{"title":"Methods to Validate Binding and Kinetics of “Proximity-Inducing” Covalent Immune-Recruiting Molecules","authors":"Eden Kapcan, Benjamin Lake, Zi Yang, Anthony F. Rullo","doi":"10.1002/cpch.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emergence of covalent inhibitors and chemoproteomic probes in translational chemical biology research requires the development of robust biophysical and analytical methods to characterize their complex interactions with target biomolecules. Importantly, these methods must efficiently assess target selectivity and accurately discern noncovalent binding from the formation of resultant covalent adducts. One recently reported covalent chemical tool used in tumor immune oncology, covalent immune recruiters (CIRs), increases the proximity of immune cells and cancer cells, promoting immune recognition and response. Herein we describe biolayer interferometry (BLI) biosensor, flow cytometry, and solution fluorescence-based assay approaches to characterize CIR:antibody binding and CIR-antibody covalent-labeling kinetics. BLI technology, akin to surface plasmon resonance, provides the unique opportunity to investigate molecular binding and labeling kinetics both on a solid surface (Basic Protocol 1) and in solution (Alternate Protocol 1). Here, recruitment of mass-containing proteins to the BLI probe via CIR is measured with high sensitivity and is used as a readout of CIR labeling activity. Further, CIR technology is used to label antibodies with a fluorescent handle. In this system, labeling is monitored via SDS-PAGE with a fluorescence gel imager, where increased fluorescence intensity of a sample reflects increased labeling (Basic Protocol 2). Analysis of CIR:antibody target-specific immune activation is demonstrated with a flow cytometry‒based antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) assay (Basic Protocol 3). This ADCP protocol may be further used to discern CIR:antibody binding from covalent adduct formation (Alternate Protocol 3). For the protocols described, each method may be used to analyze characteristics of any covalent-tagging or antibody-recruiting small molecule or protein-based technology. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 1</b>: Determining “on-probe” reaction kinetics of CIR1/CIR4 via biolayer interferometry with Octet RED96</p><p><b>Alternate Protocol 1</b>: Determining “in-solution” reaction kinetics of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting CIR (CIR3) via biolayer interferometry with Octet RED96</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 2</b>: Reaction kinetics of covalently labeled antibodies via fluorescence SDS-PAGE</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 3</b>: Small molecule‒directed antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis on live human cells measured via flow cytometry</p><p><b>Alternate Protocol 2</b>: Kinetic analysis of CIR3:antibody labeling via antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis on flow cytometry</p><p><b>Support Protocol 1</b>: Activation of U937 monocytes with interferon γ</p><p><b>Support Protocol 2</b>: Labeling streptavidin beads with biotinylated prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor</p>","PeriodicalId":38051,"journal":{"name":"Current protocols in chemical biology","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cpch.88","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protocols in chemical biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpch.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The emergence of covalent inhibitors and chemoproteomic probes in translational chemical biology research requires the development of robust biophysical and analytical methods to characterize their complex interactions with target biomolecules. Importantly, these methods must efficiently assess target selectivity and accurately discern noncovalent binding from the formation of resultant covalent adducts. One recently reported covalent chemical tool used in tumor immune oncology, covalent immune recruiters (CIRs), increases the proximity of immune cells and cancer cells, promoting immune recognition and response. Herein we describe biolayer interferometry (BLI) biosensor, flow cytometry, and solution fluorescence-based assay approaches to characterize CIR:antibody binding and CIR-antibody covalent-labeling kinetics. BLI technology, akin to surface plasmon resonance, provides the unique opportunity to investigate molecular binding and labeling kinetics both on a solid surface (Basic Protocol 1) and in solution (Alternate Protocol 1). Here, recruitment of mass-containing proteins to the BLI probe via CIR is measured with high sensitivity and is used as a readout of CIR labeling activity. Further, CIR technology is used to label antibodies with a fluorescent handle. In this system, labeling is monitored via SDS-PAGE with a fluorescence gel imager, where increased fluorescence intensity of a sample reflects increased labeling (Basic Protocol 2). Analysis of CIR:antibody target-specific immune activation is demonstrated with a flow cytometry‒based antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) assay (Basic Protocol 3). This ADCP protocol may be further used to discern CIR:antibody binding from covalent adduct formation (Alternate Protocol 3). For the protocols described, each method may be used to analyze characteristics of any covalent-tagging or antibody-recruiting small molecule or protein-based technology. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Basic Protocol 1: Determining “on-probe” reaction kinetics of CIR1/CIR4 via biolayer interferometry with Octet RED96
Alternate Protocol 1: Determining “in-solution” reaction kinetics of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting CIR (CIR3) via biolayer interferometry with Octet RED96
Basic Protocol 2: Reaction kinetics of covalently labeled antibodies via fluorescence SDS-PAGE
Basic Protocol 3: Small molecule‒directed antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis on live human cells measured via flow cytometry
Alternate Protocol 2: Kinetic analysis of CIR3:antibody labeling via antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis on flow cytometry
Support Protocol 1: Activation of U937 monocytes with interferon γ
Support Protocol 2: Labeling streptavidin beads with biotinylated prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor
验证“邻近诱导”共价免疫招募分子结合和动力学的方法
在翻译化学生物学研究中,共价抑制剂和化学蛋白质组学探针的出现需要发展强大的生物物理和分析方法来表征它们与目标生物分子的复杂相互作用。重要的是,这些方法必须有效地评估目标选择性,并准确地从形成的共价加合物中辨别非共价结合。最近报道的一种用于肿瘤免疫肿瘤学的共价化学工具,共价免疫招募者(cir),增加了免疫细胞和癌细胞的接近度,促进免疫识别和反应。本文描述了生物层干涉法(BLI)、生物传感器、流式细胞术和基于溶液荧光的分析方法来表征CIR:抗体结合和CIR-抗体共价标记动力学。BLI技术类似于表面等离子体共振,为研究固体表面(基本方案1)和溶液中(备选方案1)的分子结合和标记动力学提供了独特的机会。在这里,通过CIR向BLI探针吸收含有质量的蛋白质的测量具有高灵敏度,并被用作CIR标记活性的读取。此外,CIR技术用于荧光处理标记抗体。在该系统中,通过带有荧光凝胶成像仪的SDS-PAGE监测标记,其中,样品荧光强度的增加反映了标记的增加(基本方案2)。用基于流式细胞术的抗体依赖性细胞吞噬(ADCP)试验证明了CIR:抗体靶向性免疫激活的分析(基本方案3)。该ADCP方案可进一步用于从共价加合物形成中辨别CIR:抗体结合(替代方案3)。每种方法都可用于分析任何共价标记或抗体招募小分子或蛋白质技术的特征。©2020 Wiley期刊有限公司基本方案1:通过Octet red96生物层干涉测定CIR1/CIR4的“on-probe”反应动力学。备选方案1:通过Octet red96生物层干涉测定前列腺特异性膜抗原靶向CIR (CIR3)的“in-solution”反应动力学。基本方案2:通过荧光sds - page共价标记抗体的反应动力学。备选方案2:CIR3的动力学分析:通过流式细胞仪上的抗体依赖性细胞吞噬进行抗体标记支持方案1:用干扰素γ激活U937单核细胞支持方案2:用生物素化的前列腺特异性膜抗原受体标记链亲和素珠
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。