Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-06-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1302898
Takashi Kondo, Hiromichi Izumi, Makiko Kitagawa
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device.","authors":"Takashi Kondo,&nbsp;Hiromichi Izumi,&nbsp;Makiko Kitagawa","doi":"10.1155/2020/1302898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (-0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. -0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, <i>P</i>=0.005 and <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and -0.3 ± 3.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>P</i>=0.002 and <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"1302898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/1302898","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1302898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil.

Methods: Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups.

Results: Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (-0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. -0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, P=0.005 and P < 0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH2O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH2O and -0.3 ± 3.6 cmH2O, P=0.002 and P < 0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol.

Conclusions: Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地氟醚、七氟醚和异丙酚在瑞芬太尼全麻中使用声门上气道装置对声门开口面积影响的比较
目的:本研究的目的是比较地氟醚、七氟醚和异丙酚对瑞芬太尼全身麻醉时声门开口面积的影响。方法:选取90例全麻下行手上肢手术联合臂丛神经阻滞的患者进行研究。患者随机分为三组,分别接受地氟醚(D组)、七氟醚(S组)和异丙酚(P组)维持麻醉。瑞芬太尼全麻诱导后,在建立机械通气后,通过i-gel™声门上装置开始声门周围的连续光纤视频记录。录像开始后给予地氟醚、七氟醚或异丙酚。比较三组患者手术过程中标准化声门开口面积(n-GOA)和吸气峰值压力(PIP)的变化。结果:D组术中n-GOA变化与S组、P组比较差异有统计学意义(-0.0656±0.0772 vs. -0.0076±0.0499和+0.0269±0.0809,P=0.005和P < 0.0001)。与S组和P组比较,D组PIP变化有显著性差异(+3.7±3.4 cmH2O vs +1.0±1.3 cmH2O和-0.3±3.6 cmH2O, P=0.002和P < 0.0001)。D组4例复发性声门狭窄患者经地氟醚改异丙酚治疗后改善。结论:与七氟醚和异丙酚相比,地氟醚在瑞芬太尼全身麻醉时缩小了n-GOA,增加了PIP。临床医生应注意地氟醚-瑞芬太尼麻醉期间,当气道由声门上气道装置固定而不使用神经肌肉阻滞时,可能出现声门狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Remimazolam on the Baseline TOF Ratio: A Prospective, Clinical Study. Efficacy of High-Volume Low-Concentration Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Irrigation for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Bupivacaine Irrigation for Analgesia. Association Between MRI Findings of Facet Arthropathy and Synovitis With Health-Related Outcome and Pain Scores Following Therapeutic Lumbar Facet Injections. Use of a Nasal Cannula as a Preoxygenation Adjunct: A Randomized Crossover Study. Weight-Based Standardized Sugammadex Dosing in Pediatrics: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Compliance with Dosing Guidelines and Reduce Waste and Cost.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1