首页 > 最新文献

National health statistics reports最新文献

英文 中文
Comparing Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Population Estimates Using Different Predictive Equations: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018. 使用不同预测方程比较低密度脂蛋白胆固醇人群估计:2015-2018年全国健康与营养检查调查
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174626
Margaret D Carroll, Jennifer Rammon, Renee Storandt, Eric A Tolliver

Background: Since 1972, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been calculated by the Friedewald equation, which estimates very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as triglycerides divided by 5 and is accurate only for triglycerides <400 mg/dL. The Martin equation, published in 2013 (for triglycerides <400 mg/dL), replaced 5 with a factor varying over an array of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. This array was extended in 2021 for triglycerides 400-<800 mg/dL. In 2020, the Sampson equation, accurate for triglycerides <800 mg/dL, was developed using multiple least squares regression. This report compares LDL-C as calculated by the Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations in a nationally representative sample of adults with triglycerides <400 mg/dL across the distribution of clinical cut points for LDL-C (<70 mg/dL, 70-<100 mg/dL, 100-<160 mg/dL, 160-<190 mg/dL, and ≥190 mg/dL) to assess the impact of equation choice on national estimates.

Methods: Using data on 4,461 adults in the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, classification agreement into the LDL-C categories used for clinical management across the three equations was assessed using kappa statistics for men and women overall and by demographic subgroups. A sensitivity analysis assessed classification agreement between the Martin and Sampson equations for adults with triglycerides <800 mg/dL.

Results: During 2015-2018, 9.8%-10.0% of adults age 20 and older had LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL (Friedewald: 10.0%, Martin: 9.8%, Sampson: 9.8%). Less than 3% had LDL-C >190 mg/dL (Friedewald: 2.3%, Martin: 2.4%, Sampson: 2.6%). Very good agreement between the equations was seen in all subgroups (kappa >0.8).

Conclusions: The three equations for LDL-C produce similar U.S. population-level percent distributions for adults age 20 and older across LDL-C categories.

背景:自1972年以来,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)一直通过Friedewald方程计算,该方程估计极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇为甘油三酯除以5,并且仅对甘油三酯准确。使用2015-2018年全国健康与营养检查调查中4461名成年人的数据,使用kappa统计对男性和女性总体以及人口亚组进行了评估,评估了三个方程中用于临床管理的LDL-C类别的分类一致性。一项敏感性分析评估了成年人甘油三酯的Martin和Sampson方程之间的分类一致性结果:2015-2018年期间,9.8%-10.0%的20岁及以上成年人LDL-C水平为190 mg/dL (Friedewald: 2.3%, Martin: 2.4%, Sampson: 2.6%)。在所有亚组中,方程之间的一致性非常好(kappa >0.8)。结论:LDL-C的三个方程产生了相似的美国20岁及以上成年人LDL-C类别的人口水平百分比分布。
{"title":"Comparing Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Population Estimates Using Different Predictive Equations: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018.","authors":"Margaret D Carroll, Jennifer Rammon, Renee Storandt, Eric A Tolliver","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174626","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 1972, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been calculated by the Friedewald equation, which estimates very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as triglycerides divided by 5 and is accurate only for triglycerides <400 mg/dL. The Martin equation, published in 2013 (for triglycerides <400 mg/dL), replaced 5 with a factor varying over an array of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. This array was extended in 2021 for triglycerides 400-<800 mg/dL. In 2020, the Sampson equation, accurate for triglycerides <800 mg/dL, was developed using multiple least squares regression. This report compares LDL-C as calculated by the Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations in a nationally representative sample of adults with triglycerides <400 mg/dL across the distribution of clinical cut points for LDL-C (<70 mg/dL, 70-<100 mg/dL, 100-<160 mg/dL, 160-<190 mg/dL, and ≥190 mg/dL) to assess the impact of equation choice on national estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data on 4,461 adults in the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, classification agreement into the LDL-C categories used for clinical management across the three equations was assessed using kappa statistics for men and women overall and by demographic subgroups. A sensitivity analysis assessed classification agreement between the Martin and Sampson equations for adults with triglycerides <800 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2015-2018, 9.8%-10.0% of adults age 20 and older had LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL (Friedewald: 10.0%, Martin: 9.8%, Sampson: 9.8%). Less than 3% had LDL-C >190 mg/dL (Friedewald: 2.3%, Martin: 2.4%, Sampson: 2.6%). Very good agreement between the equations was seen in all subgroups (kappa >0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three equations for LDL-C produce similar U.S. population-level percent distributions for adults age 20 and older across LDL-C categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 220","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926850/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Parent and Teen Reports of Teen Healthcare Use: United States, July 2021-December 2023. 青少年医疗保健使用的父母和青少年报告的比较:美国,2021年7月- 2023年12月。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174622
Amanda E Ng, Lauren Bottoms-McClain, Lindsey I Black, Benjamin Zablotsky, Jonaki Bose

Objective: This report examines selected measures of healthcare use among teenagers ages 12-17 by parent- or self-report. Agreement between parent-reported and teen self-reported data is also evaluated.

Methods: The percentage of teenagers with doctor visits, wellness visits, having a usual place of care, having a personal doctor or nurse, and having time alone with a doctor were estimated using teen-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey-Teen collected from July 2021 through December 2023. These estimates were compared with parent-reported estimates from the same time period using data from the National Health Interview Survey. Cohen's kappa and prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values were used to evaluate agreement between parent and teen responses.

