Underlying domains of anxiety trait in a Costa Rican sample: Preliminary results

Daniela Ugalde-Araya , Carolina Coto-Vílchez , Alejandro Ávila-Aguirre , Gabriela Chavarría-Soley , Henriette Raventós , Javier Contreras Rojas
{"title":"Underlying domains of anxiety trait in a Costa Rican sample: Preliminary results","authors":"Daniela Ugalde-Araya ,&nbsp;Carolina Coto-Vílchez ,&nbsp;Alejandro Ávila-Aguirre ,&nbsp;Gabriela Chavarría-Soley ,&nbsp;Henriette Raventós ,&nbsp;Javier Contreras Rojas","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Imprecision of the psychiatric phenotype might partially explain the failure of genetic research to identify genes that contribute to susceptibility of anxiety disorders. Previous research concluded two underlying constructs, worry and rumination, might explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican patients with history of mania. The goal of the current study is to explore the presence of latent constructs for quantitative anxiety in a group of subjects with a wide diagnostic phenotype and non-affected individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an exploratory factor analysis of anxiety trait in 709 subjects. Our sample was comprised by 419 subjects with psychiatric disorders and 290 non-affected individuals. We used principal factors extraction method with squared multiple correlations of the STAI (trait subscale).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found the following preliminary results: a three-factor solution with a good simple structure and statistical adequacy was obtained with a KMO of 0.92 (&gt;0.6) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity of 5644,44 (p &lt; 0.05). The STAI items were grouped into three factors: anxiety-absent, worry and rumination based on the characteristics of the symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Two underlying constructs, worry and rumination may explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican subjects. Our proposed underlying structure of subsyndromal anxiety in individuals should be considered as an important factor in defining better phenotypic characterizations on a broader diagnostic concept. Worry and rumination as a phenotypic characterization may assist in genotyping; however, its predictive value on actual illness outcome still requires more research. The Genome-Wide QTL analysis for anxiety trait in the same sample is ongoing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":"35 ","pages":"Pages 38-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.01.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950018303063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Imprecision of the psychiatric phenotype might partially explain the failure of genetic research to identify genes that contribute to susceptibility of anxiety disorders. Previous research concluded two underlying constructs, worry and rumination, might explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican patients with history of mania. The goal of the current study is to explore the presence of latent constructs for quantitative anxiety in a group of subjects with a wide diagnostic phenotype and non-affected individuals.

Methods

We conducted an exploratory factor analysis of anxiety trait in 709 subjects. Our sample was comprised by 419 subjects with psychiatric disorders and 290 non-affected individuals. We used principal factors extraction method with squared multiple correlations of the STAI (trait subscale).

Results

We found the following preliminary results: a three-factor solution with a good simple structure and statistical adequacy was obtained with a KMO of 0.92 (>0.6) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity of 5644,44 (p < 0.05). The STAI items were grouped into three factors: anxiety-absent, worry and rumination based on the characteristics of the symptoms.

Conclusion

Two underlying constructs, worry and rumination may explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican subjects. Our proposed underlying structure of subsyndromal anxiety in individuals should be considered as an important factor in defining better phenotypic characterizations on a broader diagnostic concept. Worry and rumination as a phenotypic characterization may assist in genotyping; however, its predictive value on actual illness outcome still requires more research. The Genome-Wide QTL analysis for anxiety trait in the same sample is ongoing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥斯达黎加样本中焦虑特质的潜在领域:初步结果
精神病学表型的不精确可能部分解释了基因研究未能确定导致焦虑症易感性的基因。先前的研究得出结论,两种潜在的构念——担忧和沉思——可能解释哥斯达黎加有躁狂症史患者的焦虑亚综合征症状。本研究的目的是探讨在一组具有广泛诊断表型的受试者和未受影响的个体中存在的定量焦虑的潜在构念。方法对709名被试的焦虑特征进行探索性因素分析。我们的样本由419名患有精神疾病的受试者和290名未受影响的个体组成。我们使用了基于STAI (trait subscale)多重相关平方的主因子提取方法。结果我们得到了一个结构简单、统计充分性好的三因子解,KMO为0.92 (>0.6), Bartlett's球度检验为5644,44 (p <0.05)。根据症状特点,将STAI项目分为焦虑缺失、担忧和反刍三个因素。结论担忧和反刍这两个潜在构念可以解释哥斯达黎加被试的焦虑亚综合征症状。我们提出的个体亚综合征焦虑的潜在结构应被视为在更广泛的诊断概念上定义更好的表型特征的重要因素。忧虑和反刍作为一种表型特征可能有助于基因分型;然而,其对实际疾病结局的预测价值仍有待进一步研究。同一样本中焦虑特征的全基因组QTL分析正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in biological psychiatry, brain research, neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychoimmunology, psychopathology, psychotherapy. The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version. Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.
期刊最新文献
Seizure and COVID-19: Association and review of potential mechanism Mental health research in the lower-middle-income countries of Africa and Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Acute changes in cerebral blood flow after single-infusion ketamine in major depression: A pilot study Depression and its association with quality of life among elderly: An elderly home- cross sectional study Quality of Thai media reporting of suicidal behavior: Compliance against the World Health Organization media guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1