Effect of Self-Controlled and Regulated Feedback on Motor Skill Performance and Learning: A Meta-Analytic Study.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-05 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2020.1782825
Judith Jimenez-Diaz, Karla Chaves-Castro, Maria Morera-Castro
{"title":"Effect of Self-Controlled and Regulated Feedback on Motor Skill Performance and Learning: A Meta-Analytic Study.","authors":"Judith Jimenez-Diaz,&nbsp;Karla Chaves-Castro,&nbsp;Maria Morera-Castro","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2020.1782825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to use the meta-analytic approach to assess the effectiveness of self-controlled (SC) and regulated (R) feedback on motor skill performance (MSP). Random effects model using the standardized mean difference effect size (<i>ES</i>) was used to pool results. A total of 86 <i>ES</i>, retrieved from 18 studies, were calculated and separated into three types of feedback: SC, R, and yoked group (YG). In acquisition phase, SC (<i>ES</i> = 1.872; <i>CI<sub>95%</sub></i> = 1.014, 2.730), R (<i>ES</i> = 0.852; <i>CI<sub>95%</sub></i> = 0.614, 1.090), and YG (<i>ES</i> = 1.492; <i>CI<sub>95%</sub></i> = 0.266, 2.718) significantly improved MSP. In retention phase, SC and YG had a nonsignificant decrease in MSP, R (<i>ES</i> = -0.819; <i>CI<sub>95%</sub></i> = -1.207, -0.430) significantly decrease MSP. Several factors were analyzed as moderator variables. Results suggest that SC feedback enhances learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":"53 3","pages":"385-398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00222895.2020.1782825","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2020.1782825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use the meta-analytic approach to assess the effectiveness of self-controlled (SC) and regulated (R) feedback on motor skill performance (MSP). Random effects model using the standardized mean difference effect size (ES) was used to pool results. A total of 86 ES, retrieved from 18 studies, were calculated and separated into three types of feedback: SC, R, and yoked group (YG). In acquisition phase, SC (ES = 1.872; CI95% = 1.014, 2.730), R (ES = 0.852; CI95% = 0.614, 1.090), and YG (ES = 1.492; CI95% = 0.266, 2.718) significantly improved MSP. In retention phase, SC and YG had a nonsignificant decrease in MSP, R (ES = -0.819; CI95% = -1.207, -0.430) significantly decrease MSP. Several factors were analyzed as moderator variables. Results suggest that SC feedback enhances learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我控制和调节反馈对运动技能表现和学习的影响:一项元分析研究。
本研究旨在运用元分析方法评估自我控制反馈和调节反馈对运动技能表现(MSP)的影响。采用标准平均差异效应大小(ES)的随机效应模型对结果进行汇总。从18项研究中检索到86个ES,并将其分为三种反馈类型:SC、R和YG组。在获取阶段,SC (ES = 1.872;Ci95% = 1.014, 2.730), r (es = 0.852;CI95% = 0.614, 1.090), YG (ES = 1.492;CI95% = 0.266, 2.718)显著提高了MSP。在保留期,SC和YG的MSP均无显著降低,R (ES = -0.819;CI95% = -1.207, -0.430)显著降低MSP。分析了几个因素作为调节变量。结果表明SC反馈对学习有促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Entrainment of Finger Tapping and Auditory Stimuli in Humans. Age-Related Differences in the One Target Advantage: Exploring the Impact of Augmented Sensory Feedback. Cross-Sectional Association of Spatial Cognition with Static and Dynamic Balance in Healthy Young Adults. Comparison of Motor Learning Effects with a Different Focus of Attention on Movement Form Acquisition. Investigation of Alpha Band Activity in Self-Paced and Externally-Paced Tasks: A Fitts and Posner Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1