Ethical aspects in the use of radiation in medicine: update from ICRP Task Group 109.

Annals of the ICRP Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-11 DOI:10.1177/0146645320929630
F Bochud, M C Cantone, K Applegate, M Coffey, J Damilakis, M Del Rosario Perez, F Fahey, M Jesudasan, C Kurihara-Saio, B Le Guen, J Malone, M Murphy, L Reid, F Zölzer
{"title":"Ethical aspects in the use of radiation in medicine: update from ICRP Task Group 109.","authors":"F Bochud,&nbsp;M C Cantone,&nbsp;K Applegate,&nbsp;M Coffey,&nbsp;J Damilakis,&nbsp;M Del Rosario Perez,&nbsp;F Fahey,&nbsp;M Jesudasan,&nbsp;C Kurihara-Saio,&nbsp;B Le Guen,&nbsp;J Malone,&nbsp;M Murphy,&nbsp;L Reid,&nbsp;F Zölzer","doi":"10.1177/0146645320929630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whereas scientific evidence is the basis for recommendations and guidance on radiological protection, professional ethics is critically important and should always guide professional behaviour. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) established Task Group 109 to advise medical professionals, patients, families, carers, the public, and authorities about the ethical aspects of radiological protection of patients in the diagnostic and therapeutic use of radiation in medicine. Occupational exposures and research-related exposures are not within the scope of this task group. Task Group 109 will produce a report that will be available to the different interested parties for consultation before publication. Presently, the report is at the stage of a working document that has benefitted from an international workshop organised on the topic by the World Health Organization. It presents the history of ethics in medicine in ICRP, and explains why this subject is important, and the benefits it can bring to the standard biomedical ethics. As risk is an essential part in decision-making and communication, a summary is included on what is known about the dose-effect relationship, with emphasis on the associated uncertainties. Once this theoretical framework has been presented, the report becomes resolutely more practical. First, it proposes an evaluation method to analyse specific situations from an ethical point of view. This method allows stakeholders to review a set of six ethical values and provides hints on how they could be balanced. Next, various situations (e.g. pregnancy, elderly, paediatric, end of life) are considered in two steps: first within a realistic, ethically challenging scenario on which the evaluation method is applied; and second within a more general context. Scenarios are presented and discussed with attention to specific patient circumstances, and on how and which reflections on ethical values can be of help in the decision-making process. Finally, two important related aspects are considered: how should we communicate with patients, family, and other stakeholders; and how should we incorporate ethics into the education and training of medical professionals?</p>","PeriodicalId":39551,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the ICRP","volume":"49 1_suppl","pages":"143-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146645320929630","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the ICRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645320929630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Whereas scientific evidence is the basis for recommendations and guidance on radiological protection, professional ethics is critically important and should always guide professional behaviour. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) established Task Group 109 to advise medical professionals, patients, families, carers, the public, and authorities about the ethical aspects of radiological protection of patients in the diagnostic and therapeutic use of radiation in medicine. Occupational exposures and research-related exposures are not within the scope of this task group. Task Group 109 will produce a report that will be available to the different interested parties for consultation before publication. Presently, the report is at the stage of a working document that has benefitted from an international workshop organised on the topic by the World Health Organization. It presents the history of ethics in medicine in ICRP, and explains why this subject is important, and the benefits it can bring to the standard biomedical ethics. As risk is an essential part in decision-making and communication, a summary is included on what is known about the dose-effect relationship, with emphasis on the associated uncertainties. Once this theoretical framework has been presented, the report becomes resolutely more practical. First, it proposes an evaluation method to analyse specific situations from an ethical point of view. This method allows stakeholders to review a set of six ethical values and provides hints on how they could be balanced. Next, various situations (e.g. pregnancy, elderly, paediatric, end of life) are considered in two steps: first within a realistic, ethically challenging scenario on which the evaluation method is applied; and second within a more general context. Scenarios are presented and discussed with attention to specific patient circumstances, and on how and which reflections on ethical values can be of help in the decision-making process. Finally, two important related aspects are considered: how should we communicate with patients, family, and other stakeholders; and how should we incorporate ethics into the education and training of medical professionals?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学放射应用中的伦理问题:ICRP第109工作组的最新情况。
尽管科学证据是关于放射防护的建议和指导的基础,但职业道德至关重要,并应始终指导职业行为。国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)设立了第109任务组,就医学放射诊断和治疗使用中对患者进行放射防护的伦理问题向医疗专业人员、患者、家属、护理人员、公众和当局提供咨询。职业暴露和与研究相关的暴露不在本任务组的范围内。第109工作组将编写一份报告,供各有关方面在出版前咨询。目前,该报告正处于工作文件阶段,这得益于世界卫生组织就该专题组织的一次国际讲习班。它介绍了ICRP中医学伦理学的历史,并解释了为什么这个主题很重要,以及它可以给标准生物医学伦理学带来的好处。由于风险是决策和沟通的一个重要组成部分,因此对已知的剂量-效应关系进行了总结,并强调了相关的不确定性。一旦提出了这个理论框架,报告就会变得更加实际。首先,提出了一种从伦理角度分析具体情况的评价方法。这种方法允许利益相关者审查一套六种道德价值观,并提供如何平衡它们的提示。接下来,将分两个步骤考虑各种情况(例如怀孕、老年、儿科、生命终结):首先,在应用评估方法的现实的、具有道德挑战性的情况下;第二,在更广泛的背景下。方案提出和讨论的关注具体的病人情况,以及如何和哪些反思道德价值观可以在决策过程中有所帮助。最后,考虑了两个重要的相关方面:我们应该如何与患者、家属和其他利益相关者沟通;我们应该如何将伦理道德融入到医疗专业人员的教育和培训中?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the ICRP
Annals of the ICRP Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The International Commission on Radiological Protection was founded in 1928 to advance for the public benefit the science of radiological protection. The ICRP provides recommendations and guidance on protection against the risks associated with ionising radiation, from artificial sources as widely used in medicine, general industry and nuclear enterprises, and from naturally occurring sources. These reports and recommendations are published six times each year on behalf of the ICRP as the journal Annals of the ICRP. Each issue provides in-depth coverage of a specific subject area.
期刊最新文献
PAEDIATRIC PHANTOMS FOR THE NEXT RECOMMENDATIONS. A KEY ELEMENT OF INTERNAL DOSIMETRY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. Specific Absorbed Fractions for Reference Paediatric Individuals. Variation in hepatic segmental portal venous pulsed wave Doppler flow distribution in patients with NAFLD: A pilot study. Optimisation of Protection in Medical Imaging: Necessary, Challenging, and Possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1