Results: Across all measures, parents reported higher healthcare use for their teenagers than teenagers reported for themselves (for example, 91.4% of parents reported a doctor's visit in the last 12 months compared with 83.0% of teenagers). Cohen's kappa values across measures showed fair to slight agreement, with PABAK values showing slightly higher agreement, ranging from slight to substantial. Percentage agreement patterns were most often driven by both parent and teenager affirming healthcare use indicators, except for having time alone with a doctor, which was driven slightly more by the parent and teenager both reporting the teenager had not received this service. Disagreement patterns were driven by parents affirming services the teenager did not; disagreement was highest for having a personal doctor or nurse and time alone with a doctor.

目的:本报告通过父母或自我报告检查了12-17岁青少年医疗保健使用的选定措施。家长报告和青少年自我报告的数据之间的一致性也进行了评估。方法:使用从2021年7月至2023年12月收集的《全国健康访谈调查-青少年》中青少年报告的数据,估计了看医生、健康咨询、有常规护理场所、有私人医生或护士以及与医生单独相处的青少年的百分比。这些估计值与同一时期父母报告的估计值进行了比较,数据来自全国健康访谈调查。Cohen’s kappa和流行校正、偏倚校正kappa (PABAK)值被用来评估家长和青少年的回答是否一致。结果:在所有测量中,父母报告的青少年使用医疗保健的情况高于青少年报告的自己使用医疗保健的情况(例如,91.4%的父母报告在过去12个月内看过医生,而青少年的这一比例为83.0%)。Cohen的kappa值在测量中显示出相当到轻微的一致性,而PABAK值显示出略高的一致性,范围从轻微到实质性。百分比同意模式通常是由父母和青少年确认医疗保健使用指标驱动的,除了与医生单独相处的时间,父母和青少年都报告青少年没有接受过这项服务,这一点稍微多一点。父母肯定青少年没有得到的服务,导致了分歧模式的形成;在拥有私人医生或护士以及与医生单独相处的时间方面,分歧最大。
{"title":"Comparison of Parent and Teen Reports of Teen Healthcare Use: United States, July 2021-December 2023.","authors":"Amanda E Ng, Lauren Bottoms-McClain, Lindsey I Black, Benjamin Zablotsky, Jonaki Bose","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174622","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174622","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report examines selected measures of healthcare use among teenagers ages 12-17 by parent- or self-report. Agreement between parent-reported and teen self-reported data is also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The percentage of teenagers with doctor visits, wellness visits, having a usual place of care, having a personal doctor or nurse, and having time alone with a doctor were estimated using teen-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey-Teen collected from July 2021 through December 2023. These estimates were compared with parent-reported estimates from the same time period using data from the National Health Interview Survey. Cohen's kappa and prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values were used to evaluate agreement between parent and teen responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all measures, parents reported higher healthcare use for their teenagers than teenagers reported for themselves (for example, 91.4% of parents reported a doctor's visit in the last 12 months compared with 83.0% of teenagers). Cohen's kappa values across measures showed fair to slight agreement, with PABAK values showing slightly higher agreement, ranging from slight to substantial. Percentage agreement patterns were most often driven by both parent and teenager affirming healthcare use indicators, except for having time alone with a doctor, which was driven slightly more by the parent and teenager both reporting the teenager had not received this service. Disagreement patterns were driven by parents affirming services the teenager did not; disagreement was highest for having a personal doctor or nurse and time alone with a doctor.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 219","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926997/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Difficulties in Functioning Among Children in the United States: 2021-2023. 美国儿童功能障碍:2021-2023。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174615
Julie D Weeks, Jennifer H Madans, Lindsey I Black, Nazik Elgaddal, Benjamin Zablotsky

Objectives: This report presents national estimates of difficulties in functioning for children ages 2-17.

Methods: 2021-2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data were used to assess difficulties in functioning among children. NHIS has included the Child Functioning Module, developed jointly by UNICEF and the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, since 2019. The module's questions ask about difficulties in the following functional domains: seeing, hearing, walking, communication, behavior, and learning (for all children ages 2-17); fine motor and playing (for children ages 2-4); and self-care, remembering, concentrating, coping with change, relationships, and affect (anxiety and depression) (for children ages 5-17). Prevalence estimates were calculated for different levels of difficulty (a lot of difficulty, some difficulty, or no difficulty) and are presented for overall functioning, by individual functional domain, and by number of functional domains where difficulties were reported. Differences in functioning by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, urbanization level, and family income are also presented.

Results: In 2021-2023, about one-quarter (24.9%) of children ages 2-4 experienced difficulties in functioning (4.1% experienced a lot of difficulty in one or more domains and 20.8% experienced some difficulty). Among children ages 5-17, just over one-half (50.8%) experienced functioning difficulties (13.0% experienced a lot of difficulty and 37.8% experienced some difficulty). The prevalence of functioning difficulties varied by sex, with boys being more likely than girls to experience a lot of difficulty in at least one domain, but differences across other characteristics varied. Functioning difficulties were most prevalent in the domains of communication, learning, behavior, and playing among children ages 2-4. For those ages 5-17, the most prevalent domains were anxiety, accepting change, behavior, depression, and making friends. Among children who experienced functioning difficulties, most had difficulty in only one functional domain.

