Susan E Thompson, Jeffrey L Coughlin, Kelsey Hoffman, Fergal Mullally, Jessie L Christiansen, Christopher J Burke, Steve Bryson, Natalie Batalha, Michael R Haas, Joseph Catanzarite, Jason F Rowe, Geert Barentsen, Douglas A Caldwell, Bruce D Clarke, Jon M Jenkins, Jie Li, David W Latham, Jack J Lissauer, Savita Mathur, Robert L Morris, Shawn E Seader, Jeffrey C Smith, Todd C Klaus, Joseph D Twicken, Jeffrey E Van Cleve, Bill Wohler, Rachel Akeson, David R Ciardi, William D Cochran, Christopher E Henze, Steve B Howell, Daniel Huber, Andrej Prša, Solange V Ramírez, Timothy D Morton, Thomas Barclay, Jennifer R Campbell, William J Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jessie L Dotson, Laurance Doyle, Edward W Dunham, Andrea K Dupree, Eric B Ford, John C Geary, Forrest R Girouard, Howard Isaacson, Hans Kjeldsen, Elisa V Quintana, Darin Ragozzine, Avi Shporer, Victor Silva Aguirre, Jason H Steffen, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, William F Welsh, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A Zamudio, David G Koch, William J Borucki
{"title":"PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY <i>Kepler</i>. VIII. A FULLY AUTOMATED CATALOG WITH MEASURED COMPLETENESS AND RELIABILITY BASED ON DATA RELEASE 25.","authors":"Susan E Thompson, Jeffrey L Coughlin, Kelsey Hoffman, Fergal Mullally, Jessie L Christiansen, Christopher J Burke, Steve Bryson, Natalie Batalha, Michael R Haas, Joseph Catanzarite, Jason F Rowe, Geert Barentsen, Douglas A Caldwell, Bruce D Clarke, Jon M Jenkins, Jie Li, David W Latham, Jack J Lissauer, Savita Mathur, Robert L Morris, Shawn E Seader, Jeffrey C Smith, Todd C Klaus, Joseph D Twicken, Jeffrey E Van Cleve, Bill Wohler, Rachel Akeson, David R Ciardi, William D Cochran, Christopher E Henze, Steve B Howell, Daniel Huber, Andrej Prša, Solange V Ramírez, Timothy D Morton, Thomas Barclay, Jennifer R Campbell, William J Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jessie L Dotson, Laurance Doyle, Edward W Dunham, Andrea K Dupree, Eric B Ford, John C Geary, Forrest R Girouard, Howard Isaacson, Hans Kjeldsen, Elisa V Quintana, Darin Ragozzine, Avi Shporer, Victor Silva Aguirre, Jason H Steffen, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, William F Welsh, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A Zamudio, David G Koch, William J Borucki","doi":"10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of <i>Kepler</i> time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new in this catalog and include two new candidates in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten new high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs) found by the <i>Kepler</i> Pipeline (Twicken et al. 2016). Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. Because of these measurements we fully expect that this catalog can be used to accurately calculate the frequency of planets out to <i>Kepler</i>'s detection limit, which includes temperate, super-Earth size planets around GK dwarf stars in our Galaxy. This paper discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to decide which TCEs are called planet candidates in the DR25 KOI catalog. We also discuss the simulated transits, simulated systematic noise, and simulated astrophysical false positives created in order to characterize the properties of the final catalog. For orbital periods less than 100 d the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates found between 200 and 500 days, our measurements indicate that the Robovetter is 73.5% complete and 37.2% reliable across all searched stars (or 76.7% complete and 50.5% reliable when considering just the FGK dwarf stars). We describe how the measured completeness and reliability varies with period, signal-to-noise, number of transits, and stellar type. Also, we discuss a value called the disposition score which provides an easy way to select a more reliable, albeit less complete, sample of candidates. The entire KOI catalog, the transit fits using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.</p>","PeriodicalId":8588,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series","volume":"235 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9","citationCount":"265","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 265
Abstract
We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of Kepler time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new in this catalog and include two new candidates in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten new high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs) found by the Kepler Pipeline (Twicken et al. 2016). Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. Because of these measurements we fully expect that this catalog can be used to accurately calculate the frequency of planets out to Kepler's detection limit, which includes temperate, super-Earth size planets around GK dwarf stars in our Galaxy. This paper discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to decide which TCEs are called planet candidates in the DR25 KOI catalog. We also discuss the simulated transits, simulated systematic noise, and simulated astrophysical false positives created in order to characterize the properties of the final catalog. For orbital periods less than 100 d the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates found between 200 and 500 days, our measurements indicate that the Robovetter is 73.5% complete and 37.2% reliable across all searched stars (or 76.7% complete and 50.5% reliable when considering just the FGK dwarf stars). We describe how the measured completeness and reliability varies with period, signal-to-noise, number of transits, and stellar type. Also, we discuss a value called the disposition score which provides an easy way to select a more reliable, albeit less complete, sample of candidates. The entire KOI catalog, the transit fits using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
期刊介绍:
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement (ApJS) serves as an open-access journal that publishes significant articles featuring extensive data or calculations in the field of astrophysics. It also facilitates Special Issues, presenting thematically related papers simultaneously in a single volume.