Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Case Reports in Oncological Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-25 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/4392562
Caitlyn N Myrdal, Srinath Sundararajan
{"title":"Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy.","authors":"Caitlyn N Myrdal, Srinath Sundararajan","doi":"10.1155/2020/4392562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAF<sup>V600</sup>-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the potential for long-term response but displays a lower rate of objective response. The benefit of synergy between therapies is apparent; however, there is limited data regarding optimal sequencing in the treatment of advanced melanoma. We present the case of a 62-year-old gentleman with advanced BRAF<sup>V600</sup>-mutated melanoma who followed an unconventional treatment path. After progressing on single-agent vemurafenib, he had response to multiple modalities of immunotherapy before progression. After, he had a substantial response to multiple BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenges before developing resistance. The patient is now stable after a retrial of combination immunotherapy. Our case illustrates that with the right sequencing of therapy, meaningful clinical responses can be elicited with rechallenging of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9636,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Oncological Medicine","volume":"2020 ","pages":"4392562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7334770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Oncological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4392562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the potential for long-term response but displays a lower rate of objective response. The benefit of synergy between therapies is apparent; however, there is limited data regarding optimal sequencing in the treatment of advanced melanoma. We present the case of a 62-year-old gentleman with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma who followed an unconventional treatment path. After progressing on single-agent vemurafenib, he had response to multiple modalities of immunotherapy before progression. After, he had a substantial response to multiple BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenges before developing resistance. The patient is now stable after a retrial of combination immunotherapy. Our case illustrates that with the right sequencing of therapy, meaningful clinical responses can be elicited with rechallenging of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曾接受 BRAF 靶向疗法和免疫疗法治疗的晚期转移性黑色素瘤患者对伊匹单抗/尼伐单抗再挑战和 BRAF 抑制剂/MEK 抑制剂再挑战的反应。
在治疗 BRAFV600 突变的转移性黑色素瘤患者时,人们对靶向疗法和免疫疗法的最佳排序知之甚少。BRAF/MEK抑制剂通常具有疾病快速消退的优点,但长期使用会经常出现耐药性。使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗有可能获得长期应答,但客观应答率较低。各种疗法之间协同作用的益处显而易见;然而,有关晚期黑色素瘤治疗最佳排序的数据却很有限。我们介绍了一例 62 岁的晚期 BRAFV600 突变黑色素瘤患者,他采用了一种非常规的治疗方法。在单药维莫非尼治疗取得进展后,他对多种方式的免疫疗法均有反应。之后,他又对多种 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂再挑战产生了实质性反应,然后出现了耐药性。在重新接受联合免疫治疗后,患者目前病情稳定。我们的病例说明,如果治疗顺序安排得当,转移性黑色素瘤患者重新接受靶向治疗和免疫治疗后可以产生有意义的临床反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Case Reports in Oncological Medicine is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes case reports and case series related to breast cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, skin cancer, head and neck cancer, paediatric oncology, neurooncology as well as genitourinary cancer.
期刊最新文献
Atypical Femur Fracture in a Teenager on Chronic Imatinib Therapy. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) Following Immune Checkpoint Therapy (ICT). Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma at the Site of 5 Years of Recurrent Paronychia: Case Report and Literature Review. New Germline TP53 Variant Detected After Radiotherapy-Induced Angiosarcoma of the Chest Wall in a Previously Treated Breast Cancer Patient: A Case Report and Review of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome and Radiotherapy-Induced Sarcoma. Sarcoidosis-Like Reaction in Melanoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1