Retained Digital Flexible Ureteroscope During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Q4 Medicine Journal of Endourology Case Reports Pub Date : 2020-09-17 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1089/cren.2020.0010
Tony T Chen, Ian Metzler, Robert M Sweet
{"title":"Retained Digital Flexible Ureteroscope During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Tony T Chen,&nbsp;Ian Metzler,&nbsp;Robert M Sweet","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> During percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy can be utilized to facilitate repositioning of stones, enable direct vision percutaneous access, minimize radiation exposure, reduce operating times, and improve stone-free rates. Although advancements in technique and flexible ureteroscope technology for the past decades have rendered complications rare, herein we report a case of a retained ureteroscope during percutaneous nephrolithotomy that was effectively managed endoscopically. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 59-year-old Caucasian gentleman with a history of recurrent bilateral nephrolithiasis presents for a left-sided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for a large stone burden >4 cm. A ureteral access sheath was used and retrograde ureteroscopy was performed to first reposition several stones into the renal pelvis. During manipulation, we were unexpectedly unable to retract the ureteroscope from the access sheath. We describe procedural details leading up to the event and subsequent intraoperative management using an antegrade approach. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A retained flexible ureteroscope is a rare but serious intraoperative complication that may require invasive open surgical management. However, careful endoscopic management may be feasible in select cases, allowing for preservation of ureter and instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"184-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2020.0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy can be utilized to facilitate repositioning of stones, enable direct vision percutaneous access, minimize radiation exposure, reduce operating times, and improve stone-free rates. Although advancements in technique and flexible ureteroscope technology for the past decades have rendered complications rare, herein we report a case of a retained ureteroscope during percutaneous nephrolithotomy that was effectively managed endoscopically. Case Presentation: A 59-year-old Caucasian gentleman with a history of recurrent bilateral nephrolithiasis presents for a left-sided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for a large stone burden >4 cm. A ureteral access sheath was used and retrograde ureteroscopy was performed to first reposition several stones into the renal pelvis. During manipulation, we were unexpectedly unable to retract the ureteroscope from the access sheath. We describe procedural details leading up to the event and subsequent intraoperative management using an antegrade approach. Conclusion: A retained flexible ureteroscope is a rare but serious intraoperative complication that may require invasive open surgical management. However, careful endoscopic management may be feasible in select cases, allowing for preservation of ureter and instrument.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肾镜取石术中保留数字输尿管镜。
背景:在经皮肾镜取石术中,逆行输尿管镜可方便结石重新定位,实现经皮直接视觉通路,减少辐射暴露,减少手术时间,提高结石清除率。尽管在过去的几十年里,技术和输尿管镜技术的进步使得并发症变得罕见,但我们在此报告一例经皮肾镜取石术中输尿管镜保留的病例,该病例在内镜下得到了有效的处理。病例介绍:一名59岁的白人男性,有复发性双侧肾结石病史,因结石大于4厘米而行左侧经皮肾镜取石术。使用输尿管通路鞘并行逆行输尿管镜检查,首先将几颗结石重新定位到肾盂内。在操作过程中,我们意外地无法从输尿管鞘中缩回输尿管镜。我们描述了导致事件的程序细节和随后使用顺行方法的术中处理。结论:保留输尿管镜是一种罕见但严重的术中并发症,可能需要有创性开放手术处理。然而,在某些情况下,仔细的内镜治疗可能是可行的,允许保留输尿管和器械。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Complication of Amplatz Sheath: Amplatz Sheath Rupture During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Patient's Fear of Being Infected, Another Complication of COVID-19 Outbreak: A Lesson Learned from a Case of Life-Threatening Urolithiasis. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Renal Pelvis. Endoscopic Management of Chyluria Caused by Pyelolymphatic Fistula After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1