The Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction Scale (GCLS): Development and validation of a scale to measure outcomes from transgender health services.

Q1 Social Sciences International Journal of Transgenderism Pub Date : 2018-04-26 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15532739.2018.1453425
Bethany A Jones, Walter Pierre Bouman, Emma Haycraft, Jon Arcelus
{"title":"The Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction Scale (GCLS): Development and validation of a scale to measure outcomes from transgender health services.","authors":"Bethany A Jones,&nbsp;Walter Pierre Bouman,&nbsp;Emma Haycraft,&nbsp;Jon Arcelus","doi":"10.1080/15532739.2018.1453425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> It is vital that the treatment offered at transgender health services can be evaluated to ensure a high quality of care. However, the tools currently used to evaluate treatment at transgender health services are limited by mainly focusing on mental health or because they have been developed for binary transgender people only. This study therefore aimed to develop and validate a tool that addresses these limitations. The Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction Scale (GCLS) was developed through reviewing the literature, conducting interviews with transgender people, and holding discussions with experts working in transgender healthcare. An initial pool of items was developed and feedback on these was obtained. The tool was then validated. <b><i>Method:</i></b> For the validation of the tool, a total of 789 participants (451 transgender [171 transgender females, 147 transgender males, 133 people identifying as non-binary], and 338 cisgender [254 females, 84 males]) were recruited from the United Kingdom to test the factor structure and validity of the GCLS. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Exploratory factor analysis retained 38 items which formed seven subscales (psychological functioning; genitalia; social gender role recognition; physical and emotional intimacy; chest; other secondary sex characteristics; and life satisfaction). These seven subscales were found to have good internal consistency and convergent validity. The GCLS was also found to be capable of discriminating between groups (e.g., people who have and have not undergone gender affirming medical interventions). Transgender and cisgender subscale norms are provided for the GCLS. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The GCLS is a suitable tool to use with the transgender population to measure health-related outcomes for both clinical and research purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgenderism","volume":"20 1","pages":"63-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15532739.2018.1453425","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgenderism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1453425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Background: It is vital that the treatment offered at transgender health services can be evaluated to ensure a high quality of care. However, the tools currently used to evaluate treatment at transgender health services are limited by mainly focusing on mental health or because they have been developed for binary transgender people only. This study therefore aimed to develop and validate a tool that addresses these limitations. The Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction Scale (GCLS) was developed through reviewing the literature, conducting interviews with transgender people, and holding discussions with experts working in transgender healthcare. An initial pool of items was developed and feedback on these was obtained. The tool was then validated. Method: For the validation of the tool, a total of 789 participants (451 transgender [171 transgender females, 147 transgender males, 133 people identifying as non-binary], and 338 cisgender [254 females, 84 males]) were recruited from the United Kingdom to test the factor structure and validity of the GCLS. Results: Exploratory factor analysis retained 38 items which formed seven subscales (psychological functioning; genitalia; social gender role recognition; physical and emotional intimacy; chest; other secondary sex characteristics; and life satisfaction). These seven subscales were found to have good internal consistency and convergent validity. The GCLS was also found to be capable of discriminating between groups (e.g., people who have and have not undergone gender affirming medical interventions). Transgender and cisgender subscale norms are provided for the GCLS. Conclusion: The GCLS is a suitable tool to use with the transgender population to measure health-related outcomes for both clinical and research purposes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别认同和生活满意度量表(GCLS):测量跨性别健康服务结果的量表的开发和验证。
背景:至关重要的是,可以对跨性别医疗服务提供的治疗进行评估,以确保高质量的护理。然而,目前用于评估跨性别医疗服务治疗的工具受到限制,主要集中在心理健康方面,或者因为它们只针对二元跨性别者开发。因此,本研究旨在开发和验证一种解决这些局限性的工具。性别认同和生活满意度量表(GCLS)是通过查阅文献、对跨性别者进行访谈以及与跨性别医疗专家进行讨论而制定的。开发了一个初步的项目库,并获得了对这些项目的反馈。然后对该工具进行了验证。方法:为了验证该工具,共从英国招募了789名参与者(451名跨性别者[171名跨性别女性,147名跨性别男性,133名非二进制人]和338名顺性别者[254名女性,84名男性]),以测试GCLS的因子结构和有效性。结果:探索性因素分析保留了38个项目,形成了7个分量表(心理功能;生殖器;社会性别角色识别;身体和情感亲密度;胸部;其他次要性别特征;生活满意度)。这7个分量表具有良好的内部一致性和收敛有效性。GCLS还被发现能够区分不同群体(例如,已经和没有接受过性别确认医疗干预的人)。GCLS提供了跨性别和顺性别分量表规范。结论:GCLS是一种适用于跨性别人群的工具,用于测量临床和研究目的的健康相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Transgenderism
International Journal of Transgenderism Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Transgenderism, together with its partner organization the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), offers an international, multidisciplinary scholarly forum for publication in the field of transgender health in its broadest sense for academics, practitioners, policy makers, and the general population. The journal welcomes contributions from a range of disciplines, such as: Endocrinology Surgery Obstetrics and Gynaecology Psychiatry Psychology Speech and language therapy Sexual medicine Sexology Family therapy Public health Sociology Counselling Law Medical ethics.
期刊最新文献
Special Issue of International Journal of Transgenderism Trans pregnancy: Fertility, reproduction and body autonomy Seeking help when transgender: Exploring the difference in mental and physical health seeking behaviors between transgender and cisgender individuals in Ireland. The experiences of gender diverse and trans children and youth considering and initiating medical interventions in Canadian gender-affirming speciality clinics. What about the family in youth gender diversity? A literature review. Whole-incarceration-setting approaches to supporting and upholding the rights and health of incarcerated transgender people.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1