Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine Psychosomatics Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.018
Maximilliam A. Cabrera B.A. , Lakshmipriya Karamsetty B.A. , Scott A. Simpson M.D. M.P.H.
{"title":"Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature","authors":"Maximilliam A. Cabrera B.A. ,&nbsp;Lakshmipriya Karamsetty B.A. ,&nbsp;Scott A. Simpson M.D. M.P.H.","doi":"10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The coronavirus pandemic has changed health care rapidly and dramatically.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a critical synthesis of the scientific literature on the pandemic's implications for psychiatric practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A rapid literature review was undertaken to identify scientific literature linking psychiatric outcomes and practice changes due to coronavirus and the disease it causes (COVID-19). A structured quality assessment was used to assess those articles reporting quantitative data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty articles were identified for inclusion, but only 12 contained original data. Eleven of those twelve were rated as of weak quality. The literature described psychiatric sequelae of the coronavirus and related public health interventions through cross-sectional surveys among different populations; no studies include diagnostic or functional impairment data. Populations at risk include COVID-19 survivors, health care workers, the elderly, and those with preexisting psychiatric disease. Impacts on psychiatric practice were described, again without data on changes to quality or access of care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is a quickly accumulating body of evidence on the psychiatric implications of coronavirus including psychological effects on the general public and at-risk subgroups. Similarly, psychiatric practice has witnessed substantial adaptation to the pandemic. However, there remain significant gaps in scientific knowledge. We suggest opportunities for consultation-liaison psychiatry to improve the understanding of the relationship between coronavirus and psychiatric care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20746,"journal":{"name":"Psychosomatics","volume":"61 6","pages":"Pages 607-615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.018","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033318220301584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background

The coronavirus pandemic has changed health care rapidly and dramatically.

Objective

To provide a critical synthesis of the scientific literature on the pandemic's implications for psychiatric practice.

Methods

A rapid literature review was undertaken to identify scientific literature linking psychiatric outcomes and practice changes due to coronavirus and the disease it causes (COVID-19). A structured quality assessment was used to assess those articles reporting quantitative data.

Results

Fifty articles were identified for inclusion, but only 12 contained original data. Eleven of those twelve were rated as of weak quality. The literature described psychiatric sequelae of the coronavirus and related public health interventions through cross-sectional surveys among different populations; no studies include diagnostic or functional impairment data. Populations at risk include COVID-19 survivors, health care workers, the elderly, and those with preexisting psychiatric disease. Impacts on psychiatric practice were described, again without data on changes to quality or access of care.

Conclusions

There is a quickly accumulating body of evidence on the psychiatric implications of coronavirus including psychological effects on the general public and at-risk subgroups. Similarly, psychiatric practice has witnessed substantial adaptation to the pandemic. However, there remain significant gaps in scientific knowledge. We suggest opportunities for consultation-liaison psychiatry to improve the understanding of the relationship between coronavirus and psychiatric care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒及其对精神病学的影响:早期文献的快速回顾。
背景:冠状病毒大流行迅速而巨大地改变了卫生保健。目的:提供关于流行病对精神病学实践影响的科学文献的关键综合。方法:快速查阅文献,找出与冠状病毒及其引起的疾病(COVID-19)有关的精神病学结局和实践变化的科学文献。采用结构化质量评估对报告定量数据的文章进行评估。结果:50篇文章被纳入,但只有12篇文章包含原始数据。12个中有11个被评为质量较差。文献通过对不同人群的横断面调查,描述了冠状病毒的精神后遗症及相关的公共卫生干预措施;没有研究包括诊断或功能损伤数据。高危人群包括COVID-19幸存者、卫生保健工作者、老年人和先前存在精神疾病的人。对精神病学实践的影响进行了描述,同样没有关于护理质量或可及性变化的数据。结论:关于冠状病毒对精神病学的影响,包括对公众和高危亚群体的心理影响,证据正在迅速积累。同样,精神病学的做法也对这一流行病作出了重大调整。然而,在科学知识方面仍然存在重大差距。我们建议提供会诊联络精神病学的机会,以提高对冠状病毒与精神病学护理之间关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychosomatics
Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Psychosomatics is to be the leading psychiatry journal focused on the care of patients with comorbid medical and psychiatric illnesses. The scope of Psychosomatics includes original research, review articles and clinical reports that address psychiatric aspects of medical illnesses and their management. Areas of particular interest include: the effect of co-morbid psychiatric conditions on the management of medical illness; the psychiatric management of patients with comorbid medical illness; educational content for physicians and others specializing in consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry; and, the provision of psychiatric services to medical populations, including integrated care.
期刊最新文献
Finerenone in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: The FIDELIO-DKD Subgroup from China. Trier Social Stress Test Elevates Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Anxiety, But a Singing Test or Unsolvable Anagrams Only Elevates Heart Rate, among Healthy Young Adults Cortisol and Testosterone in Leadership Practice Theory of Mind Ability and Socioeconomic Status, a Study of Street-Connected Children and Adolescents in Ecuador КОПІНГ-ЗАХИСНІ МЕХАНІЗМИ САМОРЕГУЛЯЦІЇ ПСИХОЛОГІВ У СТРЕСОВИХ СИТУАЦІЯХ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1