Uso da buprenorfina transdérmica na dor aguda pós‐operatória: revisão sistemática

Felipe Chiodini Machado, Gilson Carone Neto, Luisa Oliveira de Paiva, Tamiris Cristina Soares, Ricardo Kenithi Nakamura, Leonardo de Freitas Nascimento, Camila Sato Campana, Lia Alves Martins Mota Lustosa, Rachel Andrade Cortez, Hazem Adel Ashmawi
{"title":"Uso da buprenorfina transdérmica na dor aguda pós‐operatória: revisão sistemática","authors":"Felipe Chiodini Machado,&nbsp;Gilson Carone Neto,&nbsp;Luisa Oliveira de Paiva,&nbsp;Tamiris Cristina Soares,&nbsp;Ricardo Kenithi Nakamura,&nbsp;Leonardo de Freitas Nascimento,&nbsp;Camila Sato Campana,&nbsp;Lia Alves Martins Mota Lustosa,&nbsp;Rachel Andrade Cortez,&nbsp;Hazem Adel Ashmawi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Postoperative pain is still a major concern in several surgical procedures. Multimodal analgesia is best for postoperative pain management; however, opioid therapy is still the main treatment for pain after surgical procedures. Transdermal buprenorphine is a partial μ agonist opioid widely used for chronic pain syndromes, with limited evidence for acute postoperative pain. A systematic review of studies examining transdermal buprenorphine for acute pain management after surgery was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Contents</h3><p>Data from PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL via EBSCOhost, and LILACS were reviewed, including randomized clinical trials that evaluated total postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic consumption, drug‐related side effects and patient satisfaction with analgesia regimen. Data from nine studies (615 patients) were included in this review. Most studies initiated transdermal buprenorphine use 6 to 48 hours before surgery, maintaining use from 1 to 8 days after the procedure. Most studies showed lower or similar postoperative pain scores, postoperative analgesic consumption and patient satisfaction comparing buprenorphine to placebo, tramadol, celecoxib, flurbiprofen and parecoxib. The incidence of side effects varied between studies, with most showing no increase in drug‐related side effects with buprenorphine use, except one study, which compared buprenorphine to oral tramadol, and one to transdermal fentanyl. However, most results were derived from evidence with an overall high or unclear risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although more studies are necessary, initial results show that transdermal buprenorphine seems to be an effective and safe opioid choice for management of acute postoperative pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709420303470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Postoperative pain is still a major concern in several surgical procedures. Multimodal analgesia is best for postoperative pain management; however, opioid therapy is still the main treatment for pain after surgical procedures. Transdermal buprenorphine is a partial μ agonist opioid widely used for chronic pain syndromes, with limited evidence for acute postoperative pain. A systematic review of studies examining transdermal buprenorphine for acute pain management after surgery was conducted.

Contents

Data from PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL via EBSCOhost, and LILACS were reviewed, including randomized clinical trials that evaluated total postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic consumption, drug‐related side effects and patient satisfaction with analgesia regimen. Data from nine studies (615 patients) were included in this review. Most studies initiated transdermal buprenorphine use 6 to 48 hours before surgery, maintaining use from 1 to 8 days after the procedure. Most studies showed lower or similar postoperative pain scores, postoperative analgesic consumption and patient satisfaction comparing buprenorphine to placebo, tramadol, celecoxib, flurbiprofen and parecoxib. The incidence of side effects varied between studies, with most showing no increase in drug‐related side effects with buprenorphine use, except one study, which compared buprenorphine to oral tramadol, and one to transdermal fentanyl. However, most results were derived from evidence with an overall high or unclear risk of bias.

Conclusions

Although more studies are necessary, initial results show that transdermal buprenorphine seems to be an effective and safe opioid choice for management of acute postoperative pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮丁丙诺啡在术后急性疼痛中的应用:系统综述
背景与目的术后疼痛仍然是许多外科手术的主要问题。多模式镇痛最适合术后疼痛管理;然而,阿片类药物治疗仍然是外科手术后疼痛的主要治疗方法。经皮丁丙诺啡是一种部分μ激动剂阿片类药物,广泛用于慢性疼痛综合征,但用于急性术后疼痛的证据有限。对经皮丁丙诺啡用于手术后急性疼痛管理的研究进行了系统回顾。内容:我们回顾了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册(Central)、通过EBSCOhost的CINAHL和LILACS的数据,包括评估术后总疼痛、术后镇痛药用量、药物相关副作用和患者对镇痛方案满意度的随机临床试验。本综述纳入了9项研究(615例患者)的数据。大多数研究在手术前6至48小时开始使用经皮丁丙诺啡,并在手术后1至8天维持使用。大多数研究显示,丁丙诺啡与安慰剂、曲马多、塞来昔布、氟比洛芬和帕瑞考布相比,术后疼痛评分、术后镇痛药消耗和患者满意度更低或相似。副作用的发生率在不同的研究之间有所不同,除了一项研究将丁丙诺啡与口服曲马多、一项研究与透皮芬太尼进行比较外,大多数研究显示丁丙诺啡的使用没有增加药物相关的副作用。然而,大多数结果来自总体偏倚风险高或不明确的证据。结论虽然还需要更多的研究,但初步结果表明,经皮丁丙诺啡似乎是治疗急性术后疼痛的一种有效和安全的阿片类药物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
期刊最新文献
Atualização sobre reações de hipersensibilidade perioperatória: documento conjunto da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) – Parte II: etiologia e diagnóstico Propofol‐cetamina versus dexmedetomidina‐cetamina para sedação durante endoscopia digestiva alta em pacientes pediátricos: estudo clínico randomizado Comparação entre morfina subaracnoidea e bloqueio do nervo femoral para analgesia após reconstrução ligamentar de joelho: estudo clínico randomizado Sequência de segurança de intubação: o algoritmo 10 “Ps” e ferramenta cognitiva para manuseio de vias aéreas em pacientes com COVID‐19 Dexametasona perineural em bloqueio de plexo braquial interescalênico com levobupivacaína guiado por ultrassonografia para artroscopia de ombro em regime ambulatorial: ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1