Performance of a measure to assess distress in bipolar disorder

Ana Pascual-Sánchez , Cristina Jenaro , José Manuel Montes
{"title":"Performance of a measure to assess distress in bipolar disorder","authors":"Ana Pascual-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Cristina Jenaro ,&nbsp;José Manuel Montes","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Bipolar disorder is a condition that causes distress even for euthymic patients, having an impact on functional capabilities and </span>quality of life<span>. Personal and social variables are potential sources of distress. Yet, there is a lack of measures to identify specific distress in bipolar disorder. This study describes the development and evaluation of a brief measure for assessing distress in patients with bipolar disorder. We also identify associations with related constructs such as functioning, stigma, and personal beliefs regarding mental illness.</span></p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>We used a sample of 101 euthymic bipolar outpatients. Psychological assessment consisted of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the </span>Hamilton Depression Scale<span> (HAM-D) to establish euthymia. Distress was assessed with Distress on Bipolar Patients-Short (DISBIP-S); associated variables were assessed with the Functioning Assessment Short Scale (FAST), the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI), and the Personal Beliefs about Illness Questionnaire (PBIQ).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The DISBIP-S has strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.90), and medium-high correlation coefficients with the time since last relapse (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.401), predominant polarity (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.309), HDRS (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.644), FAST (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.453), ISMI (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.789), and PBIQ (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.796). Taken together, the scores on the ISMI, and PBIQ and the time since last relapse together explain 69.2% of the variability in distress.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The DISBIP-S can be used as a first step to develop interventions aimed at dealing with problematic personal beliefs and interpersonal sources of distress. Reducing distress experienced by bipolar disorder patients could help improve their quality of life and daily functioning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989120300653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Bipolar disorder is a condition that causes distress even for euthymic patients, having an impact on functional capabilities and quality of life. Personal and social variables are potential sources of distress. Yet, there is a lack of measures to identify specific distress in bipolar disorder. This study describes the development and evaluation of a brief measure for assessing distress in patients with bipolar disorder. We also identify associations with related constructs such as functioning, stigma, and personal beliefs regarding mental illness.

Material and methods

We used a sample of 101 euthymic bipolar outpatients. Psychological assessment consisted of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) to establish euthymia. Distress was assessed with Distress on Bipolar Patients-Short (DISBIP-S); associated variables were assessed with the Functioning Assessment Short Scale (FAST), the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI), and the Personal Beliefs about Illness Questionnaire (PBIQ).

Results

The DISBIP-S has strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90), and medium-high correlation coefficients with the time since last relapse (r = −0.401), predominant polarity (r = 0.309), HDRS (r = −0.644), FAST (r = 0.453), ISMI (r = 0.789), and PBIQ (r = −0.796). Taken together, the scores on the ISMI, and PBIQ and the time since last relapse together explain 69.2% of the variability in distress.

Conclusions

The DISBIP-S can be used as a first step to develop interventions aimed at dealing with problematic personal beliefs and interpersonal sources of distress. Reducing distress experienced by bipolar disorder patients could help improve their quality of life and daily functioning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评估双相情感障碍患者痛苦的方法
双相情感障碍是一种甚至对健康患者也会造成痛苦的疾病,对功能能力和生活质量产生影响。个人和社会变量是痛苦的潜在来源。然而,目前还缺乏确定双相情感障碍中具体痛苦的措施。本研究描述了一种评估双相情感障碍患者痛苦的简短措施的发展和评估。我们还确定了与相关结构的关联,如关于精神疾病的功能、耻辱和个人信仰。材料与方法我们选取101例常郁双相门诊患者作为样本。心理评估采用青年躁狂症评定量表(YMRS)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)建立心境。采用双相患者抑郁量表(DISBIP-S)评估抑郁;相关变量采用功能评估短量表(FAST)、精神疾病内化污名(ISMI)和疾病个人信念问卷(PBIQ)进行评估。结果DISBIP-S具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90),与复发时间(r = - 0.401)、优势极性(r = 0.309)、HDRS (r = - 0.644)、FAST (r = 0.453)、ISMI (r = 0.789)、PBIQ (r = - 0.796)呈中高相关。综合起来,ISMI和PBIQ的分数以及上次复发的时间一起解释了69.2%的痛苦变化。结论DISBIP-S可以作为制定干预措施的第一步,旨在处理有问题的个人信仰和人际关系中的痛苦来源。减少双相情感障碍患者的痛苦可以帮助改善他们的生活质量和日常功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate change and mental health: The urgent warning of Brazil and Spain's 2024 catastrophic floods. Prediction of pharmacological response in OCD using machine learning techniques and clinical and neuropsychological variables. Luis Martín-Santos: A multidimensional psychiatrist. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder Validation study of the Spanish brief version of TEMPS-A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1