Neurofunctional plasticity in fraction learning: An fMRI training study

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2020.100141
Silke M. Wortha , Johannes Bloechle , Manuel Ninaus , Kristian Kiili , Antero Lindstedt , Julia Bahnmueller , Korbinian Moeller , Elise Klein
{"title":"Neurofunctional plasticity in fraction learning: An fMRI training study","authors":"Silke M. Wortha ,&nbsp;Johannes Bloechle ,&nbsp;Manuel Ninaus ,&nbsp;Kristian Kiili ,&nbsp;Antero Lindstedt ,&nbsp;Julia Bahnmueller ,&nbsp;Korbinian Moeller ,&nbsp;Elise Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fractions are known to be difficult for children and adults. Behavioral studies suggest that magnitude processing of fractions can be improved via number line estimation (NLE) trainings, but little is known about the neural correlates of fraction learning.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>To examine the neuro-cognitive foundations of fraction learning, behavioral performance and neural correlates were measured before and after a five-day NLE training.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all evaluation tasks behavioral performance increased after training. We observed a fronto-parietal network associated with number magnitude processing to be recruited in all tasks as indicated by a numerical distance effect. For symbolic fractions, the distance effect on intraparietal activation was only observed after training.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The absence of a distance effect of symbolic fractions before the training could indicate an initially less automatic access to their overall magnitude. NLE training facilitates processing of overall fraction magnitude as indicated by the distance effect in neural activation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100141","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221194932030017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background

Fractions are known to be difficult for children and adults. Behavioral studies suggest that magnitude processing of fractions can be improved via number line estimation (NLE) trainings, but little is known about the neural correlates of fraction learning.

Method

To examine the neuro-cognitive foundations of fraction learning, behavioral performance and neural correlates were measured before and after a five-day NLE training.

Results

In all evaluation tasks behavioral performance increased after training. We observed a fronto-parietal network associated with number magnitude processing to be recruited in all tasks as indicated by a numerical distance effect. For symbolic fractions, the distance effect on intraparietal activation was only observed after training.

Conclusion

The absence of a distance effect of symbolic fractions before the training could indicate an initially less automatic access to their overall magnitude. NLE training facilitates processing of overall fraction magnitude as indicated by the distance effect in neural activation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分数学习中的神经功能可塑性:fMRI训练研究
众所周知,分数对儿童和成人来说都很难。行为学研究表明,分数的大小处理可以通过数线估计(NLE)训练得到改善,但对分数学习的神经相关性知之甚少。方法研究分数学习的神经认知基础,对5天NLE训练前后的行为表现和神经相关因素进行测量。结果训练后各评价任务的行为表现均有所提高。我们观察到与数字大小处理相关的额顶叶网络在所有任务中都被招募,这表明了数字距离效应。对于符号分数,距离对顶叶内激活的影响仅在训练后观察到。结论符号分数在训练前不存在距离效应,说明对符号分数整体大小的自动获取程度较低。神经激活中的距离效应表明,NLE训练有利于整体分数量级的加工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1