An Examination of Gender Differences in the National Diabetes Prevention Program's Lifestyle Change Program.

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions Diabetes Educator Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-16 DOI:10.1177/0145721720964585
Matt C Jackson, Shifan Dai, Renée A Skeete, Michelle Owens-Gary, Michael J Cannon, Bryce D Smith, Rajai Jabrah, Svetlana E Masalovich, Robin E Soler
{"title":"An Examination of Gender Differences in the National Diabetes Prevention Program's Lifestyle Change Program.","authors":"Matt C Jackson,&nbsp;Shifan Dai,&nbsp;Renée A Skeete,&nbsp;Michelle Owens-Gary,&nbsp;Michael J Cannon,&nbsp;Bryce D Smith,&nbsp;Rajai Jabrah,&nbsp;Svetlana E Masalovich,&nbsp;Robin E Soler","doi":"10.1177/0145721720964585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to examine how gender was related to enrollment and number of sessions attended in the National Diabetes Prevention Program's Lifestyle Change Program (DPP LCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand program uptake, a population of those who would be eligible for the LCP was compared to those who enrolled. Estimates of those eligible were computed using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, whereas enrollment and sessions attended were computed using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that although similar numbers of males and females were eligible for the program, only 39 321 males versus 121 007 females had enrolled in the National DPP LCP by the end of 2017 (odds ratio = 3.20; 95% CI, 3.17-3.24). The gender differences persisted even when stratifying by age or race/ethnicity. In contrast, no significant gender differences were found between the average number of sessions attended for males (14.0) and females (13.8).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of the study can help inform efforts to market and tailor programs to appeal more directly to men and other groups that are underrepresented in the National DPP LCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721720964585","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720964585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine how gender was related to enrollment and number of sessions attended in the National Diabetes Prevention Program's Lifestyle Change Program (DPP LCP).

Methods: To better understand program uptake, a population of those who would be eligible for the LCP was compared to those who enrolled. Estimates of those eligible were computed using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, whereas enrollment and sessions attended were computed using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program.

Results: Results revealed that although similar numbers of males and females were eligible for the program, only 39 321 males versus 121 007 females had enrolled in the National DPP LCP by the end of 2017 (odds ratio = 3.20; 95% CI, 3.17-3.24). The gender differences persisted even when stratifying by age or race/ethnicity. In contrast, no significant gender differences were found between the average number of sessions attended for males (14.0) and females (13.8).

Discussion: Results of the study can help inform efforts to market and tailor programs to appeal more directly to men and other groups that are underrepresented in the National DPP LCP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式改变计划中性别差异的检验。
目的:本研究的目的是研究性别与参加国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式改变计划(DPP LCP)的人数和会议次数之间的关系。方法:为了更好地了解项目的吸收情况,将符合LCP条件的人群与入组人群进行比较。根据国家健康和营养检查调查的数据计算出符合条件的估计人数,而根据疾病控制和预防中心的糖尿病预防识别计划的数据计算出登记人数和参加的会议。结果:结果显示,尽管符合计划条件的男女人数相近,但截至2017年底,只有39 321名男性和121 007名女性参加了全国民pp LCP(优势比= 3.20;95% ci, 3.17-3.24)。即使按年龄或种族/民族分层,性别差异仍然存在。相比之下,男性(14.0次)和女性(13.8次)的平均参加次数之间没有明显的性别差异。讨论:这项研究的结果可以为营销和定制方案的努力提供信息,以更直接地吸引男性和其他在全国民进党LCP中代表性不足的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
期刊最新文献
Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Tokoh dan Ajaran Tasawuf Sufi Besar Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Pada Materi Kalimat Thayyibah di Kelas III MI Salafiyah Syafi’iyah Proto 01 Kabupaten Pekalongan Menanamkan Sikap Sopan Santun Melalui Pendidikan Karakter Pada Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Mengenai Materi Adab Santun dan Menghargai Teman di Kelas 2 MISJanggala 2 Kecamatan Cidolog Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fikih Materi Shalat Jamak dan Qashar Melalui Metode Modeling The Way Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Pendistribusian Zakat Secara Produktif Dalam Islam Pada Fase E Kelas X SMKS Garudaya Bontonmpo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1