Co-occurrence patterns and the large-scale spatial structure of benthic communities in seagrass meadows and bare sand.

IF 2.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences BMC Ecology Pub Date : 2020-07-08 DOI:10.1186/s12898-020-00308-4
Casper Kraan, Simon F Thrush, Carsten F Dormann
{"title":"Co-occurrence patterns and the large-scale spatial structure of benthic communities in seagrass meadows and bare sand.","authors":"Casper Kraan,&nbsp;Simon F Thrush,&nbsp;Carsten F Dormann","doi":"10.1186/s12898-020-00308-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Species distribution models are commonly used tools to describe diversity patterns and support conservation measures. There is a wide range of approaches to developing SDMs, each highlighting different characteristics of both the data and the ecology of the species or assemblages represented by the data. Yet, signals of species co-occurrences in community data are usually ignored, due to the assumption that such structuring roles of species co-occurrences are limited to small spatial scales and require experimental studies to be detected. Here, our aim is to explore associations among marine sandy-bottom sediment inhabitants and test for the structuring effect of seagrass on co-occurrences among these species across a New Zealand intertidal sandflat, using a joint species distribution model (JSDM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We ran a JSDM on a total of 27 macrobenthic species co-occurring in 300,000 m<sup>2</sup> of sandflat. These species represented all major taxonomic groups, i.e. polychaetes, bivalves and crustaceans, collected in 400 sampling locations. A number of significant co-occurrences due to shared habitat preferences were present in vegetated areas, where negative and positive correlations were approximately equally common. A few species, among them the gastropods Cominella glandiformis and Notoacmea scapha, co-occurred randomly with other seagrass benthic inhabitants. Residual correlations were less apparent and mostly positive. In bare sand flats shared habitat preferences resulted in many significant co-occurrences of benthic species. Moreover, many negative and positive residual patterns between benthic species remained after accounting for habitat preferences. Some species occurring in both habitats showed similarities in their correlations, such as the polychaete Aglaophamus macroura, which shared habitat preferences with many other benthic species in both habitats, yet no residual correlations remained in either habitat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Firstly, analyses based on a latent variable approach to joint distributions stressed the structuring role of species co-occurrences beyond experimental scales. Secondly, results showed context dependent interactions, highlighted by species having more interconnected networks in New Zealand bare sediment sandflats than in seagrass meadows. These findings stress the critical importance of natural history to modelling, as well as incorporating ecological reality in SDMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9232,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12898-020-00308-4","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00308-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Species distribution models are commonly used tools to describe diversity patterns and support conservation measures. There is a wide range of approaches to developing SDMs, each highlighting different characteristics of both the data and the ecology of the species or assemblages represented by the data. Yet, signals of species co-occurrences in community data are usually ignored, due to the assumption that such structuring roles of species co-occurrences are limited to small spatial scales and require experimental studies to be detected. Here, our aim is to explore associations among marine sandy-bottom sediment inhabitants and test for the structuring effect of seagrass on co-occurrences among these species across a New Zealand intertidal sandflat, using a joint species distribution model (JSDM).

Results: We ran a JSDM on a total of 27 macrobenthic species co-occurring in 300,000 m2 of sandflat. These species represented all major taxonomic groups, i.e. polychaetes, bivalves and crustaceans, collected in 400 sampling locations. A number of significant co-occurrences due to shared habitat preferences were present in vegetated areas, where negative and positive correlations were approximately equally common. A few species, among them the gastropods Cominella glandiformis and Notoacmea scapha, co-occurred randomly with other seagrass benthic inhabitants. Residual correlations were less apparent and mostly positive. In bare sand flats shared habitat preferences resulted in many significant co-occurrences of benthic species. Moreover, many negative and positive residual patterns between benthic species remained after accounting for habitat preferences. Some species occurring in both habitats showed similarities in their correlations, such as the polychaete Aglaophamus macroura, which shared habitat preferences with many other benthic species in both habitats, yet no residual correlations remained in either habitat.

Conclusions: Firstly, analyses based on a latent variable approach to joint distributions stressed the structuring role of species co-occurrences beyond experimental scales. Secondly, results showed context dependent interactions, highlighted by species having more interconnected networks in New Zealand bare sediment sandflats than in seagrass meadows. These findings stress the critical importance of natural history to modelling, as well as incorporating ecological reality in SDMs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海草草甸与裸沙底栖生物群落共现模式及大尺度空间结构
背景:物种分布模型是描述多样性格局和支持保护措施的常用工具。开发sdm的方法有很多种,每种方法都强调数据和数据所代表的物种或组合的生态的不同特征。然而,群落数据中物种共现的信号通常被忽略,因为假设物种共现的这种结构作用仅限于小空间尺度,需要实验研究来检测。在这里,我们的目的是探索海洋砂底沉积物居民之间的联系,并使用联合物种分布模型(JSDM)测试海草对新西兰潮间带滩地上这些物种共同出现的结构效应。结果:对30万m2沙地共发生的27种大型底栖动物进行了JSDM分析。这些物种代表了400个采样点收集的所有主要分类类群,即多毛类、双壳类和甲壳类。由于共同的生境偏好,在有植被的地区出现了一些重要的共同现象,其中负相关和正相关几乎同样常见。其中腹足类Cominella glandiformis和Notoacmea scapha与其他海草底栖生物随机共存。残差相关性不太明显,多数为正相关。在裸沙滩地,共有的生境偏好导致了许多重要的底栖物种共同出现。此外,在考虑栖息地偏好后,底栖生物物种之间仍然存在许多负性和正性残留模式。在两个栖息地中出现的一些物种在它们的相关性上表现出相似性,如多毛类Aglaophamus macroa,它们与两个栖息地中的许多其他底栖动物有着共同的栖息地偏好,但在两个栖息地中都没有残留的相关性。结论:首先,基于潜在变量方法的联合分布分析强调了物种共现在实验尺度之外的结构作用。其次,研究结果显示了环境依赖的相互作用,新西兰裸沙滩地的物种比海草草甸的物种拥有更多的相互联系网络。这些发现强调了自然历史对建模的重要性,以及在sdm中纳入生态现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ecology
BMC Ecology ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ecology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on environmental, behavioral and population ecology as well as biodiversity of plants, animals and microbes.
期刊最新文献
Hydrology influences breeding time in the white-throated dipper. Effects of habitat edges on vegetation structure and the vulnerable golden-brown mouse lemur (Microcebus ravelobensis) in northwestern Madagascar. Invasive raccoon management systems and challenges in regions with active control. Effects of tree species and topography on soil and microbial biomass stoichiometry in Funiu Mountain, China. Bioclimatic zonation and potential distribution of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Kivu Province, DR Congo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1