self-report.

目的:本报告利用《全国健康访谈调查》和《全国健康访谈调查-青少年》中的数据,估算了 12-17 岁青少年自我报告的社会和情感支持的普遍程度,描述了所获支持程度在健康和幸福结果方面的差异,并比较了青少年和家长报告的社会和情感支持总体估算值,以及所选青少年和家庭特征的估算值:方法:利用 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月期间收集的 "全国青少年健康访谈调查"(National Health Interview Survey-Teen)数据,按选定的人口特征估算了自称总是或通常接受社会和情感支持的青少年比例,并按支持程度估算了健康结果的潜在差异。此外,我们还利用全国健康访谈调查同一时期的数据,对家长报告的青少年社会和情感支持估计值与青少年自我报告的估计值进行了比较:2021-2022年,58.5%的青少年表示总是或通常会得到他们所需的社交和情感支持。性别、种族和西班牙血统、性少数群体或性别少数群体身份、父母最高教育水平和家庭收入水平等人口统计学特征均存在差异。总是或通常获得支持的青少年较少报告健康状况差或一般、焦虑或抑郁症状、生活满意度极低和睡眠质量差。与青少年的自我报告相比,家长对青少年的社会和情感支持的认知水平一直较高。
{"title":"Perceived Social and Emotional Support Among Teenagers: United States, July 2021-December 2022.","authors":"Benjamin Zablotsky, Amanda E Ng, Lindsey I Black, Jonaki Bose, Jessica R Jones, Aaron K Maitland, Stephen J Blumberg","doi":"10.15620/cdc/156514","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/156514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report uses data from the National Health Interview Survey and National Health Interview Survey-Teen to estimate the prevalence of self-reported social and emotional support among teenagers ages 12-17 years, describe differences in health and well-being outcomes by level of support received, and compare teen- and parent-reported estimates for social and emotional support overall and by selected teen and family characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The percentage of teenagers who self-reported always or usually receiving social and emotional support by selected demographic characteristics, and potential differences in health outcomes by level of support, were estimated using data from the National Health Interview Survey-Teen collected from July 2021 through December 2022. In addition, data from the same time period from the National Health Interview Survey were used to compare parent-reported estimates of their teenager's social and emotional supports with the teenager's self-reported estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021-2022, 58.5% of teenagers reported always or usually receiving the social and emotional support they needed. Differences were seen by several demographic characteristics including sex, race and Hispanic origin, sexual or gender minority status, highest parental education level, and family income level. Teenagers who always or usually received support were less likely to report poor or fair health, anxiety or depression symptoms, very low life satisfaction, and poor sleep quality. Parents consistently reported higher perceived levels of their teenager's social and emotional support compared with the teenager's self-report.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 206","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513745/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency Department Visits by Homeless Status and Sex: United States, 2016-2021. 按无家可归者身份和性别分列的急诊就诊人数:美国,2016-2021 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Susan M Schappert, Loredana Santo

Objectives-This report describes emergency department (ED) visits by homeless status and sex. Methods-Nationally representative estimates were calculated from data collected in the 2016-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual national probability sample survey of ED visits in the United States. Visits by people experiencing homelessness were defined using data on patient residence from medical records. Visits by males and females experiencing homelessness are compared with each other and with visits by males and females not experiencing homelessness. Results-During 2016-2021, approximately 981,000 and 460,000 ED visits were made annually by males and females experiencing homelessness, respectively. Significant differences by sex were found for this population for many ED visit characteristics, including arrival by ambulance, diagnoses, and chronic conditions. ED visits by males and females experiencing homelessness also differed significantly from ED visits by males and females not experiencing homelessness based on age, geographic region, expected source of payment, primary diagnosis, chronic conditions, and other characteristics. Conclusion-This report highlights certain differences by sex among the population experiencing homelessness who visited the ED and compares them with people who visited the ED but were not experiencing homelessness.