目的:本报告介绍了国家对2-17岁儿童功能障碍的估计。方法:采用2021-2023年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)数据评估儿童功能障碍。自2019年以来,NHIS纳入了由联合国儿童基金会和华盛顿残疾统计小组联合开发的儿童功能模块。该模块的问题涉及以下功能领域的困难:视觉,听觉,行走,沟通,行为和学习(适用于所有2-17岁的儿童);精细运动和游戏(适合2-4岁儿童);自我照顾、记忆力、注意力集中、应对变化、人际关系和情感(焦虑和抑郁)(适用于5-17岁的儿童)。患病率估计是根据不同的困难程度(很多困难、一些困难或没有困难)计算的,并根据整体功能、个人功能领域和报告困难的功能领域的数量来呈现。不同年龄、性别、种族和西班牙裔、城市化水平和家庭收入的功能差异也有所不同。结果:2021-2023年,约四分之一(24.9%)的2-4岁儿童经历过功能障碍,其中4.1%在一个或多个领域经历了很多困难,20.8%经历了一些困难。在5-17岁的儿童中,略多于一半(50.8%)经历了功能障碍(13.0%经历了很多困难,37.8%经历了一些困难)。功能障碍的普遍程度因性别而异,男孩比女孩更有可能在至少一个领域遇到很多困难,但其他特征的差异则有所不同。在2-4岁的儿童中,功能障碍在沟通、学习、行为和玩耍方面最为普遍。对于5-17岁的人来说,最普遍的领域是焦虑、接受变化、行为、抑郁和交朋友。在经历过功能障碍的儿童中,大多数人只在一个功能领域有困难。
{"title":"Difficulties in Functioning Among Children in the United States: 2021-2023.","authors":"Julie D Weeks, Jennifer H Madans, Lindsey I Black, Nazik Elgaddal, Benjamin Zablotsky","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174615","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174615","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This report presents national estimates of difficulties in functioning for children ages 2-17.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2021-2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data were used to assess difficulties in functioning among children. NHIS has included the Child Functioning Module, developed jointly by UNICEF and the Washington Group on Disability Statistics, since 2019. The module's questions ask about difficulties in the following functional domains: seeing, hearing, walking, communication, behavior, and learning (for all children ages 2-17); fine motor and playing (for children ages 2-4); and self-care, remembering, concentrating, coping with change, relationships, and affect (anxiety and depression) (for children ages 5-17). Prevalence estimates were calculated for different levels of difficulty (a lot of difficulty, some difficulty, or no difficulty) and are presented for overall functioning, by individual functional domain, and by number of functional domains where difficulties were reported. Differences in functioning by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, urbanization level, and family income are also presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021-2023, about one-quarter (24.9%) of children ages 2-4 experienced difficulties in functioning (4.1% experienced a lot of difficulty in one or more domains and 20.8% experienced some difficulty). Among children ages 5-17, just over one-half (50.8%) experienced functioning difficulties (13.0% experienced a lot of difficulty and 37.8% experienced some difficulty). The prevalence of functioning difficulties varied by sex, with boys being more likely than girls to experience a lot of difficulty in at least one domain, but differences across other characteristics varied. Functioning difficulties were most prevalent in the domains of communication, learning, behavior, and playing among children ages 2-4. For those ages 5-17, the most prevalent domains were anxiety, accepting change, behavior, depression, and making friends. Among children who experienced functioning difficulties, most had difficulty in only one functional domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 218","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145604979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personal Care Aides in Adult Day Services Centers and Residential Care Communities: United States, 2022. 成人日间服务中心和住宿护理社区的个人护理助理:美国,2022。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174600
Manisha Sengupta, Christine Caffrey, Jessica P Lendon, Priyanka Singh

Introduction: Personal care aides (aides) are a key part of the long-term care infrastructure and provide hands-on care and support with essential activities of daily living to older and disabled Americans. This report presents the number of aides employed in adult day services centers (ADSC) and residential care communities (RCC), the hours they spend with their service users, and their training and benefits.

Methods: Data are from the ADSC and RCC provider components of the 2022 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study includes several questions on staffing, including about the number of registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs) or licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), and aides employed directly by ADSCs and RCCs. Full-time equivalent (FTE) staff is based on the number of full-time and part-time employees. A measure of hours per user (participant or resident) per day was used to compare staffing levels in the two settings relative to the number of users. Responses to questions on number of hours of training required and types of training and benefits offered to aides were used to compare in and across ADSC and RCC settings.

Results: Of the 15,600 nursing (RN, LPN or LVN, and aide) FTEs employed in ADSCs and 452,000 employed in RCCs, the majority were aides (63.2% and 76.0%, respectively). Both settings often employed at least one aide (56.2% and 75.6%). The average total of all nursing staffing hours per participant or resident per day was 1 hour and 34 minutes for ADSCs and 4 hours and 25 minutes for RCCs. A lower percentage of ADSCs than RCCs offered training in dementia care (50.8% and 72.3%) and end-of-life issues (19.7% and 58.4%).

