Efficacy of laparoscopic gastric bypass vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treating obesity combined with type-2 diabetes.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-24 DOI:10.1080/09674845.2020.1798578
Y Yan, F Wang, H Chen, X Zhao, D Yin, Y Hui, N Ma, C Yang, Z Zheng, T Zhang, N Xu, G Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of laparoscopic gastric bypass <i>vs</i> laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treating obesity combined with type-2 diabetes.","authors":"Y Yan,&nbsp;F Wang,&nbsp;H Chen,&nbsp;X Zhao,&nbsp;D Yin,&nbsp;Y Hui,&nbsp;N Ma,&nbsp;C Yang,&nbsp;Z Zheng,&nbsp;T Zhang,&nbsp;N Xu,&nbsp;G Wang","doi":"10.1080/09674845.2020.1798578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study compared the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treating overweight and obese patients with BMI>28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and type-2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized into a gastric bypass group (n = 77) or a gastrectomy group (n = 80). The surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time, and hospitalization time were collected. BMI, waistline, hipline, C-peptide level, insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and their blood and lipid profile were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgery time and blood loss were significantly higher in the gastrectomy group, when compared to the gastric bypass group (<i>P </i>< 0.05). In both groups, the levels of BMI, waist circumference and hip circumference (but not their ratio) gradually and significantly decreased after surgery compared with baseline (<i>P </i>< 0.05), and no significant difference was found between these two groups. The C-peptide level, HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin gradually and significantly decreased after surgery compared with the values before treatment (<i>P </i>< 0.05). The levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 were also lower after surgery in both groups, while HDL and glucagon-like peptide-1 were significantly higher after surgery compared with the values before treatment (<i>P </i>< 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between these two groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improved the BMI and diabetic conditions of overweight/obese diabetics, while laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy had a shorter surgical time and less blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"78 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09674845.2020.1798578","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2020.1798578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: This prospective study compared the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in treating overweight and obese patients with BMI>28 kg/m2 and type-2 diabetes.

Methods: Patients were randomized into a gastric bypass group (n = 77) or a gastrectomy group (n = 80). The surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time, and hospitalization time were collected. BMI, waistline, hipline, C-peptide level, insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and their blood and lipid profile were also measured.

Results: Surgery time and blood loss were significantly higher in the gastrectomy group, when compared to the gastric bypass group (< 0.05). In both groups, the levels of BMI, waist circumference and hip circumference (but not their ratio) gradually and significantly decreased after surgery compared with baseline (< 0.05), and no significant difference was found between these two groups. The C-peptide level, HOMA-IR, fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin gradually and significantly decreased after surgery compared with the values before treatment (< 0.05). The levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 were also lower after surgery in both groups, while HDL and glucagon-like peptide-1 were significantly higher after surgery compared with the values before treatment (< 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between these two groups of patients.

Conclusion: Both laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improved the BMI and diabetic conditions of overweight/obese diabetics, while laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy had a shorter surgical time and less blood loss.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖式胃切除术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病的疗效比较。
目的:本前瞻性研究比较腹腔镜胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖式胃切除术治疗体重指数>28 kg/m2的超重肥胖2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性。方法:患者随机分为胃旁路组(n = 77)和胃切除术组(n = 80)。收集手术时间、术中出血量、恢复时间、住院时间。同时测量BMI、腰围、臀线、c肽水平、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)以及血脂。结果:胃切除术组的手术时间和出血量明显高于胃旁路组(P P P P P结论:腹腔镜胃旁路和腹腔镜袖式胃切除术均可改善超重/肥胖糖尿病患者的BMI和糖尿病病情,而腹腔镜袖式胃切除术的手术时间更短,出血量更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop® and DOAC-Remove® on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing. Improving Biomedical Science Literacy and Patient-Directed Knowledge of Tuberculosis (TB): A Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study Examining Readability of Patient-Facing TB Information. Mesoporous Silica Microparticle-Protein Complexes: Effects of Protein Size and Solvent Properties on Diffusion and Loading Efficiency. Neuronal Vulnerability of the Entorhinal Cortex to Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease. Evaluating Lung Changes in Long COVID: Ultra-Low-Dose vs. Standard-Dose CT Chest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1