目标--本报告介绍了按无家可归者身份和性别分列的急诊科(ED)就诊情况。方法--根据 2016-2021 年全美医院非住院医疗护理调查(National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey)收集的数据计算出具有全国代表性的估计值,该调查是一项针对美国急诊科就诊情况的年度全国概率抽样调查。无家可归者的就诊是根据医疗记录中的患者居住地数据定义的。无家可归的男性和女性就诊者之间以及无家可归的男性和女性就诊者之间进行了比较。结果--2016-2021 年间,无家可归的男性和女性每年的急诊就诊人次分别约为 98.1 万和 46 万。在许多急诊室就诊特征(包括救护车到达、诊断和慢性病)方面,该人群的性别差异显著。在年龄、地理区域、预期付款来源、主要诊断、慢性病和其他特征方面,无家可归的男性和女性在急诊室就诊也与非无家可归的男性和女性有显著差异。结论--本报告强调了就诊于急诊室的无家可归者在性别上的某些差异,并将其与就诊于急诊室但并非无家可归者的人群进行了比较。
{"title":"Emergency Department Visits by Homeless Status and Sex: United States, 2016-2021.","authors":"Susan M Schappert, Loredana Santo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report describes emergency department (ED) visits by homeless status and sex. Methods-Nationally representative estimates were calculated from data collected in the 2016-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual national probability sample survey of ED visits in the United States. Visits by people experiencing homelessness were defined using data on patient residence from medical records. Visits by males and females experiencing homelessness are compared with each other and with visits by males and females not experiencing homelessness. Results-During 2016-2021, approximately 981,000 and 460,000 ED visits were made annually by males and females experiencing homelessness, respectively. Significant differences by sex were found for this population for many ED visit characteristics, including arrival by ambulance, diagnoses, and chronic conditions. ED visits by males and females experiencing homelessness also differed significantly from ED visits by males and females not experiencing homelessness based on age, geographic region, expected source of payment, primary diagnosis, chronic conditions, and other characteristics. Conclusion-This report highlights certain differences by sex among the population experiencing homelessness who visited the ED and compares them with people who visited the ED but were not experiencing homelessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 204","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Declines in Telemedicine Use Among Adults: United States, 2021 and 2022. 成人远程医疗使用率下降:美国,2021 年和 2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Jacqueline W Lucas, Xun Wang

Objectives-This report examines changes in telemedicine use among U.S. adults between 2021 and 2022 by selected sociodemographic and geographic characteristics. Methods-Data from the 2021 and 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to assess changes between these 2 years in the percentage of adults who used telemedicine in the previous 12 months, by sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, family income, education, region of residence, urbanization level, and health insurance coverage. Results-Overall, the percentage of adults who used telemedicine in the past 12 months decreased from 37.0% in 2021 to 30.1% in 2022. This pattern was observed across several sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, such as sex, family income, education, region, and urbanization level. Women, adults with a college degree or higher, and adults living in more urban areas were all more likely to use telemedicine in 2022. In 2021 and 2022, uninsured adults ages 18-64 were less likely to use telemedicine compared with those who had private or public insurance, while adults age 65 and older who had Medicare only were less likely to use telemedicine compared with those with other types of insurance. However, for both age groups, telemedicine use decreased from 2021 to 2022 for all insurance types except public coverage for adults ages 18-64. Summary-National Health Interview Survey data may be used to monitor national trends and understand patterns of telemedicine use by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics as the transition forward from the global COVID-19 pandemic continues.

目的-本报告按选定的社会人口和地理特征研究了 2021 年至 2022 年期间美国成年人使用远程医疗的变化情况。方法--采用 2021 年和 2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,按性别、年龄、种族和西班牙裔、家庭收入、教育程度、居住地区、城市化水平和医疗保险覆盖范围,评估过去 12 个月中使用远程医疗的成年人比例在这两年中的变化。结果--总体而言,在过去 12 个月中使用过远程医疗的成年人比例从 2021 年的 37.0% 降至 2022 年的 30.1%。在性别、家庭收入、教育程度、地区和城市化水平等多个社会人口和地理特征方面都观察到了这种模式。2022 年,女性、拥有大学或更高学历的成年人以及生活在更多城市地区的成年人都更有可能使用远程医疗。在 2021 年和 2022 年,与拥有私人或公共保险的成年人相比,18-64 岁没有保险的成年人使用远程医疗的可能性较低;与拥有其他类型保险的成年人相比,65 岁及以上仅拥有医疗保险的成年人使用远程医疗的可能性较低。不过,就这两个年龄组而言,除了 18-64 岁成年人的公共保险外,所有保险类型的远程医疗使用率从 2021 年到 2022 年都有所下降。小结--随着 COVID-19 全球大流行的继续过渡,全国健康访谈调查数据可用于监测全国趋势并了解不同社会人口和地理特征的远程医疗使用模式。
{"title":"Declines in Telemedicine Use Among Adults: United States, 2021 and 2022.","authors":"Jacqueline W Lucas, Xun Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report examines changes in telemedicine use among U.S. adults between 2021 and 2022 by selected sociodemographic and geographic characteristics. Methods-Data from the 2021 and 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to assess changes between these 2 years in the percentage of adults who used telemedicine in the previous 12 months, by sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, family income, education, region of residence, urbanization level, and health insurance coverage. Results-Overall, the percentage of adults who used telemedicine in the past 12 months decreased from 37.0% in 2021 to 30.1% in 2022. This pattern was observed across several sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, such as sex, family income, education, region, and urbanization level. Women, adults with a college degree or higher, and adults living in more urban areas were all more likely to use telemedicine in 2022. In 2021 and 2022, uninsured adults ages 18-64 were less likely to use telemedicine compared with those who had private or public insurance, while adults age 65 and older who had Medicare only were less likely to use telemedicine compared with those with other types of insurance. However, for both age groups, telemedicine use decreased from 2021 to 2022 for all insurance types except public coverage for adults ages 18-64. Summary-National Health Interview Survey data may be used to monitor national trends and understand patterns of telemedicine use by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics as the transition forward from the global COVID-19 pandemic continues.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 205","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnosed Dementia in Adults Age 65 and Older:United States, 2022. 2022 年美国 65 岁及以上成年人中确诊的痴呆症患者人数。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Ellen A Kramarow