个人护理助手(助手)是长期护理基础设施的重要组成部分,为美国老年人和残疾人提供日常生活基本活动的实际护理和支持。本报告介绍了在成人日间服务中心(ADSC)和寄宿护理社区(RCC)雇用的助理人数,他们与服务用户相处的时间,以及他们的培训和福利。方法:数据来自国家卫生统计中心每两年进行一次的2022年国家急性后和长期护理研究的ADSC和RCC提供者组成部分。该研究包括几个关于人员配置的问题,包括注册护士(RNs)、执业护士(lpn)或执业护士(LVNs)的数量,以及adsc和rcc直接雇用的助手的数量。全职等值员工(FTE)是根据全职和兼职员工的人数计算的。使用每个用户(参与者或居民)每天的小时数来比较两种设置中相对于用户数量的人员配备水平。对所需培训时数、培训类型和向助手提供的福利等问题的回答用于比较ADSC和RCC设置内和之间的差异。结果:在ADSCs和rcc分别有15600名护士(注册护士、LPN、LVN和助手)和452000名护士中,以助手为主(分别为63.2%和76.0%)。两种设置通常至少有一名助手(56.2%和75.6%)。每位参与者或住院患者每天的护理人员平均总时数为ADSCs为1小时34分钟,rcc为4小时25分钟。与rcc相比,提供痴呆护理培训(50.8%和72.3%)和临终问题培训(19.7%和58.4%)的ADSCs比例较低。
{"title":"Personal Care Aides in Adult Day Services Centers and Residential Care Communities: United States, 2022.","authors":"Manisha Sengupta, Christine Caffrey, Jessica P Lendon, Priyanka Singh","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174600","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Personal care aides (aides) are a key part of the long-term care infrastructure and provide hands-on care and support with essential activities of daily living to older and disabled Americans. This report presents the number of aides employed in adult day services centers (ADSC) and residential care communities (RCC), the hours they spend with their service users, and their training and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the ADSC and RCC provider components of the 2022 National Post-acute and Long-term Care Study, conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics. The study includes several questions on staffing, including about the number of registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs) or licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), and aides employed directly by ADSCs and RCCs. Full-time equivalent (FTE) staff is based on the number of full-time and part-time employees. A measure of hours per user (participant or resident) per day was used to compare staffing levels in the two settings relative to the number of users. Responses to questions on number of hours of training required and types of training and benefits offered to aides were used to compare in and across ADSC and RCC settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15,600 nursing (RN, LPN or LVN, and aide) FTEs employed in ADSCs and 452,000 employed in RCCs, the majority were aides (63.2% and 76.0%, respectively). Both settings often employed at least one aide (56.2% and 75.6%). The average total of all nursing staffing hours per participant or resident per day was 1 hour and 34 minutes for ADSCs and 4 hours and 25 minutes for RCCs. A lower percentage of ADSCs than RCCs offered training in dementia care (50.8% and 72.3%) and end-of-life issues (19.7% and 58.4%).</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 217","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455667/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145054641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Visits to Health Centers, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2023. 按选定特征分列的保健中心访问量:美国,2023年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/174585
Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman

Objective: This report presents national estimates of visits to health centers in the United States in 2023. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics and compared by age, sex, and race and ethnicity.

Methods: Estimates were calculated from the 2023 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and health center program look-alikes, which meet federal requirements but do not receive federal funding. Data were weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Results: During 2023, an estimated 119.9 million visits were made to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 363.2 visits per 1,000 people. The visit rate among females (450.5) was higher than for males (272.4). Visit rates were highest for Hispanic people (767.7) compared with White non-Hispanic (subsequently, White) (167.1), Black non-Hispanic (subsequently, Black) (391.5), and non-Hispanic people of other races (192.4). Differences in visit rates by age were not statistically significant. Diseases accounted for about one-half of health center visits (53.8%), and symptoms and signs accounted for 22.0% of visits. Examinations (12.7%) and screenings (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category at health center visits (24.5%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. For visits by adults ages 18-44, mental health disorders represented the most common disease category (20.3%). Among visits by children and adolescents age 17 and younger, respiratory diseases (14.8%) and mental health disorders (12.9%) were the most common disease categories.

Conclusions: Females visited health centers at a higher rate than males. Hispanic and Black people visited health centers at a higher rate than White people. Visit characteristics differed by age.

目的:本报告介绍了2023年美国卫生中心访问量的全国估计。对选定的特征提出估计,并按年龄、性别、种族和民族进行比较。方法:根据2023年全国门诊医疗调查卫生中心组成部分计算估计值。数据是从符合联邦要求但不接受联邦资助的联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)和类似医疗中心项目的医疗中心收集的。对数据进行加权,得出美国所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的医疗中心访问量的全国代表性估计。结果:在2023年期间,估计有1.199亿人前往美国的医疗中心,总体比率为每1000人363.2次。女性访视率(450.5)高于男性(272.4)。与非西班牙裔白人(后来是白人)(167.1)、非西班牙裔黑人(后来是黑人)(391.5)和其他种族的非西班牙裔人(192.4)相比,西班牙裔人的访问率最高(767.7)。不同年龄的访视率差异无统计学意义。疾病约占保健中心访问的一半(53.8%),症状和体征占访问的22.0%。检查(12.7%)和筛查(10.2%)也是前往保健中心的常见原因。内分泌疾病是健康中心就诊中最常提到的疾病类别(24.5%),总体而言,在45岁及以上的成年人中也是如此。对于18-44岁的成年人来说,精神健康障碍是最常见的疾病类别(20.3%)。在17岁及以下儿童和青少年的就诊中,呼吸系统疾病(14.8%)和精神健康障碍(12.9%)是最常见的疾病类别。结论:女性访视率高于男性。西班牙裔和黑人去医疗中心的比率高于白人。访问特征因年龄而异。
{"title":"Visits to Health Centers, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2023.","authors":"Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman","doi":"10.15620/cdc/174585","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/174585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report presents national estimates of visits to health centers in the United States in 2023. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics and compared by age, sex, and race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Estimates were calculated from the 2023 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and health center program look-alikes, which meet federal requirements but do not receive federal funding. Data were weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2023, an estimated 119.9 million visits were made to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 363.2 visits per 1,000 people. The visit rate among females (450.5) was higher than for males (272.4). Visit rates were highest for Hispanic people (767.7) compared with White non-Hispanic (subsequently, White) (167.1), Black non-Hispanic (subsequently, Black) (391.5), and non-Hispanic people of other races (192.4). Differences in visit rates by age were not statistically significant. Diseases accounted for about one-half of health center visits (53.8%), and symptoms and signs accounted for 22.0% of visits. Examinations (12.7%) and screenings (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category at health center visits (24.5%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. For visits by adults ages 18-44, mental health disorders represented the most common disease category (20.3%). Among visits by children and adolescents age 17 and younger, respiratory diseases (14.8%) and mental health disorders (12.9%) were the most common disease categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females visited health centers at a higher rate than males. Hispanic and Black people visited health centers at a higher rate than White people. Visit characteristics differed by age.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 216","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951252/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146258710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enrollment in High-deductible Health Plans Among People Younger Than Age 65 With Private Health Insurance: United States, 2019-2023. 65岁以下有私人医疗保险的人参加高免赔额健康计划:美国,2019-2023。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/165797
Robin A Cohen, Elizabeth M Briones

