The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Parental Burnout Assessment: Transcultural adaptation and initial validity evidence.

IF 3.4 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development Pub Date : 2020-11-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-21 DOI:10.1002/cad.20374

Marisa Matias, Joyce Aguiar, Filipa César, Ana Carolina Braz, Elizabeth Joan Barham, Vanessa Leme, Luciana Elias, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Moïra Mikolajczak, Isabelle Roskam, Anne Marie Fontaine

{"title":"The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Parental Burnout Assessment: Transcultural adaptation and initial validity evidence.","authors":"Marisa Matias, Joyce Aguiar, Filipa César, Ana Carolina Braz, Elizabeth Joan Barham, Vanessa Leme, Luciana Elias, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Moïra Mikolajczak, Isabelle Roskam, Anne Marie Fontaine","doi":"10.1002/cad.20374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA), the current gold-standard measure of parental burnout (PB). We surveyed parents in Portugal (N = 407) and Brazil (N = 301). We (a) compared the factor structure of the Brazilian-Portuguese version with the original structure of the PBA, (b) tested the adequacy of a second-order factor structure, (c) evaluated invariance across gender and countries, (d) examined reliability, and (e) evaluated whether PB levels are related to gender, satisfaction with life, and parental self-efficacy (PSE). Results provided evidence for the validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese PBA and its four facets. Factor models supported the use of both individual facet scores and a global PB score. The structures tested were invariant across countries and gender, and all factors had good reliability. Relations with PSE, life satisfaction, and gender provided initial evidence for validity, and suggested a possible influence of intensive motherhood models.</p>","PeriodicalId":47745,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development","volume":"2020 174","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cad.20374","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA), the current gold-standard measure of parental burnout (PB). We surveyed parents in Portugal (N = 407) and Brazil (N = 301). We (a) compared the factor structure of the Brazilian-Portuguese version with the original structure of the PBA, (b) tested the adequacy of a second-order factor structure, (c) evaluated invariance across gender and countries, (d) examined reliability, and (e) evaluated whether PB levels are related to gender, satisfaction with life, and parental self-efficacy (PSE). Results provided evidence for the validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese PBA and its four facets. Factor models supported the use of both individual facet scores and a global PB score. The structures tested were invariant across countries and gender, and all factors had good reliability. Relations with PSE, life satisfaction, and gender provided initial evidence for validity, and suggested a possible influence of intensive motherhood models.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

巴西-葡萄牙版本的父母倦怠评估:跨文化适应和初步效度证据。

本研究旨在检验巴西-葡萄牙版父母职业倦怠评估(PBA)的有效性，PBA是目前衡量父母职业倦怠(PB)的金标准。我们调查了葡萄牙(N = 407)和巴西(N = 301)的父母。我们(a)比较了巴西-葡萄牙语版本的因素结构与原始的PBA结构，(b)测试了二阶因素结构的充分性，(c)评估了性别和国家之间的不变性，(d)检验了信度，(e)评估了PB水平是否与性别、生活满意度和父母自我效能感(PSE)相关。结果为巴西-葡萄牙语PBA及其四个方面的有效性提供了证据。因子模型支持使用个体面评分和全局PB评分。测试的结构在不同国家和性别之间是不变的，所有因素都具有良好的可靠性。与PSE、生活满意度和性别的关系为有效性提供了初步证据，并提示强化母性模式可能产生影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

3.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The mission of New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development is to provide scientific and scholarly presentations on cutting edge issues and concepts in the field of child and adolescent development. Each issue focuses on a specific new direction or research topic, and is peer reviewed by experts on that topic. Any topic in the domain of child and adolescent development can be the focus of an issue. Topics can include social, cognitive, educational, emotional, biological, neuroscience, health, demographic, economical, and socio-cultural issues that bear on children and youth, as well as issues in research methodology and other domains. Topics that bridge across areas are encouraged, as well as those that are international in focus or deal with under-represented groups. The readership for the journal is primarily students, researchers, scholars, and social servants from fields such as psychology, sociology, education, social work, anthropology, neuroscience, and health. We welcome scholars with diverse methodological and epistemological orientations.