Objectives-This report presents estimates of diagnosed dementia in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population age 65 and older by selected sociodemographic characteristics. Methods-Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of noninstitutionalized older adults with a dementia diagnosis. Information was self-reported unless a knowledgeable proxy responded to questions when the respondent was physically or mentally unable to answer. Prevalence of diagnosed dementia among older adults is presented by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, veteran status, education, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, urbanization, and region. Estimates of dementia reporting by proxy respondent status and interview mode also are presented. Results-In 2022, 4.0% of adults age 65 and older reported ever having received a dementia diagnosis. The percentage of adults with a dementia diagnosis was similar for men (3.8%) and women (4.2%). The percentage of adults with a dementia diagnosis increased with age, from 1.7% in those ages 65-74 to 13.1% in those age 85 and older, and decreased with rising education level, from 7.9% in adults age 65 and older with less than a high school diploma to 2.2% in those with a college degree or higher. Overall levels of older adults with a dementia diagnosis did not vary significantly by mode of interview (telephone or in person).

目的-本报告根据选定的社会人口特征,对美国 65 岁及以上非住院老年人口中确诊痴呆症的比例进行了估计。方法--采用 2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据来估算非住院老年人中确诊痴呆症的比例。除非受访者因身体或精神原因无法回答问题,否则信息均为自我报告。根据年龄、性别、种族和西班牙裔、退伍军人身份、教育程度、家庭收入占联邦贫困线的百分比、城市化程度和地区,列出了老年人中确诊痴呆症的流行率。此外,还提供了按代理受访者身份和访谈模式分列的痴呆症报告估计值。结果--2022 年,4.0% 的 65 岁及以上成年人报告曾接受过痴呆症诊断。男性(3.8%)和女性(4.2%)被诊断患有痴呆症的成年人比例相似。被诊断患有痴呆症的成年人比例随着年龄的增长而增加,从 65-74 岁的 1.7% 增加到 85 岁及以上的 13.1%,并随着教育水平的提高而下降,从 65 岁及以上高中以下学历的 7.9% 下降到大学及以上学历的 2.2%。被诊断患有痴呆症的老年人的总体水平并没有因访谈方式(电话访谈或当面访谈)的不同而有明显差异。
{"title":"Diagnosed Dementia in Adults Age 65 and Older:United States, 2022.","authors":"Ellen A Kramarow","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-This report presents estimates of diagnosed dementia in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population age 65 and older by selected sociodemographic characteristics. Methods-Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of noninstitutionalized older adults with a dementia diagnosis. Information was self-reported unless a knowledgeable proxy responded to questions when the respondent was physically or mentally unable to answer. Prevalence of diagnosed dementia among older adults is presented by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, veteran status, education, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, urbanization, and region. Estimates of dementia reporting by proxy respondent status and interview mode also are presented. Results-In 2022, 4.0% of adults age 65 and older reported ever having received a dementia diagnosis. The percentage of adults with a dementia diagnosis was similar for men (3.8%) and women (4.2%). The percentage of adults with a dementia diagnosis increased with age, from 1.7% in those ages 65-74 to 13.1% in those age 85 and older, and decreased with rising education level, from 7.9% in adults age 65 and older with less than a high school diploma to 2.2% in those with a college degree or higher. Overall levels of older adults with a dementia diagnosis did not vary significantly by mode of interview (telephone or in person).</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 203","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141443030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Infertility and Impaired Fecundity in Women and Men in the United States, 2015-2019. 2015-2019 年美国女性和男性的不孕症和生育能力受损情况。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01
Colleen N Nugent, Anjani Chandra

