General Theorizing and Historical Specificity in the 'Keynes Versus the Classics' Dispute.

IF 0.5 Q3 ECONOMICS Eastern Economic Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-06 DOI:10.1057/s41302-020-00177-1
Teodoro Dario Togati
{"title":"General Theorizing and Historical Specificity in the 'Keynes Versus the Classics' Dispute.","authors":"Teodoro Dario Togati","doi":"10.1057/s41302-020-00177-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper addresses the issues of general theorizing and historical specificity in the 'Keynes versus the Classics' dispute and puts forward two main arguments. First, the current macroeconomic orthodoxy wins the 'relative' generality contest because it implies that institutions influence outcomes, such as the natural rate of unemployment, in contrast with Keynes's 'internalist' approach, which neglects historical specificity. Secondly, mainstream macro is not truly general in an 'absolute' sense since it only makes sense under very special real-world institutional conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45363,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Economic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"273-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/s41302-020-00177-1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-020-00177-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper addresses the issues of general theorizing and historical specificity in the 'Keynes versus the Classics' dispute and puts forward two main arguments. First, the current macroeconomic orthodoxy wins the 'relative' generality contest because it implies that institutions influence outcomes, such as the natural rate of unemployment, in contrast with Keynes's 'internalist' approach, which neglects historical specificity. Secondly, mainstream macro is not truly general in an 'absolute' sense since it only makes sense under very special real-world institutional conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“凯恩斯与经典”之争中的一般理论化与历史特殊性。
本文论述了“凯恩斯与经典”之争中的一般理论化和历史特殊性问题,并提出了两个主要论点。首先,当前的宏观经济正统理论赢得了“相对”一般性竞赛,因为它暗示制度会影响结果,比如自然失业率,这与凯恩斯的“内部主义”方法形成鲜明对比,后者忽视了历史特殊性。其次,主流宏观在“绝对”意义上并不是真正普遍的,因为它只在非常特殊的现实世界制度条件下才有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Eastern Economic Journal, a quarterly publication of the Eastern Economic Association, was established in 1973. The EEJ publishes papers written from every perspective, in all areas of economics and is committed to free and open intellectual inquiry from diverse philosophical perspectives. It welcomes manuscripts that are methodological and philosophical as well as empirical and theoretical. Readability and general interest are major factors in publication decision.
期刊最新文献
Parallel Worlds? The Partisan Effects of COVID-19 on Real Estate Much Ado about Nothing? Counterterrorist Legislation has Few Effects David Colander and Modern Economics U.S. Intervention and Coercion-Enabling Capital: Evidence from El Salvador AI and Warfare: A Rational Choice Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1