Anatomy of Rouviere's Sulcus and Its Association with Complication of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Surgery Pub Date : 2020-08-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3956070
Abhijeet Kumar, Rupesh Shah, Narendra Pandit, Suresh Prasad Sah, Rakesh Kumar Gupta
{"title":"Anatomy of Rouviere's Sulcus and Its Association with Complication of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Abhijeet Kumar,&nbsp;Rupesh Shah,&nbsp;Narendra Pandit,&nbsp;Suresh Prasad Sah,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1155/2020/3956070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational study involving patients of age ≥16 years who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gall stone at BPKIHS between May and July 2019.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>230 cases were analyzed, and RS was present in 90.4%. Open sulcus type was the commonest (54%), followed by scar type (22.9%), closed sulcus type (12.5%), and slit type (10.6%), respectively. In 59.1% of cases, it was oblique to the anterior, inferior, and external edge of the liver, while in the remaining cases, it was transverse. The mean ± SD values for operative time and duration of hospital stay in the RS visible and the RS not visible groups were 29.16 ± 8.736 and 42.9 ± 23.646 minutes, and 1.26 ± 0.440 and 1.90 ± 0.910 days, respectively (<i>p</i> value ≤0.001). One <i>minor</i> complication occurred in each group: RS initially visible group and RS visible on the adhesion release group, while 3 <i>minor</i> complications occurred in the RS not visible group. Only one <i>major</i> complication occurred in the RS not visible group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identification of RS by operating surgeons is a predictor of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2020 ","pages":"3956070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/3956070","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3956070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Methods: This is a prospective observational study involving patients of age ≥16 years who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gall stone at BPKIHS between May and July 2019.

Result: 230 cases were analyzed, and RS was present in 90.4%. Open sulcus type was the commonest (54%), followed by scar type (22.9%), closed sulcus type (12.5%), and slit type (10.6%), respectively. In 59.1% of cases, it was oblique to the anterior, inferior, and external edge of the liver, while in the remaining cases, it was transverse. The mean ± SD values for operative time and duration of hospital stay in the RS visible and the RS not visible groups were 29.16 ± 8.736 and 42.9 ± 23.646 minutes, and 1.26 ± 0.440 and 1.90 ± 0.910 days, respectively (p value ≤0.001). One minor complication occurred in each group: RS initially visible group and RS visible on the adhesion release group, while 3 minor complications occurred in the RS not visible group. Only one major complication occurred in the RS not visible group.

Conclusion: Identification of RS by operating surgeons is a predictor of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲁维埃沟的解剖及其与腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的关系。
方法:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,涉及年龄≥16岁的患者,他们于2019年5月至7月在BPKIHS接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗无并发症胆结石。结果:分析230例,RS发生率为90.4%。以开沟型最多见(54%),其次为瘢痕型(22.9%)、闭沟型(12.5%)、狭缝型(10.6%)。59.1%的病例为肝前、下、外缘斜位,其余病例为肝横位。RS可见组和RS不可见组手术时间和住院时间的平均±SD值分别为29.16±8.736和42.9±23.646分钟,1.26±0.440和1.90±0.910天(p值≤0.001)。两组均出现1例轻微并发症:初见RS组和解除粘连后可见RS组,未见RS组出现3例轻微并发症。RS不可见组仅发生1例主要并发症。结论:外科医生对RS的识别是安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Mortality and Postoperative Complications Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Umbrella Review. Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Nephroureterectomy without Intraoperative Repositioning Using a New Robotic Surgical System (KD-SR-01TM). Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Gastrectomy in Patients with Situs Inversus Totalis: A Systematic Review. Clinical Factors to Predict Difficult Ureter during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1