Bariatric surgery in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatus hernia.

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-06 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08486-2
Anmol Ahuja, Kamal Mahawar
{"title":"Bariatric surgery in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatus hernia.","authors":"Anmol Ahuja, Kamal Mahawar","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08486-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) and Hiatus Hernia(HH) are frequently encountered comorbidities in patients seeking Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (BMS) for obesity. Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are the three commonest bariatric procedures performed worldwide. The purpose of this review was to analyse and compare the data on outcomes of these three procedures in patients with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We examined published English language scientific literature available on PubMed for data comparing SG, RYGB, and OAGB with specific focus on GORD outcomes and outcomes in those with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Several authors have addressed the outcome of GORD after bariatric surgery. There have been randomised control trials and comparative studies in the literature comparing the results of these procedure. But very few studies have exclusively looked into the outcome of different procedures in patients with pre-existing GORD and/or HH. In this narrative review, we evaluate pros and cons of three commonest bariatric procedures worldwide in this subgroup of patients seeking BMS. We also suggest an algorithm on the basis of our experience and the available data in scientific literature. CONCLUSIONS Though RYGB is the best anti reflux procedure it is associated with significant higher morbidity/mortality as compared to SG and OAGB. These two procedures can be used in the majority of patients with GORD and/or HH seeking BMS with an acceptance that some patients will need conversion to RYGB in the long term.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08486-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD) and Hiatus Hernia(HH) are frequently encountered comorbidities in patients seeking Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (BMS) for obesity. Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) are the three commonest bariatric procedures performed worldwide. The purpose of this review was to analyse and compare the data on outcomes of these three procedures in patients with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We examined published English language scientific literature available on PubMed for data comparing SG, RYGB, and OAGB with specific focus on GORD outcomes and outcomes in those with GORD and/or HH. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Several authors have addressed the outcome of GORD after bariatric surgery. There have been randomised control trials and comparative studies in the literature comparing the results of these procedure. But very few studies have exclusively looked into the outcome of different procedures in patients with pre-existing GORD and/or HH. In this narrative review, we evaluate pros and cons of three commonest bariatric procedures worldwide in this subgroup of patients seeking BMS. We also suggest an algorithm on the basis of our experience and the available data in scientific literature. CONCLUSIONS Though RYGB is the best anti reflux procedure it is associated with significant higher morbidity/mortality as compared to SG and OAGB. These two procedures can be used in the majority of patients with GORD and/or HH seeking BMS with an acceptance that some patients will need conversion to RYGB in the long term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃食管反流病和/或裂孔疝患者的减肥手术
胃食管反流病(GERD)和裂孔疝(HH)是寻求减肥和代谢手术(BMS)治疗肥胖的患者经常遇到的合并症。套筒胃切除术(SG)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)是世界范围内最常见的三种减肥手术。本综述的目的是分析和比较这三种手术在胃食管反流和/或HH患者中的结果数据。证据获取:我们检查了PubMed上已发表的英语科学文献,以比较SG、RYGB和OAGB的数据,并特别关注GERD和/或HH患者的结果。证据综合:几位作者讨论了减肥手术后胃反流的结果。文献中有随机对照试验和比较研究,比较这些手术的结果。但很少有研究专门研究了不同手术对已有胃食管反流和/或HH患者的影响。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们评估了全球范围内寻求BMS的患者中三种最常见的减肥手术的利弊。我们还根据我们的经验和科学文献中的可用数据提出了一种算法。结论:虽然RYGB是最好的抗反流手术,但与SG和OAGB相比,RYGB的发病率/死亡率明显更高。这两种方法可用于大多数寻求BMS的GERD和/或HH患者,并接受一些患者长期需要转换为RYGB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1