Assessment of frailty: a survey of quantitative and clinical methods.

BMC biomedical engineering Pub Date : 2019-03-18 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42490-019-0007-y
Yasmeen Naz Panhwar, Fazel Naghdy, Golshah Naghdy, David Stirling, Janette Potter
{"title":"Assessment of frailty: a survey of quantitative and clinical methods.","authors":"Yasmeen Naz Panhwar, Fazel Naghdy, Golshah Naghdy, David Stirling, Janette Potter","doi":"10.1186/s42490-019-0007-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty assessment is a critical approach in assessing the health status of older people. The clinical tools deployed by geriatricians to assess frailty can be grouped into two categories; using a questionnaire-based method or analyzing the physical performance of the subject. In performance analysis, the time taken by a subject to complete a physical task such as walking over a specific distance, typically three meters, is measured. The questionnaire-based method is subjective, and the time-based performance analysis does not necessarily identify the kinematic characteristics of motion and their root causes. However, kinematic characteristics are crucial in measuring the degree of frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies reviewed in this paper indicate that the quantitative analysis of activity of daily living, balance and gait are significant methods for assessing frailty in older people. Kinematic parameters (such as gait speed) and sensor-derived parameters are also strong markers of frailty. Seventeen gait parameters are found to be sensitive for discriminating various frailty levels. Gait velocity is the most significant parameter. Short term monitoring of daily activities is a more significant method for frailty assessment than is long term monitoring and can be implemented easily using clinical tests such as sit to stand or stand to sit. The risk of fall can be considered an outcome of frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty is a multi-dimensional phenomenon that is defined by various domains; physical, social, psychological and environmental. The physical domain has proven to be essential in the objective determination of the degree of frailty in older people. The deployment of inertial sensor in clinical tests is an effective method for the objective assessment of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":72425,"journal":{"name":"BMC biomedical engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42490-019-0007-y","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-019-0007-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Frailty assessment is a critical approach in assessing the health status of older people. The clinical tools deployed by geriatricians to assess frailty can be grouped into two categories; using a questionnaire-based method or analyzing the physical performance of the subject. In performance analysis, the time taken by a subject to complete a physical task such as walking over a specific distance, typically three meters, is measured. The questionnaire-based method is subjective, and the time-based performance analysis does not necessarily identify the kinematic characteristics of motion and their root causes. However, kinematic characteristics are crucial in measuring the degree of frailty.

Results: The studies reviewed in this paper indicate that the quantitative analysis of activity of daily living, balance and gait are significant methods for assessing frailty in older people. Kinematic parameters (such as gait speed) and sensor-derived parameters are also strong markers of frailty. Seventeen gait parameters are found to be sensitive for discriminating various frailty levels. Gait velocity is the most significant parameter. Short term monitoring of daily activities is a more significant method for frailty assessment than is long term monitoring and can be implemented easily using clinical tests such as sit to stand or stand to sit. The risk of fall can be considered an outcome of frailty.

Conclusion: Frailty is a multi-dimensional phenomenon that is defined by various domains; physical, social, psychological and environmental. The physical domain has proven to be essential in the objective determination of the degree of frailty in older people. The deployment of inertial sensor in clinical tests is an effective method for the objective assessment of frailty.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱的评估:定量和临床方法的调查。
背景:衰弱评估是评估老年人健康状况的重要方法。老年医学家用来评估虚弱的临床工具可分为两类;使用基于问卷的方法或分析受试者的身体表现。在性能分析中,测试对象完成一项物理任务所花费的时间,例如走一段特定的距离,通常是三米。基于问卷的方法是主观的,基于时间的性能分析不一定能识别运动的运动学特征及其根本原因。然而,运动学特性在测量脆弱程度时是至关重要的。结果:本文综述的研究表明,日常生活活动、平衡和步态的定量分析是评估老年人虚弱的重要方法。运动学参数(如步态速度)和传感器衍生的参数也是虚弱的有力标志。17个步态参数被发现是敏感的区分各种脆弱水平。步态速度是最重要的参数。日常活动的短期监测是一种比长期监测更重要的虚弱评估方法,并且可以很容易地通过诸如坐到站或站到坐等临床试验来实施。跌倒的危险可以被认为是虚弱的结果。结论:脆弱是一个多领域的多维现象;生理的,社会的,心理的和环境的。事实证明,物理领域在客观确定老年人的虚弱程度方面是必不可少的。在临床试验中部署惯性传感器是客观评估机体虚弱的一种有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
The neurophysiology of sensorimotor prosthetic control. Multi-parameter viscoelastic material model for denture adhesives based on time-temperature superposition and multiple linear regression analysis. The effect of using the hip exoskeleton assistive (HEXA) robot compared to conventional physiotherapy on clinical functional outcomes in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Short-term epileptic seizures prediction based on cepstrum analysis and signal morphology. A handheld device for intra-cavity and ex vivo fluorescence imaging of breast conserving surgery margins with 5-aminolevulinic acid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1