Objective: This report provides a comprehensive look at enrollment in high-deductible health plans (HDHP), including consumer-directed health plans (CDHP) among privately insured people younger than age 65.

Methods: Data from the 2019 through 2023 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine enrollment in HDHPs and CDHPs among people younger than age 65 with private health insurance. CDHPs are HDHPs with an associated health savings account or health reimbursement account. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, family educational attainment, level of urbanization, and source of private coverage.

Results: In 2023, among privately insured people younger than age 65, 41.7% were enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment increased from 40.3% in 2019 to 43.3% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.7% in 2023. Among people with employment-based coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 40.2% in 2019 to 43.4% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.9% in 2023. For people with directly purchased coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 44.3% in 2019 to 47.0% in 2020, followed by a decrease to 43.1% in 2023. Generally, White non-Hispanic people were the most likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people were the least likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment in an HDHP increased with family income and family educational attainment. In 2023, 19.5% of people younger than age 65 with private health insurance were enrolled in a CDHP. Enrollment characteristics of people with CDHPs mirrored those of people with HDHPs overall. However, children were more likely to be enrolled in an CDHP plan than adults ages 18-64. People with employment-based coverage were nearly four times more likely to be enrolled in a CDHP than their counterparts with directly purchased coverage.

目的:本报告提供了一个全面的看登记高免赔额健康计划(HDHP),包括消费者导向的健康计划(CDHP)在私人保险年龄小于65岁的人。方法:使用2019年至2023年全国健康访谈调查的数据,检查65岁以下有私人健康保险的人参加hdhp和cdhp的情况。cdhp是具有相关健康储蓄账户或健康报销账户的hdhp。所有估算均按性别、年龄组、种族和西班牙裔、家庭收入、家庭受教育程度、城市化水平和私人保险来源分列。结果:2023年,在65岁以下的私人保险人群中,41.7%的人参加了HDHP。入学率从2019年的40.3%上升到2021年的43.3%,随后在2023年下降到41.7%。在以就业为基础的保险人群中,HDHP的入学率从2019年的40.2%上升到2021年的43.4%,随后下降到2023年的41.9%。对于直接购买保险的人来说,HDHP的入学率从2019年的44.3%上升到2020年的47.0%,然后在2023年下降到43.1%。一般来说,非西班牙裔白人最有可能参加HDHP。非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人参加HDHP的可能性最小。参加HDHP的人数随着家庭收入和教育程度的增加而增加。2023年,65岁以下拥有私人医疗保险的人中有19.5%参加了CDHP。cdhp患者的入组特征反映了hdhp患者的总体特征。然而,儿童比18-64岁的成年人更有可能参加CDHP计划。拥有以就业为基础的保险的人参加CDHP的可能性几乎是直接购买保险的人的四倍。
{"title":"Enrollment in High-deductible Health Plans Among People Younger Than Age 65 With Private Health Insurance: United States, 2019-2023.","authors":"Robin A Cohen, Elizabeth M Briones","doi":"10.15620/cdc/165797","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/165797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report provides a comprehensive look at enrollment in high-deductible health plans (HDHP), including consumer-directed health plans (CDHP) among privately insured people younger than age 65.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2019 through 2023 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine enrollment in HDHPs and CDHPs among people younger than age 65 with private health insurance. CDHPs are HDHPs with an associated health savings account or health reimbursement account. All estimates are presented by sex, age group, race and Hispanic origin, family income, family educational attainment, level of urbanization, and source of private coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023, among privately insured people younger than age 65, 41.7% were enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment increased from 40.3% in 2019 to 43.3% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.7% in 2023. Among people with employment-based coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 40.2% in 2019 to 43.4% in 2021, followed by a decrease to 41.9% in 2023. For people with directly purchased coverage, enrollment in an HDHP increased from 44.3% in 2019 to 47.0% in 2020, followed by a decrease to 43.1% in 2023. Generally, White non-Hispanic people were the most likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people were the least likely to be enrolled in an HDHP. Enrollment in an HDHP increased with family income and family educational attainment. In 2023, 19.5% of people younger than age 65 with private health insurance were enrolled in a CDHP. Enrollment characteristics of people with CDHPs mirrored those of people with HDHPs overall. However, children were more likely to be enrolled in an CDHP plan than adults ages 18-64. People with employment-based coverage were nearly four times more likely to be enrolled in a CDHP than their counterparts with directly purchased coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 214","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831409/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143408874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics of Older Adults Who Met Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: United States, 2022. 符合美国联邦体育活动指南的老年人的特征:美国,2022。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/166708
Nazik Elgaddal, Ellen A Kramarow

Objective: This report presents national estimates of the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.

