Not Race or Age but Their Interaction Predicts Pre-Adolescents' Inhibitory Control.

Children and teenagers Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-05 DOI:10.22158/ct.v3n2p50
Shervin Assari, Golnoush Akhlaghipour
{"title":"Not Race or Age but Their Interaction Predicts Pre-Adolescents' Inhibitory Control.","authors":"Shervin Assari,&nbsp;Golnoush Akhlaghipour","doi":"10.22158/ct.v3n2p50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American pre-adolescents are at a higher risk of risky behaviors such as aggression, drug use, alcohol use, and subsequent poor outcomes compared to Caucasian pre-adolescents. All these high-risk behaviors are connected to low levels of inhibitory control (IC).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We used the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) data to compare Caucasian and African American pre-adolescents for the effect of age on pre-adolescents IC, a driver of high-risk behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis included 4,626 pre-adolescents between ages 9 and 10 from the ABCD study. Regression was used to analyze the data. The predictor variable was age measured in months. The main outcome was IC measured by a stop-signal task (SST). Race was the effect modifier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, age was associated with IC. Race also showed a statistically significant interaction with age on pre-adolescents' IC, indicating weaker effects of age on IC for African American than Caucasian pre-adolescents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age-related changes in IC are more pronounced for Caucasian than African American pre-adolescents. To eliminate the racial gap in brain development between African American and Caucasian pre-adolescents, we should address structural and societal barriers that alter age-related development for racial minority pre-adolescents. Social and public policies, rather than health policies, are needed to address structural and societal barriers that hinder African American adolescents' brain development. Interventions should add resources to the urban areas that many African American families live in so their children can have better age-related brain development. Such changes would be essential given IC in pre-adolescents is a predictor of a wide range of behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72575,"journal":{"name":"Children and teenagers","volume":" ","pages":"50-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and teenagers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/ct.v3n2p50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: African American pre-adolescents are at a higher risk of risky behaviors such as aggression, drug use, alcohol use, and subsequent poor outcomes compared to Caucasian pre-adolescents. All these high-risk behaviors are connected to low levels of inhibitory control (IC).

Aim: We used the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) data to compare Caucasian and African American pre-adolescents for the effect of age on pre-adolescents IC, a driver of high-risk behaviors.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included 4,626 pre-adolescents between ages 9 and 10 from the ABCD study. Regression was used to analyze the data. The predictor variable was age measured in months. The main outcome was IC measured by a stop-signal task (SST). Race was the effect modifier.

Results: Overall, age was associated with IC. Race also showed a statistically significant interaction with age on pre-adolescents' IC, indicating weaker effects of age on IC for African American than Caucasian pre-adolescents.

Conclusion: Age-related changes in IC are more pronounced for Caucasian than African American pre-adolescents. To eliminate the racial gap in brain development between African American and Caucasian pre-adolescents, we should address structural and societal barriers that alter age-related development for racial minority pre-adolescents. Social and public policies, rather than health policies, are needed to address structural and societal barriers that hinder African American adolescents' brain development. Interventions should add resources to the urban areas that many African American families live in so their children can have better age-related brain development. Such changes would be essential given IC in pre-adolescents is a predictor of a wide range of behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不是种族或年龄,而是他们的相互作用预测青春期前的抑制控制。
背景:与白种人相比,非裔美国人在青春期前有更高的危险行为风险,如攻击性、吸毒、酗酒和随后的不良后果。所有这些高风险行为都与低水平的抑制性控制(IC)有关。目的:我们使用青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)数据来比较白种人和非裔美国人的前青少年年龄对前青少年IC的影响,IC是高风险行为的驱动因素。方法:本横断面分析包括来自ABCD研究的4,626名年龄在9至10岁之间的学龄前青少年。采用回归分析方法对数据进行分析。预测变量是以月为单位的年龄。主要结果是通过停止信号任务(SST)测量IC。种族是影响因素。结果:总体而言,年龄与IC相关。种族也显示出统计学上显著的年龄与青少年前IC的相互作用,表明年龄对非裔美国人IC的影响弱于白人青少年前IC。结论:年龄相关的IC变化在白种人中比非裔美国人更明显。为了消除非裔美国人和白种人在大脑发育方面的种族差异,我们应该解决改变少数种族前青少年年龄相关发展的结构性和社会障碍。需要社会和公共政策,而不是卫生政策,来解决阻碍非裔美国青少年大脑发育的结构性和社会障碍。干预措施应该向许多非裔美国家庭居住的城市地区增加资源,以便他们的孩子能够更好地与年龄相关的大脑发育。这种改变是必要的,因为学龄前儿童的智力障碍是一系列行为的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subalternity and Displacement in Rafia Zakaria’s “Upstairs Wife”: A Critique upon Pakistani Fiction Navigating Wellbeing and Coping: Quantitative Analysis of The Experiences of Teenager of Infidel Parents in Ibadan Where are the Parents? The Drama of Youth Crime in the Media an Australian Focussed Discourse Analysis Teachers’ Efforts and Barriers to Implementing Empirically-Based Practices in Addressing Disability Stigma Fear and Anxiety, as Reflected in Israeli Children’s Books
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1