Chest Wall Trauma Surgery Review.

Rita Barata, Cristina Rodrigues, Ana Rita Costa, Daniel Cabral
{"title":"Chest Wall Trauma Surgery Review.","authors":"Rita Barata,&nbsp;Cristina Rodrigues,&nbsp;Ana Rita Costa,&nbsp;Daniel Cabral","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rib fractures are frequent in trauma patients, being most of them managed on a non-surgical way. However, in selected cases, it is advocated. Chest wall stabilization (CWS) only recently has been best characterized. Available data shows plenty of benefits related to CWS versus non-surgical treatment in selected cases. Even though, it is only performed in a small number of patients according to some national databases. There are lots of topics to define concerning CWS such as the subgroups that benefit most, the time of surgery, which ribs should be stabilized and which incision should be performed. Most of these subjects need to be tailored for each patient. So far, no guidelines for CWS are available, although some algorithms have been proposed based on a combination of clinical experience and risk factors. In high-volume trauma centers it has become a common procedure. The complexity of some cases demands a careful evaluation, especially in the context of multiple injuries, and it should be taken into account in the decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":87136,"journal":{"name":"Revista portuguesa de cirurgia cardio-toracica e vascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia Cardio-Toracica e Vascular","volume":"27 2","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista portuguesa de cirurgia cardio-toracica e vascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia Cardio-Toracica e Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rib fractures are frequent in trauma patients, being most of them managed on a non-surgical way. However, in selected cases, it is advocated. Chest wall stabilization (CWS) only recently has been best characterized. Available data shows plenty of benefits related to CWS versus non-surgical treatment in selected cases. Even though, it is only performed in a small number of patients according to some national databases. There are lots of topics to define concerning CWS such as the subgroups that benefit most, the time of surgery, which ribs should be stabilized and which incision should be performed. Most of these subjects need to be tailored for each patient. So far, no guidelines for CWS are available, although some algorithms have been proposed based on a combination of clinical experience and risk factors. In high-volume trauma centers it has become a common procedure. The complexity of some cases demands a careful evaluation, especially in the context of multiple injuries, and it should be taken into account in the decision.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸壁创伤外科评论。
肋骨骨折是创伤患者的常见病,多数采用非手术治疗。然而,在某些情况下,它是被提倡的。胸壁稳定(CWS)直到最近才得到最好的描述。现有数据显示,在选定的病例中,与非手术治疗相比,CWS有很多益处。尽管如此,根据一些国家数据库,它只在少数患者中进行。关于CWS有很多需要定义的主题,如获益最大的亚组、手术时间、应该稳定哪根肋骨以及应该在哪个切口进行手术。大多数这些主题需要为每个病人量身定制。到目前为止,虽然已经提出了一些基于临床经验和风险因素的算法,但没有针对CWS的指南。在大容量的创伤中心,这已经成为一种常见的程序。一些病例的复杂性需要仔细评估,特别是在多重伤害的情况下,在决定时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Meeting Abstracts of the SPCCTV 4D Visions 20, 28-29 November 2020, Figueira da Foz, Portugal. Multiple Vs Single Arterial Grafting In Coronary Surgery Among Diabetic Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Fibromuscular Dysplasia Of The Renal Arteries. Why And When To Request For A Pet/Ct Scan In A Lung Cancer Patient?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1