Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes 
of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity
.

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/jfoucher
Jack R Foucher, Micha Gawlik, Julian N Roth, Clément de Crespin de Billy, Ludovic C Jeanjean, Alexandre Obrecht, Olivier Mainberger, Julie M E Clauss, Julien Elowe, Sébastien Weibel, Benoit Schorr, Marcelo Cetkovich, Carlos Morra, Federico Rebok, Thomas A Ban, Barbara Bollmann, Mathilde M Roser, Markus S Hanke, Burkhard E Jabs, Ernst J Franzek, Fabrice Berna, Bruno Pfuhlmann
{"title":"Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes \u2028of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity\u2029.","authors":"Jack R Foucher, Micha Gawlik, Julian N Roth, Clément de Crespin de Billy, Ludovic C Jeanjean, Alexandre Obrecht, Olivier Mainberger, Julie M E Clauss, Julien Elowe, Sébastien Weibel, Benoit Schorr, Marcelo Cetkovich, Carlos Morra, Federico Rebok, Thomas A Ban, Barbara Bollmann, Mathilde M Roser, Markus S Hanke, Burkhard E Jabs, Ernst J Franzek, Fabrice Berna, Bruno Pfuhlmann","doi":"10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/jfoucher","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the ICD-DSM paradigm has been a major advance in clinical psychiatry, its usefulness for biological psychiatry is debated. By defining consensus-based disorders rather than empirically driven phenotypes, consensus classifications were not an implementation of the biomedical paradigm. In the field of endogenous psychoses, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL) pathway has optimized the descriptions of 35 major phenotypes using common medical heuristics on lifelong diachronic observations. Regarding their construct validity, WKL phenotypes have good reliability and predictive and face validity. WKL phenotypes come with remarkable evidence for differential validity on age of onset, familiality, pregnancy complications, precipitating factors, and treatment response. Most impressive is the replicated separation of high- and low-familiality phenotypes. Created in the purest tradition of the biomedical paradigm, the WKL phenotypes deserve to be contrasted as credible alternatives with other approaches currently under discussion.\u2029.</p>","PeriodicalId":54343,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/52/DialoguesClinNeurosci-22-37.PMC7365293.pdf","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/jfoucher","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

While the ICD-DSM paradigm has been a major advance in clinical psychiatry, its usefulness for biological psychiatry is debated. By defining consensus-based disorders rather than empirically driven phenotypes, consensus classifications were not an implementation of the biomedical paradigm. In the field of endogenous psychoses, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL) pathway has optimized the descriptions of 35 major phenotypes using common medical heuristics on lifelong diachronic observations. Regarding their construct validity, WKL phenotypes have good reliability and predictive and face validity. WKL phenotypes come with remarkable evidence for differential validity on age of onset, familiality, pregnancy complications, precipitating factors, and treatment response. Most impressive is the replicated separation of high- and low-familiality phenotypes. Created in the purest tradition of the biomedical paradigm, the WKL phenotypes deserve to be contrasted as credible alternatives with other approaches currently under discussion.
.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内源性精神病的wernickke - kleist - leonhard表型
:对其有效性的回顾
。
虽然ICD-DSM范式在临床精神病学方面取得了重大进展,但它对生物精神病学的有用性仍存在争议。通过定义基于共识的疾病而不是经验驱动的表型,共识分类不是生物医学范式的实施。在内源性精神病领域,Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL)途径利用终身历时观察的常见医学启发式优化了35种主要表型的描述。在结构效度方面,WKL表型具有较好的信度、预测效度和面效度。WKL表型在发病年龄、熟悉程度、妊娠并发症、诱发因素和治疗反应方面具有显著的差异效度证据。最令人印象深刻的是高熟悉型和低熟悉型的重复分离。在最纯粹的生物医学范式传统中创建的WKL表型值得与目前正在讨论的其他方法作为可靠的替代方案进行对比。
。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (DCNS) endeavors to bridge the gap between clinical neuropsychiatry and the neurosciences by offering state-of-the-art information and original insights into pertinent clinical, biological, and therapeutic aspects. As an open access journal, DCNS ensures accessibility to its content for all interested parties. Each issue is curated to include expert reviews, original articles, and brief reports, carefully selected to offer a comprehensive understanding of the evolving landscape in clinical neuroscience. Join us in advancing knowledge and fostering dialogue in this dynamic field.
期刊最新文献
A global neuronal workspace model of functional neurological disorders. Microcephaly type 22 and autism spectrum disorder: A case report and review of literature. The impact of testosterone-lowering medication on recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual offenses. Predictive values of pre-treatment brain age models to rTMS effects in neurocognitive disorder with depression: Secondary analysis of a randomised sham-controlled clinical trial. Should dietary restrictions be imposed on Alzheimer's Disease patients affected by type 2 diabetes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1