Methods: Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2018 Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time. Adults were considered to have met the guidelines if they met both aerobic and muscle-strengthening recommendations. Estimates are presented by age group, sex, race and Hispanic origin, education, family income, urbanization level, respondent-assessed health status, chronic conditions, disability status, severity of depression symptoms, severity of anxiety symptoms, and body mass index.

Results: Overall, 13.9% (age adjusted) of adults age 65 and older met federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities in 2022. Differences were seen by several sociodemographic characteristics. Men (16.9%), White non-Hispanic adults (15.2%), and those living in metropolitan areas (14.7%) were more likely to meet the guidelines. The percentage meeting the federal physical activity guidelines increased with increasing education level and family income and decreased with number of chronic conditions. Older adults who reported poor health status had the lowest percentage meeting the guidelines compared with those reporting good, very good, or excellent health. Older adults without disabilities were three times more likely to meet the federal physical activity guidelines than adults with disabilities (15.9% compared with 5.0%, respectively). Older adults with no depression or anxiety symptoms were more likely to meet the guidelines than those with mild symptoms or moderate or severe symptoms.

目的:本报告根据社会人口学和健康相关特征,对符合联邦体育活动指南的65岁及以上成年人在闲暇时间进行有氧和肌肉强化活动的百分比进行了全国估计。方法:使用2022年全国健康访谈调查的数据来估计符合美国卫生与公众服务部2018年美国人联邦体育活动指南的65岁及以上成年人在闲暇时间进行有氧和肌肉强化活动的百分比。如果成年人同时符合有氧运动和肌肉强化建议,则被认为符合指南。根据年龄组、性别、种族和西班牙裔、教育程度、家庭收入、城市化水平、受访者评估的健康状况、慢性病、残疾状况、抑郁症状的严重程度、焦虑症状的严重程度和体重指数提出了估计数。结果:总体而言,在2022年,13.9%(年龄调整后)65岁及以上的成年人在有氧和肌肉强化活动方面符合联邦体育活动指南。从几个社会人口统计学特征可以看出差异。男性(16.9%)、非西班牙裔白人成年人(15.2%)和居住在大都市地区的人(14.7%)更有可能符合指南。符合联邦体育活动指南的百分比随着教育水平和家庭收入的增加而增加,随着慢性病的增加而减少。报告健康状况不佳的老年人与报告健康状况良好、非常好或非常好的老年人相比,符合指南的比例最低。无残疾的老年人达到联邦体育活动指南的可能性是残疾成年人的三倍(分别为15.9%和5.0%)。没有抑郁或焦虑症状的老年人比那些有轻度症状或中度或重度症状的老年人更有可能符合指南。
{"title":"Characteristics of Older Adults Who Met Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: United States, 2022.","authors":"Nazik Elgaddal, Ellen A Kramarow","doi":"10.15620/cdc/166708","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/166708","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report presents national estimates of the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate the percentage of adults age 65 and older who met the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2018 Federal Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities during leisure time. Adults were considered to have met the guidelines if they met both aerobic and muscle-strengthening recommendations. Estimates are presented by age group, sex, race and Hispanic origin, education, family income, urbanization level, respondent-assessed health status, chronic conditions, disability status, severity of depression symptoms, severity of anxiety symptoms, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 13.9% (age adjusted) of adults age 65 and older met federal physical activity guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities in 2022. Differences were seen by several sociodemographic characteristics. Men (16.9%), White non-Hispanic adults (15.2%), and those living in metropolitan areas (14.7%) were more likely to meet the guidelines. The percentage meeting the federal physical activity guidelines increased with increasing education level and family income and decreased with number of chronic conditions. Older adults who reported poor health status had the lowest percentage meeting the guidelines compared with those reporting good, very good, or excellent health. Older adults without disabilities were three times more likely to meet the federal physical activity guidelines than adults with disabilities (15.9% compared with 5.0%, respectively). Older adults with no depression or anxiety symptoms were more likely to meet the guidelines than those with mild symptoms or moderate or severe symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 215","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142921932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022. 成人焦虑和抑郁症状:美国,2019 年和 2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.15620/cdc/64018
Emily P Terlizzi, Benjamin Zablotsky

Objective: This report examines the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, and how those may have changed between 2019 and 2022.

Methods: Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and symptoms of depression, using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).

Results: During 2022, about one in five adults age 18 and older experienced any symptoms of anxiety (18.2%) or symptoms of depression (21.4%) in the past 2 weeks. The severity of symptoms differed by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics. The percentages of adults with mild, moderate, or severe symptoms of both anxiety and depression were highest among adults ages 18-29 and decreased with age and were higher among women than men. Asian non-Hispanic adults were least likely to experience moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety and depression compared with the other race and Hispanic-origin groups examined. In addition, the percentage of adults with any symptoms of anxiety and depression was highest among those with less than a high school education and with family incomes less than 100% of the federal poverty level and was higher among those living in rural areas. A significant increase was seen in the percentage of adults with anxiety symptoms (from 15.6% to 18.2%, respectively) and depression symptoms (from 18.5% to 21.4%, respectively) between 2019 and 2022. Increases in symptoms of anxiety and depression were seen throughout the subgroups examined, including adults ages 18-44, Black non-Hispanic and White non-Hispanic adults, adults with a high school education or more, and adults with family incomes of 100% of the federal poverty level or higher, as well as adults from all regions and urbanization levels.

