Eficácia de diferentes doses e esquemas de administração de ácido tranexâmico em cirurgias ortopédicas de grande porte: estudo randomizado

Ravi Saravanan, Rajagopalan Venkatraman, Krishnamoorthy Karthik, Anand Pushparani
{"title":"Eficácia de diferentes doses e esquemas de administração de ácido tranexâmico em cirurgias ortopédicas de grande porte: estudo randomizado","authors":"Ravi Saravanan,&nbsp;Rajagopalan Venkatraman,&nbsp;Krishnamoorthy Karthik,&nbsp;Anand Pushparani","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tranexamic acid was studied in four different dosage regimens and their efficacy was compared for perioperative blood loss reduction, blood transfusion requirements and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) complication.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two hundred patients undergoing major orthopedic procedures were divided into five groups containing 40 each: placebo, low dose (bolus 10<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup>), low dose<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->maintenance (bolus 10<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> <!-->+<!--> <!-->maintenance 1<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup>.hr<sup>‐1</sup>), high dose (bolus 30<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup>) and high dose<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->maintenance (bolus 30<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup> <!-->+<!--> <!-->maintenance 3<!--> <!-->mg.kg<sup>‐1</sup>.hr<sup>‐1</sup>). Surgical blood loss was measured intraoperatively and drains collection in the first 24 hours postoperative period. Blood transfusion was done when hematocrit falls less than 25%. DVT screening was done in the postoperative period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intraoperative blood loss was 440<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->207.54<!--> <!-->mL in the placebo group, 412.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->208.21<!--> <!-->mL in the low dose group, 290<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->149.6<!--> <!-->ml in the low dose plus maintenance group, 332.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->162.33<!--> <!-->mL in the high dose group and 240.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->88.15<!--> <!-->mL in the high dose maintenance group (<em>p</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The reduction in postoperative blood loss in the drain for the first 24<!--> <!-->hours was 80<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->44.44<!--> <!-->mL in the placebo group, 89.88<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->44.87<!--> <!-->mL in the low dose group, 56.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->29.12<!--> <!-->mL in the low dose plus maintenance group, 77.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->35.74<!--> <!-->mL in the high dose group and 46.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->19.9<!--> <!-->mL in the high dose maintenance group (<em>p</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). DVT was not encountered in any patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Tranexamic acid was most effective in reducing surgical blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in a low dose<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->maintenance group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.013","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Tranexamic acid was studied in four different dosage regimens and their efficacy was compared for perioperative blood loss reduction, blood transfusion requirements and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) complication.

Methods

Two hundred patients undergoing major orthopedic procedures were divided into five groups containing 40 each: placebo, low dose (bolus 10 mg.kg‐1), low dose + maintenance (bolus 10 mg.kg‐1 + maintenance 1 mg.kg‐1.hr‐1), high dose (bolus 30 mg.kg‐1) and high dose + maintenance (bolus 30 mg.kg‐1 + maintenance 3 mg.kg‐1.hr‐1). Surgical blood loss was measured intraoperatively and drains collection in the first 24 hours postoperative period. Blood transfusion was done when hematocrit falls less than 25%. DVT screening was done in the postoperative period.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss was 440 ± 207.54 mL in the placebo group, 412.5 ± 208.21 mL in the low dose group, 290 ± 149.6 ml in the low dose plus maintenance group, 332.5 ± 162.33 mL in the high dose group and 240.7 ± 88.15 mL in the high dose maintenance group (p < 0.001). The reduction in postoperative blood loss in the drain for the first 24 hours was 80 ± 44.44 mL in the placebo group, 89.88 ± 44.87 mL in the low dose group, 56.7 ± 29.12 mL in the low dose plus maintenance group, 77.9 ± 35.74 mL in the high dose group and 46.7 ± 19.9 mL in the high dose maintenance group (p < 0.001). DVT was not encountered in any patient.

Conclusion

Tranexamic acid was most effective in reducing surgical blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in a low dose + maintenance group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量和给药方案氨甲环酸在大型骨科手术中的疗效:随机研究
研究了氨甲环酸四种不同给药方案,并比较了它们在减少围手术期出血量、输血需求和深静脉血栓形成(DVT)并发症方面的疗效。方法将200例骨科大手术患者分为5组,每组40例:安慰剂组、低剂量组(丸10 mg.kg‐1)、低剂量+维持组(丸10 mg.kg‐1)。Kg‐1 +维持1mg . Kg‐1.hr‐1),高剂量(30mg . Kg‐1)和高剂量+维持(30mg . Kg‐1)。Kg‐1 +维持3mg . Kg‐1.hr‐1)。术中测量手术出血量,术后24小时内收集引流液。当血细胞比容低于25%时输血。术后行深静脉血栓筛查。结果安慰剂组术中出血量440±207.54 mL,低剂量组412.5±208.21 mL,低剂量加维持组290±149.6 mL,高剂量组332.5±162.33 mL,高剂量维持组240.7±88.15 mL (p <0.001)。术后24 h引流管出血量减少:安慰剂组80±44.44 mL,低剂量组89.88±44.87 mL,低剂量加维持组56.7±29.12 mL,高剂量组77.9±35.74 mL,高剂量维持组46.7±19.9 mL (p <0.001)。未见深静脉血栓形成。结论低剂量+维持组氨甲环酸对减少手术失血量和输血需要量最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
期刊最新文献
Atualização sobre reações de hipersensibilidade perioperatória: documento conjunto da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) – Parte II: etiologia e diagnóstico Propofol‐cetamina versus dexmedetomidina‐cetamina para sedação durante endoscopia digestiva alta em pacientes pediátricos: estudo clínico randomizado Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado Sequência de segurança de intubação: o algoritmo 10 “Ps” e ferramenta cognitiva para manuseio de vias aéreas em pacientes com COVID‐19 Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1