Evaluating the empirical evidence for three transdiagnostic mechanisms in anxiety and mood disorders.

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of General Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-08 DOI:10.1080/00221309.2020.1828252
Sungjin Im, Julie Kahler
{"title":"Evaluating the empirical evidence for three transdiagnostic mechanisms in anxiety and mood disorders.","authors":"Sungjin Im,&nbsp;Julie Kahler","doi":"10.1080/00221309.2020.1828252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High co-morbidity among mental disorders indicates that common transdiagnostic mechanisms underlie various psychopathology, yet there has been little research effort to empirically explicate transdiagnostic processes. A few existing studies are limited in the number of transdiagnostic mechanisms and mental disorder categories explored. The current study addresses these limitations by examining the relationship between three transdiagnostic processes (experiential avoidance, rumination, and emotion dysregulation) and symptom severity of five mental disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, and depression) in a college sample (N = 266). Applying Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), three transdiagnostic models were evaluated, with the five latent variables of mental disorder regressed onto each transdiagnostic process. The results showed that all transdiagnostic models-except the emotion dysregulation model-generally fit the data well. Among the tested models, the strongest evidence was found for experiential avoidance as a transdiagnostic mechanism underlying multiple disorders, suggesting the need for further research effort to reduce experiential avoidance in diverse clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00221309.2020.1828252","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1828252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

High co-morbidity among mental disorders indicates that common transdiagnostic mechanisms underlie various psychopathology, yet there has been little research effort to empirically explicate transdiagnostic processes. A few existing studies are limited in the number of transdiagnostic mechanisms and mental disorder categories explored. The current study addresses these limitations by examining the relationship between three transdiagnostic processes (experiential avoidance, rumination, and emotion dysregulation) and symptom severity of five mental disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, and depression) in a college sample (N = 266). Applying Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), three transdiagnostic models were evaluated, with the five latent variables of mental disorder regressed onto each transdiagnostic process. The results showed that all transdiagnostic models-except the emotion dysregulation model-generally fit the data well. Among the tested models, the strongest evidence was found for experiential avoidance as a transdiagnostic mechanism underlying multiple disorders, suggesting the need for further research effort to reduce experiential avoidance in diverse clinical populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估焦虑和情绪障碍三种跨诊断机制的经验证据。
精神障碍的高合并症表明,各种精神病理背后的共同的跨诊断机制,但很少有研究努力从经验上解释跨诊断过程。一些现有的研究在探索的跨诊断机制和精神障碍类别的数量上受到限制。目前的研究通过在大学样本(N = 266)中检查三种跨诊断过程(经验回避、反刍和情绪失调)与五种精神障碍(广泛性焦虑障碍、恐慌障碍、社交焦虑障碍、特定恐惧症和抑郁症)症状严重程度之间的关系来解决这些局限性。应用结构方程模型(SEM)对3种诊断模型进行评价,并将5个精神障碍潜在变量回归到每个诊断过程中。结果表明,除情绪失调模型外,所有的跨诊断模型都能很好地拟合数据。在测试的模型中,最有力的证据表明,体验性回避是多种疾病的跨诊断机制,这表明需要进一步的研究来减少不同临床人群的体验性回避。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Psychology
Journal of General Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Psychology publishes human and animal research reflecting various methodological approaches in all areas of experimental psychology. It covers traditional topics such as physiological and comparative psychology, sensation, perception, learning, and motivation, as well as more diverse topics such as cognition, memory, language, aging, and substance abuse, or mathematical, statistical, methodological, and other theoretical investigations. The journal especially features studies that establish functional relationships, involve a series of integrated experiments, or contribute to the development of new theoretical insights or practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Self-focused autonomy, other-focused pro-sociality, and well-being: a cross-national cluster analysis. Age differences in the recruitment of syntactic analysis and semantic plausibility during sentence comprehension. Don't worry, they get the idea: instructions have no impact on dehumanization ratings on the Ascent of Human Scale. Causality orientations and spontaneous mental contrasting. Roles of expressed gratitude and apologies in predicting reciprocal responsiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1