目的:本报告研究了按社会人口和地理特征划分的成年人焦虑和抑郁症状的流行率,以及这些特征在 2019 年至 2022 年期间可能发生的变化:本报告研究了按社会人口和地理特征划分的成年人焦虑症和抑郁症状的流行情况,以及这些症状在 2019 年至 2022 年期间可能发生的变化:方法:利用 2022 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,使用广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)研究焦虑症状的流行率,并使用患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-8)研究抑郁症状的流行率:2022 年期间,约五分之一的 18 岁及以上成年人在过去两周内出现过任何焦虑症状(18.2%)或抑郁症状(21.4%)。症状的严重程度因社会人口和地理特征而异。有轻度、中度或重度焦虑和抑郁症状的成年人比例在 18-29 岁的成年人中最高,随着年龄的增长而下降,女性高于男性。与其他种族和西班牙裔群体相比,非西班牙裔亚裔成年人出现中度和重度焦虑和抑郁症状的可能性最小。此外,在高中以下学历、家庭收入低于联邦贫困线 100%的成年人中,出现任何焦虑和抑郁症状的比例最高,而在农村地区的成年人中,这一比例也更高。在 2019 年至 2022 年期间,出现焦虑症状(分别从 15.6% 上升至 18.2%)和抑郁症状(分别从 18.5% 上升至 21.4%)的成年人比例大幅上升。焦虑和抑郁症状的增加出现在所研究的所有亚组中,包括 18-44 岁的成年人、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人成年人、具有高中或高中以上学历的成年人、家庭收入达到联邦贫困线 100%或更高水平的成年人,以及来自所有地区和城市化水平的成年人。
{"title":"Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Adults: United States, 2019 and 2022.","authors":"Emily P Terlizzi, Benjamin Zablotsky","doi":"10.15620/cdc/64018","DOIUrl":"10.15620/cdc/64018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report examines the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression among adults by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, and how those may have changed between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to examine the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and symptoms of depression, using the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, about one in five adults age 18 and older experienced any symptoms of anxiety (18.2%) or symptoms of depression (21.4%) in the past 2 weeks. The severity of symptoms differed by sociodemographic and geographic characteristics. The percentages of adults with mild, moderate, or severe symptoms of both anxiety and depression were highest among adults ages 18-29 and decreased with age and were higher among women than men. Asian non-Hispanic adults were least likely to experience moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety and depression compared with the other race and Hispanic-origin groups examined. In addition, the percentage of adults with any symptoms of anxiety and depression was highest among those with less than a high school education and with family incomes less than 100% of the federal poverty level and was higher among those living in rural areas. A significant increase was seen in the percentage of adults with anxiety symptoms (from 15.6% to 18.2%, respectively) and depression symptoms (from 18.5% to 21.4%, respectively) between 2019 and 2022. Increases in symptoms of anxiety and depression were seen throughout the subgroups examined, including adults ages 18-44, Black non-Hispanic and White non-Hispanic adults, adults with a high school education or more, and adults with family incomes of 100% of the federal poverty level or higher, as well as adults from all regions and urbanization levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 213","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616099/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142730554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022. 按选定特征分列的成年人到保健中心就诊的情况:美国,2022 年。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.15620/CDC/59282
Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman

Objective: This report describes care received at health centers in the United States in 2022. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics.

Methods: The data presented in this report are from the 2022 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers and federally qualified health center look-alikes and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Results: During 2022, an estimated 89.5 million visits were made by adults to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 349.4 visits per 1,000 adults. The visit rate among women was higher than for men. Differences in visit rates by age were not significant. Adults who were not married accounted for 48.2% of visits, and adults who were married accounted for 37.6% of visits. More than one-half of health center visits were disease-related (61.4%). Symptoms-related diagnoses accounted for 22.0% of visits. Screenings (12.6%) and examinations (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Social determinants of health were listed as a reason for the visit at 2.0% of health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category (29.1%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. Mental disorders represented the most common disease category among adults ages 18-44.

Conclusions: Women visited health centers at a higher rate than men. In addition, patient and visit characteristics, including marital status and diagnoses, differed by age.

目的:本报告介绍了 2022 年美国医疗中心提供的医疗服务。方法:本报告中的数据来自 2022 年全国非住院医疗护理调查健康中心部分。数据收集自联邦合格医疗中心和联邦合格医疗中心类似机构,并经过加权处理,得出具有全国代表性的美国 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区医疗中心就诊人次估计数:2022 年期间,美国成年人到保健中心就诊的人次估计为 8950 万,每 1000 名成年人中就诊的总人次为 349.4。女性的就诊率高于男性。不同年龄段的就诊率差异不大。未婚成年人占就诊人数的 48.2%,已婚成年人占就诊人数的 37.6%。超过一半的健康中心就诊是与疾病相关的(61.4%)。与症状相关的诊断占就诊人数的 22.0%。筛查(12.6%)和检查(10.2%)也是保健中心就诊的常见原因。有 2.0% 的健康中心就诊者将健康的社会决定因素列为就诊原因。内分泌疾病是最常被提及的疾病类别(29.1%),无论是在总体上还是在 45 岁及以上的成年人中。精神障碍是 18-44 岁成年人中最常见的疾病类别:结论:女性到保健中心就诊的比例高于男性。此外,患者和就诊者的特征,包括婚姻状况和诊断,因年龄而异。
{"title":"Visits to Health Centers Among Adults, by Selected Characteristics: United States, 2022.","authors":"Loredana Santo, Zachary J Peters, Lello Guluma, Jill J Ashman","doi":"10.15620/CDC/59282","DOIUrl":"10.15620/CDC/59282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report describes care received at health centers in the United States in 2022. Estimates are presented for selected characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data presented in this report are from the 2022 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Health Center Component. Data were collected from federally qualified health centers and federally qualified health center look-alikes and weighted to produce nationally representative estimates of visits to health centers from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2022, an estimated 89.5 million visits were made by adults to health centers in the United States, an overall rate of 349.4 visits per 1,000 adults. The visit rate among women was higher than for men. Differences in visit rates by age were not significant. Adults who were not married accounted for 48.2% of visits, and adults who were married accounted for 37.6% of visits. More than one-half of health center visits were disease-related (61.4%). Symptoms-related diagnoses accounted for 22.0% of visits. Screenings (12.6%) and examinations (10.2%) were also frequent reasons for health center visits. Social determinants of health were listed as a reason for the visit at 2.0% of health center visits. Endocrine diseases represented the most frequently mentioned disease category (29.1%), overall and among adults age 45 and older. Mental disorders represented the most common disease category among adults ages 18-44.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women visited health centers at a higher rate than men. In addition, patient and visit characteristics, including marital status and diagnoses, differed by age.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 211","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586816/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142564725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Work Conditions and Family Food Insecurity Among Adults Ages 18-64: United States, 2021. 18-64岁成年人的工作条件和家庭粮食不安全:美国,2021。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-17
Laryssa Mykyta, Julie D Weeks

