Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado

Joana Zulian Fiorentin , Alexandre Vieira Martins , Juan Manuel Vélez Cañola , Linda Cecilia Gutierrez , Fábio Perches , Thiago Mamôru Sakae , Sérgio Bernardo Tenório
{"title":"Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado","authors":"Joana Zulian Fiorentin ,&nbsp;Alexandre Vieira Martins ,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Vélez Cañola ,&nbsp;Linda Cecilia Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Fábio Perches ,&nbsp;Thiago Mamôru Sakae ,&nbsp;Sérgio Bernardo Tenório","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>There is no consensus of the ideal technique to provide analgesia in knee ligament reconstructions. The aim of this study was to compare the intensity of postoperative pain in these patients under different modalities of analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Randomized and controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with flexor tendons between December 2013 and 2014. All patients underwent spinal anesthesia and rescue analgesia with tramadol. The Groups C, M, R0,375 and R0,25 were compared with only the previously described technique, subarachnoid morphine (100 μg) or femoral nerve block with 25 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25%, respectively. Pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24<!--> <!-->hours, age, sex, rescue analgesia, adverse reactions and satisfaction were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 83 eligible patients, a predominance of males (85.7%) was observed, between 28 and 31 years. The Group C requested more opioid (27.3%) than the other groups, without significance when compared. There were no significant differences in pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24<!--> <!-->hours. There was a higher incidence of urinary retention in the Group M (23.8%) than in the R0,375 (0%) and prolonged quadriceps motor block in the R0,375 Group (30%) than in the M and C Groups (0%), with statistical significance (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in the intensity of postoperative pain in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with flexor tendons under the analgesic modalities evaluated, despite the predominance of urinary retention in the M Group and motor block in the R0,375 Group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":"70 6","pages":"Pages 613-619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709419301515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objectives

There is no consensus of the ideal technique to provide analgesia in knee ligament reconstructions. The aim of this study was to compare the intensity of postoperative pain in these patients under different modalities of analgesia.

Method

Randomized and controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with flexor tendons between December 2013 and 2014. All patients underwent spinal anesthesia and rescue analgesia with tramadol. The Groups C, M, R0,375 and R0,25 were compared with only the previously described technique, subarachnoid morphine (100 μg) or femoral nerve block with 25 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25%, respectively. Pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 hours, age, sex, rescue analgesia, adverse reactions and satisfaction were evaluated.

Results

Among the 83 eligible patients, a predominance of males (85.7%) was observed, between 28 and 31 years. The Group C requested more opioid (27.3%) than the other groups, without significance when compared. There were no significant differences in pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24 hours. There was a higher incidence of urinary retention in the Group M (23.8%) than in the R0,375 (0%) and prolonged quadriceps motor block in the R0,375 Group (30%) than in the M and C Groups (0%), with statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There was no difference in the intensity of postoperative pain in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with flexor tendons under the analgesic modalities evaluated, despite the predominance of urinary retention in the M Group and motor block in the R0,375 Group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节韧带重建后股神经阻滞与蛛网膜下腔吗啡的比较:一项随机临床研究
背景与目的在膝关节韧带重建中提供镇痛的理想技术尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是比较这些患者在不同镇痛方式下的术后疼痛强度。方法对2013年12月~ 2014年12月行屈肌腱前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术的患者进行随机对照临床试验。所有患者均行脊髓麻醉和曲马多抢救镇痛。C组、M组、R0、375组和R0、25组分别采用上述方法、蛛网膜下腔吗啡(100 μg)或0.375%罗哌卡因和0.25%罗哌卡因阻断股神经25 mL进行比较。评估6、12、24小时疼痛强度、年龄、性别、抢救镇痛、不良反应及满意度。结果83例符合条件的患者中,28 ~ 31岁男性居多(85.7%)。C组阿片类药物需求量大于其他组(27.3%),差异无统计学意义。6、12、24小时疼痛强度差异无统计学意义。M组尿潴留发生率(23.8%)高于r0375组(0%),r0375组延长股四头肌运动阻滞发生率(30%)高于M组和C组(0%),差异均有统计学意义(p <0.05)。结论不同镇痛方式下屈肌腱前交叉韧带重建术患者的术后疼痛强度无显著差异,但M组以尿潴留为主,r0375组以运动阻滞为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
期刊最新文献
Atualização sobre reações de hipersensibilidade perioperatória: documento conjunto da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) – Parte II: etiologia e diagnóstico Propofol‐cetamina versus dexmedetomidina‐cetamina para sedação durante endoscopia digestiva alta em pacientes pediátricos: estudo clínico randomizado Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado Sequência de segurança de intubação: o algoritmo 10 “Ps” e ferramenta cognitiva para manuseio de vias aéreas em pacientes com COVID‐19 Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1