Objectives-Using National Survey of Family Growth data from 2015-2019, this report presents updated national estimates of infertility in U.S. women and men and estimates of impaired fecundity (physical ability to have children) in U.S. women. Detailed demographic breakdowns are also presented, and overall estimates for 2015-2019 are compared with those for 2011-2015. Methods-Data for this report come primarily from the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, which consisted of 21,441 interviews with men and women ages 15-49, conducted from September 2015 through September 2019. The response rate was 65.9% for women and 62.4% for men. Results-The percentage of women ages 15-44 who had impaired fecundity did not change between 2011-2015 and 2015-2019. The percentage of married women with impaired fecundity also remained stable over this time period. Among all women, 13.4% of women ages 15-49 and 15.4% of women ages 25-49 had impaired fecundity in 2015-2019. The percentage of married women ages 15-44 who were infertile rose from 2011-2015 (6.7%) to 2015-2019 (8.7%). Among married and cohabiting women ages 15-49 in 2015-2019, 7.8% had infertility. Both infertility and impaired fecundity were associated with age for nulliparous (never had a live birth) women after adjusting for other factors. Some form of infertility (either subfertility or nonsurgical sterility) was seen in 11.4% of men ages 15-49 and 12.8% of men ages 25-49 in 2015-2019. . Conclusion-Although these findings are not nationally representative, this report illustrates how linked NHCS-HUD data may provide insight into maternal health outcomes of patients who received housing assistance compared with those who did not.

目标-利用 2015-2019 年的全国家庭增长调查数据,本报告介绍了美国女性和男性不孕症的最新全国估计值,以及美国女性生育能力受损(生育子女的身体能力)的估计值。报告还提供了详细的人口统计分类,并将 2015-2019 年的总体估计值与 2011-2015 年的估计值进行了比较。方法--本报告的数据主要来自 2015-2019 年全国家庭成长调查,该调查从 2015 年 9 月至 2019 年 9 月对 21,441 名 15-49 岁的男性和女性进行了访谈。女性的回复率为 65.9%,男性为 62.4%。结果--在 2011-2015 年和 2015-2019 年期间,15-44 岁女性生育力受损的百分比没有变化。在此期间,生育力受损的已婚女性比例也保持稳定。在所有女性中,2015-2019 年有 13.4% 的 15-49 岁女性和 15.4% 的 25-49 岁女性生育力受损。15-44岁已婚妇女中不孕不育的比例从2011-2015年(6.7%)上升到2015-2019年(8.7%)。在2015-2019年的15-49岁已婚和同居女性中,7.8%患有不孕症。在对其他因素进行调整后,不孕症和受孕能力受损均与无子宫(从未生育过活产)女性的年龄有关。在 2015-2019 年期间,11.4% 的 15-49 岁男性和 12.8% 的 25-49 岁男性患有某种形式的不孕症(亚不孕症或非手术不育症)。.结论--尽管这些研究结果不具有全国代表性,但本报告说明了与 NHCS-HUD 数据相关联的数据如何能够帮助人们深入了解获得住房补助的患者与未获得住房补助的患者的孕产妇健康状况。
{"title":"Infertility and Impaired Fecundity in Women and Men in the United States, 2015-2019.","authors":"Colleen N Nugent, Anjani Chandra","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives-Using National Survey of Family Growth data from 2015-2019, this report presents updated national estimates of infertility in U.S. women and men and estimates of impaired fecundity (physical ability to have children) in U.S. women. Detailed demographic breakdowns are also presented, and overall estimates for 2015-2019 are compared with those for 2011-2015. Methods-Data for this report come primarily from the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, which consisted of 21,441 interviews with men and women ages 15-49, conducted from September 2015 through September 2019. The response rate was 65.9% for women and 62.4% for men. Results-The percentage of women ages 15-44 who had impaired fecundity did not change between 2011-2015 and 2015-2019. The percentage of married women with impaired fecundity also remained stable over this time period. Among all women, 13.4% of women ages 15-49 and 15.4% of women ages 25-49 had impaired fecundity in 2015-2019. The percentage of married women ages 15-44 who were infertile rose from 2011-2015 (6.7%) to 2015-2019 (8.7%). Among married and cohabiting women ages 15-49 in 2015-2019, 7.8% had infertility. Both infertility and impaired fecundity were associated with age for nulliparous (never had a live birth) women after adjusting for other factors. Some form of infertility (either subfertility or nonsurgical sterility) was seen in 11.4% of men ages 15-49 and 12.8% of men ages 25-49 in 2015-2019. . Conclusion-Although these findings are not nationally representative, this report illustrates how linked NHCS-HUD data may provide insight into maternal health outcomes of patients who received housing assistance compared with those who did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 202","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140896175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
National health statistics reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1