Objective: This report describes differences in the experience of family food insecurity in the past 30 days among working adults ages 18-64 by selected work conditions.

Methods: Using data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on working adults ages 18-64, family food insecurity in the past 30 days was examined by selected work conditions, including type of work shift, work schedule inflexibilities, advance notice of work schedule, and monthly change in earnings. Bivariate associations between family food insecurity and each type of work condition were examined, and logistic regression models were used to estimate associations adjusting for age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, nativity status, marital status, presence of children in family, educational attainment, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, employed full time, occupation, health status, disability status, rural residence, and region. Model-adjusted prevalence of family food insecurity among working adults by type of work conditions is reported.

Results: In 2021, 4.4% of working adults ages 18-64 lived in families experiencing food insecurity. Differences in family food insecurity by work conditions persisted even after adjusting for potential confounders. After adjustment, those working rotating or other types of shifts were more likely to report family food insecurity (5.7%) compared with day shift workers (4.0%). Workers who reported that it was very difficult or somewhat difficult to change their work schedule were more likely to experience family food insecurity (6.3%) than workers who reported it was very easy or somewhat easy to change their work schedule (3.8%). Food insecurity also varied by monthly change in earnings, from 3.9% among workers whose earnings did not change to 5.5% among workers whose earnings changed at least a moderate amount from month to month.

目的:本报告描述了在选定的工作条件下,过去30天内18-64岁在职成年人的家庭粮食不安全体验的差异。方法:利用2021年全国18-64岁在职成年人健康访谈调查的数据,通过选定的工作条件,包括工作班次类型、工作时间表不灵活性、工作时间表提前通知和每月收入变化,检查过去30天的家庭粮食不安全状况。研究了家庭食品不安全与每种工作条件之间的双变量关联,并使用logistic回归模型来估计调整年龄、性别、种族和西班牙裔、出生状况、婚姻状况、家庭中是否有孩子、受教育程度、家庭收入占联邦贫困水平的百分比、全职工作、职业、健康状况、残疾状况、农村居住和地区的关联。报告了按工作条件类型调整的工作成年人中家庭粮食不安全的流行程度。结果:2021年,4.4%的18-64岁在职成年人生活在粮食不安全的家庭中。即使在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,工作条件在家庭食品不安全方面的差异仍然存在。调整后,与白班工人(4.0%)相比,轮班或其他类型轮班的工人更有可能报告家庭食品不安全(5.7%)。报告改变工作时间表非常困难或有些困难的工人比报告改变工作时间表非常容易或有些容易的工人(3.8%)更有可能经历家庭粮食不安全(6.3%)。粮食不安全也因每月收入变化而异,从收入没有变化的工人的3.9%到收入每月至少有适度变化的工人的5.5%。
{"title":"Work Conditions and Family Food Insecurity Among Adults Ages 18-64: United States, 2021.","authors":"Laryssa Mykyta, Julie D Weeks","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report describes differences in the experience of family food insecurity in the past 30 days among working adults ages 18-64 by selected work conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey on working adults ages 18-64, family food insecurity in the past 30 days was examined by selected work conditions, including type of work shift, work schedule inflexibilities, advance notice of work schedule, and monthly change in earnings. Bivariate associations between family food insecurity and each type of work condition were examined, and logistic regression models were used to estimate associations adjusting for age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, nativity status, marital status, presence of children in family, educational attainment, family income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, employed full time, occupation, health status, disability status, rural residence, and region. Model-adjusted prevalence of family food insecurity among working adults by type of work conditions is reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021, 4.4% of working adults ages 18-64 lived in families experiencing food insecurity. Differences in family food insecurity by work conditions persisted even after adjusting for potential confounders. After adjustment, those working rotating or other types of shifts were more likely to report family food insecurity (5.7%) compared with day shift workers (4.0%). Workers who reported that it was very difficult or somewhat difficult to change their work schedule were more likely to experience family food insecurity (6.3%) than workers who reported it was very easy or somewhat easy to change their work schedule (3.8%). Food insecurity also varied by monthly change in earnings, from 3.9% among workers whose earnings did not change to 5.5% among workers whose earnings changed at least a moderate amount from month to month.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 212","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
National health statistics reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1